Detecting coevolving positions in a molecule: why and how to account for phylogeny
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] G. Stormo,et al. Identifying constraints on the higher-order structure of RNA: continued development and application of comparative sequence analysis methods. , 1992, Nucleic acids research.
[2] C. Sander,et al. Can three-dimensional contacts in protein structures be predicted by analysis of correlated mutations? , 1994, Protein engineering.
[3] W R Taylor,et al. Coevolving protein residues: maximum likelihood identification and relationship to structure. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.
[4] David Haussler,et al. Detecting Coevolution in and among Protein Domains , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[5] Itay Mayrose,et al. Rate4Site: an algorithmic tool for the identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of evolutionary determinants within their homologues , 2002, ISMB.
[6] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[7] W. Atchley,et al. Correlations among amino acid sites in bHLH protein domains: an information theoretic analysis. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.
[8] O. Gascuel,et al. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. , 2003, Systematic biology.
[9] Simon A. A. Travers,et al. A Novel Method for Detecting Intramolecular Coevolution: Adding a Further Dimension to Selective Constraints Analyses , 2006, Genetics.
[10] P. Tuff,et al. Exploring a phylogenetic approach for the detection of correlated substitutions in proteins. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.
[11] Stefan M. Larson,et al. Analysis of covariation in an SH3 domain sequence alignment: applications in tertiary contact prediction and the design of compensating hydrophobic core substitutions. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.
[12] C. Sander,et al. Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins , 1994, Proteins.
[13] Gaurav Tyagi,et al. Functionally compensating coevolving positions are neither homoplasic nor conserved in clades. , 2010, Molecular biology and evolution.
[14] B. Woolf,et al. THE LOG LIKELIHOOD RATIO TEST (THE G‐TEST) , 1957, Annals of human genetics.
[15] David Haussler,et al. Detecting the coevolution of biosequences--an example of RNA interaction prediction. , 2007, Molecular biology and evolution.
[16] Gregory B. Gloor,et al. Mutual information without the influence of phylogeny or entropy dramatically improves residue contact prediction , 2008, Bioinform..
[17] Eric Westhof,et al. Base pairing constraints drive structural epistasis in ribosomal RNA sequences. , 2010, Molecular biology and evolution.
[18] Nan Yu,et al. The Comparative RNA Web (CRW) Site: an online database of comparative sequence and structure information for ribosomal, intron, and other RNAs , 2002, BMC Bioinformatics.
[19] Julien Dutheil,et al. Detecting groups of coevolving positions in a molecule: a clustering approach , 2007, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[20] J. Dutheil,et al. Non-homogeneous models of sequence evolution in the Bio++ suite of libraries and programs , 2008, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[21] L. C. Martin,et al. Using information theory to search for co-evolving residues in proteins , 2005, Bioinform..
[22] R. Ranganathan,et al. Evolutionarily conserved pathways of energetic connectivity in protein families. , 1999, Science.
[23] Thomas W. H. Lui,et al. Using multiple interdependency to separate functional from phylogenetic correlations in protein alignments , 2003, Bioinform..
[24] Sarel J. Fleishman,et al. An evolutionarily conserved network of amino acids mediates gating in voltage-dependent potassium channels. , 2004 .
[25] E. Neher. How frequent are correlated changes in families of protein sequences? , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[26] Thomas Lengauer,et al. ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R , 2005, Bioinform..
[27] E. Tillier,et al. Neighbor Joining and Maximum Likelihood with RNA Sequences: Addressing the Interdependence of Sites , 1995 .
[28] W. Atchley,et al. Separation of phylogenetic and functional associations in biological sequences by using the parametric bootstrap. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[29] Rob Knight,et al. Detecting coevolution without phylogenetic trees? Tree-ignorant metrics of coevolution perform as well as tree-aware metrics , 2008, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[30] Anders Gorm Pedersen,et al. Finding coevolving amino acid residues using row and column weighting of mutual information and multi-dimensional amino acid representation , 2007, Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB.
[31] Pierre Baldi,et al. Assessing the accuracy of prediction algorithms for classification: an overview , 2000, Bioinform..
[32] A. Lesk,et al. Correlation of co-ordinated amino acid substitutions with function in viruses related to tobacco mosaic virus. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.
[33] Matthew W. Dimmic,et al. Detecting coevolving amino acid sites using Bayesian mutational mapping , 2005, ISMB.
[34] K. Nagai,et al. Coordinated amino acid changes in homologous protein families. , 1988, Protein engineering.
[35] Cristina Marino Buslje,et al. Correction for phylogeny, small number of observations and data redundancy improves the identification of coevolving amino acid pairs using mutual information , 2009, Bioinform..
[36] I. Olkin,et al. The Log Likelihood Ratio Test (the g-test). Methods and Tables for Tests of Heterogeneity in Contingency Tables , 1958 .
[37] Tom Fawcett,et al. An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..
[38] A. Jean-Marie,et al. A model-based approach for detecting coevolving positions in a molecule. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.
[39] D. Haussler,et al. Using multiple alignments and phylogenetic trees to detect RNA secondary structure. , 1996, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.
[40] G. Gloor,et al. Mutual information in protein multiple sequence alignments reveals two classes of coevolving positions. , 2005, Biochemistry.