A Patient Specific Biomechanical Analysis of Custom Root Analogue Implant Designs on Alveolar Bone Stress: A Finite Element Study

Objectives. The aim of this study was to analyse by means of FEA the influence of 5 custom RAI designs on stress distribution of peri-implant bone and to evaluate the impact on microdisplacement for a specific patient case. Materials and Methods. A 3D surface model of a RAI for the upper right canine was constructed from the cone beam computed tomography data of one patient. Subsequently, five (targeted) press-fit design modification FE models with five congruent bone models were designed: “Standard,” “Prism,” “Fins,” “Plug,” and “Bulbs,” respectively. Preprocessor software was applied to mesh the models. Two loads were applied: an oblique force (300 N) and a vertical force (150 N). Analysis was performed to evaluate stress distributions and deformed contact separation at the peri-implant region. Results. The lowest von Mises stress levels were numerically observed for the Plug design. The lowest levels of contact separation were measured in the Fins model followed by the Bulbs design. Conclusions. Within the limitations of the applied methodology, adding targeted press-fit geometry to the RAI standard design will have a positive effect on stress distribution, lower concentration of bone stress, and will provide a better primary stability for this patient specific case.

[1]  A. Kocher,et al.  Immediate, single stage, truly anatomic zirconia implant in lower molar replacement: a case report with 2.5 years follow-up. , 2011, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[2]  J. Blanco,et al.  Influence on early osseointegration of dental implants installed with two different drilling protocols: a histomorphometric study in rabbit. , 2011, Clinical oral implants research.

[3]  R. T. Hart,et al.  Mechanics of bone tissue , 2003 .

[4]  G. Liu,et al.  Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[5]  Bassam Hassan,et al.  Designing a novel dental root analogue implant using cone beam computed tomography and CAD/CAM technology. , 2013, Clinical oral implants research.

[6]  Wei Li,et al.  Dental implant induced bone remodeling and associated algorithms. , 2009, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[7]  A N Natali,et al.  A Comparative Analysis Based on Different Strength Criteria for Evaluation of Risk Factor for Dental Implants , 2002, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[8]  Chun-Li Lin,et al.  Multi-factorial analysis of variables influencing the bone loss of an implant placed in the maxilla: prediction using FEA and SED bone remodeling algorithm. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  M. Figliuzzi,et al.  A novel root analogue dental implant using CT scan and CAD/CAM: selective laser melting technology. , 2012, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[10]  J B Brunski,et al.  Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: current status and future developments. , 2000, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[11]  Jui-Ting Hsu,et al.  Bone stress and interfacial sliding analysis of implant designs on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: a non-linear finite element study. , 2008, Journal of dentistry.

[12]  Hom-Lay Wang,et al.  The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration. , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[13]  R A Brand,et al.  Toward an understanding of implant occlusion and strain adaptive bone modeling and remodeling. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[14]  Murat Akkocaoglu,et al.  Implant design and intraosseous stability of immediately placed implants: a human cadaver study. , 2005, Clinical oral implants research.

[15]  James Laney Williams,et al.  Anisotropic elasticity of cortical and cancellous bone in the posterior mandible increases peri-implant stress and strain under oblique loading. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[16]  Y Akagawa,et al.  A mimic osseointegrated implant model for three-dimensional finite element analysis. , 2003, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[17]  K. Al-Shammari,et al.  Effects of implant thread geometry on percentage of osseointegration and resistance to reverse torque in the tibia of rabbits. , 2004, Journal of periodontology.

[18]  J B Brunski,et al.  Avoid pitfalls of overloading and micromotion of intraosseous implants. , 1993, Dental implantology update.

[19]  Aldo Macchi,et al.  Immediate, non-submerged, root-analogue direct laser metal sintering (DLMS) implants: a 1-year prospective study on 15 patients , 2013, Lasers in Medical Science.

[20]  Bassam Hassan,et al.  Accuracy of preemptively constructed, cone beam CT-, and CAD/CAM technology-based, individual Root Analogue Implant technique: an in vitro pilot investigation. , 2014, Clinical oral implants research.

[21]  Yuehuei H. An,et al.  Mechanical testing of bone and the bone-implant interface , 1999 .

[22]  A. Kocher,et al.  Immediate, non-submerged, root-analogue zirconia implant in single tooth replacement. , 2008, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[23]  C. Goodacre,et al.  Factors affecting the survival of implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses: a clinical report. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[24]  Y C Loo,et al.  Application of finite element method in dental implant research , 2009 .

[25]  L. Geris,et al.  Histodynamics of bone tissue formation around immediately loaded cylindrical implants in the rabbit. , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.