Direction-of-arrival estimates in the presence of wavelength, gain, and phase errors

Direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation using an array of sensors relies on an accurate characterization of the array manifold. In the absence of characterization errors, established techniques like MUSIC can be shown to perform well both theoretically and in simulation. However, in the presence of unknown sensor and/or source characteristics, the performance of most methods degrades significantly. We consider the problem of estimating gain and phase errors of an array of sensors whose physical positions are known. Our algorithm assumes that the gain and phase characteristics of the sensors are independent of DOA and employs multiple calibration sources with known DOA's. It differs from other algorithms in that the signal wavelengths are unknown. A least-squares formulation of the problem is then shown to be NP-complete, implying that an efficient solution is unlikely to exist. An implicit, enumerative technique is used to obtain the exact solution. For the special case of collinear sensors, we further show that an inherent ambiguity in the model prevents exact phase characterization unless the wavelength of one calibration source is assumed known. A theorem is presented relating the error in DOA to the difference between the assumed and true wavelengths of this calibration source. Simulation results are presented for both noncollinear and collinear arrays. >

[1]  B. Friedlander,et al.  Eigenstructure methods for direction finding with sensor gain and phase uncertainties , 1988, ICASSP-88., International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[2]  A. Lee Swindlehurst,et al.  A Performance Analysis ofSubspace-Based Methods in thePresence of Model Errors { Part I : The MUSIC AlgorithmA , 1992 .

[3]  R. O. Schmidt,et al.  Multiple emitter location and signal Parameter estimation , 1986 .

[4]  James Ting-Ho Lo,et al.  Eigenstructure methods for array sensor localization , 1987, ICASSP '87. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[5]  V. Pisarenko The Retrieval of Harmonics from a Covariance Function , 1973 .

[6]  Petre Stoica,et al.  MUSIC, maximum likelihood, and Cramer-Rao bound , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[7]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[8]  Antony P.-C. Ng,et al.  Unknown signal wavelength and array processing , 1994, Proceedings of ICASSP '94. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[9]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  Direction of arrival estimation by eigenstructure methods with unknown sensor gain and phase , 1985, ICASSP '85. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[10]  Peter M. Schultheiss,et al.  Array shape calibration using sources in unknown locations-Part I: Far-field sources , 1987, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[11]  Benjamin Friedlander A sensitivity analysis of the MUSIC algorithm , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[12]  Peter M. Schultheiss,et al.  Array shape calibration using sources in unknown locations-Part II: Near-field sources and estimator implementation , 1987, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[13]  S. Lawrence Marple,et al.  Observability conditions for multiple signal direction finding and array sensor localization , 1992, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[14]  V. U. Reddy,et al.  Analysis of MUSIC algorithm with sensor gain and phase perturbations , 1991, Signal Process..

[15]  Petre Stoica,et al.  MUSIC, maximum likelihood, and Cramer-Rao bound: further results and comparisons , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..