Opening up the black box in GSS research: explaining group decision outcome with group process

Group process, a central element of group interaction, has been frequently treated as a black box in many prior Group Support Systems (GSS) studies. Most prior GSS research focused on group outcome and efforts to study group process were relatively limited. As a result, effects of group process on group outcome in GSS use are not fully understood. This study focuses on group process and intends to explain variations in group decision outcome from group influence process. Group process variables investigated were informational influence, normative influence, and influence equality. Group decision outcome variable studied was group consensus. The role of task type was also examined. The research findings indicated that GSS had a complex impact on group decision outcome for two reasons. First, this impact was mediated by group influence process variables. Second, this impact was moderated by task type. The research findings provide an additional clue on why prior GSS empirical studies in the literature yielded inconsistent research findings. The implications of the research findings to GSS researchers and users are finally discussed.

[1]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[2]  Linda L. Putnam.  Procedural Messages and Small Group Work Climates: A Lag Sequential Analysis , 1981 .

[3]  A. Pinsonneault,et al.  Technology and groups: assessments of the empirical research , 1990 .

[4]  E.,et al.  GROUPS : INTERACTION AND PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[5]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Group Decision Support Systems on Group Development , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Extensions to media richness theory: a test of the task-media fit hypothesis , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[7]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Computer support of groups: theory-based models for GDSS research , 1991 .

[8]  Wayne W. Huang,et al.  Impacts of GSS generic structures and task types on group communication process and outcome: Some expected and unexpected research findings , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[9]  J. McGrath,et al.  Group Task Performance and Communication Technology , 1993 .

[10]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  1001 Unanswered Research Questions in GSS , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work , 1990 .

[12]  Kwok Kee Wei,et al.  Task as a moderator for the effects of group support systems on group influence processes , 1997 .

[13]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Investigating the Moderators of the Group Support Systems Use with Meta-Analysis , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  I. H. Öğüş,et al.  NATO ASI Series , 1997 .

[15]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Study of Collaborative Group Work With and Without Computer-Based Support , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Michiel van Genuchten,et al.  Supporting inspections with an electronic meeting system , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[17]  Kwok Kee Wei,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Effects of Group Support Systems (GSS) and Task Type on Group Interactions from an Influence Perspective , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Esther E. Klein,et al.  Philosophical dimensions of anonymity in group support systems: Ethical implications of social psychological consequences , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Ronald Batenburg,et al.  The role of GSS in participatory policy analysis: A field experiment , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[20]  M. Kaplan.  Discussion Polarization Effects in a Modified Jury Decision Paradigm: Informational Influences , 1977 .

[21]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Computer Support for Meetings of Groups Working on Unstructured Problems: A Field Experiment , 1988, MIS Q..

[22]  Joseph E. McGrath,et al.  Time matters in groups , 1990 .

[23]  Robert D. McPhee,et al.  Group decision‐making as a structurational process , 1985 .

[24]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[25]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Mediating Group Influence With a Group Support System: An Experimental Investigation , 1998, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[26]  A. Jenness,et al.  The role of discussion in changing opinion regarding a matter of fact. , 1932 .

[27]  George P. Huber,et al.  Issues in the Design of Group Decision Support Systems , 1984, MIS Q..

[28]  Charles E. Miller,et al.  Group decision making and normative versus informational influence: Effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule. , 1987 .

[29]  J. McGrath,et al.  Groups Interacting with Technology: Ideas, Evidence, Issues and an Agenda , 1993 .

[30]  R T Watson,et al.  Can a lean e-mail medium be used for rich communication? A psychological perspective , 1998 .

[31]  Michael E. Holmes,et al.  Conflict management in a computer-supported meeting in a computer supported meeting environment , 1991 .

[32]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  An Experimental Investigation Of The Effect Of A Group Decision Support System On Normative Influence In Small Groups , 1991, ICIS.

[33]  Bernard C. Y. Tan,et al.  A dialogue technique to enhance electronic communication in virtual teams , 2000 .

[34]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[35]  Stephanie Newport,et al.  Effects of absolute and relative sunk costs on the decision to persist with a course of action , 1991 .

[36]  Abhijit Gopal,et al.  Understanding GDSS in Symbolic Context: Shifting the Focus from Technology to Interaction , 2000, MIS Q..

[37]  Wei Huang,et al.  Compensating effects of GSS on group performance , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[38]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[39]  J. Valacich,et al.  Group Support Systems: New Perspectives , 1992 .

[40]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[41]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Understanding Fit and Appropriation Effects in Group Support Systems via Meta-Analysis , 2001, MIS Q..

[42]  George P. Huber,et al.  A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence , 1990 .

[43]  James D. McKeen,et al.  Enhancing Computer-Mediated Communication: An experimental investigation into the use of a Group Decision Support System for face-to-face versus remote meetings , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[44]  David F. Beer.  A Dialogue Technique to Enhance Electronic Communication in Virtual Teams , 2003 .

[45]  Carl E. Larson,et al.  Teamwork: What Must Go Right/What Can Go Wrong , 1989 .

[46]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Network Nation: Human Communication Via Computer , 1979 .

[47]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Study of Influence in Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1988, MIS Q..

[48]  R. Ashton,et al.  Students As Surrogates In Behavioral Accounting Research - Some Evidence , 1980 .

[49]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[50]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Using a GDSS to Facilitate Group Consensus: Some Intended and Unintended Consequences , 1988, MIS Q..

[51]  Kwok Kee Wei,et al.  Interacting effects of GDSS and leadership , 1994, Decis. Support Syst..

[52]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision making: effects of minority influence , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[54]  D. Myers,et al.  The group polarization phenomenon. , 1976 .

[55]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[56]  John J. Leggett,et al.  Computer-supported co-operative work: research issues for the 90s , 1993, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[57]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Reevaluating media richness: cues, feedback, and task , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[58]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  A Fuzzy Analysis of Consensus in Small Groups , 1980 .

[59]  Lucy Zinkiewicz,et al.  Member Preferences for Discussion Content in Anticipated Group Decisions: Effects of Type of issue and Group Interactive Goal , 1994 .

[60]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations , 1995 .

[61]  Dorwin Cartwright,et al.  Determinants of scientific progress: The case of research on the risky shift. , 1973 .

[62]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Computer-Based Support for Group Problem-Finding: An Experimental Investigation , 1988, MIS Q..

[63]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  The Effects of Variations in Capabilities of GDSS Designs on Management of Cognitive Conflict in Groups , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[64]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Comparison of Laboratory and Field Research in the Study of Electronic Meeting Systems , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[65]  Monica J. Garfield,et al.  The Adoption and Use of GSS in Project Teams: Toward More Participative Processes and Outcomes , 2003, MIS Q..

[66]  J. McGrath.  Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[67]  Barbara A. Gutek,et al.  Work group structure and information technology: a structural contingency approach , 1990 .

[68]  I. Benbasat,et al.  The Effects of Group, Task,Context, and Technology Variables on the Usefulness of Group Support Systems , 1993 .

[69]  David G. Myers,et al.  Group-Induced Polarization of Attitudes and Behavior , 1978 .

[70]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Empirical Research in Managerial Support Systems: A Review and Assessment , 1993 .

[71]  D. Isenberg.  Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. , 1986 .

[72]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Supporting virtual team-building with a GSS: an empirical investigation , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[73]  Leonard M. Jessup,et al.  The Effects of Anonymity on GDSS Group Process with an Idea-Generating Task , 1990, MIS Q..

[74]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Technology for intellectual teamwork: perspectives on research and design , 1990 .