Workplace innovation for better jobs and performance

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to describe the need for workplace innovation policies and practices in Europe and evaluate programs that already have been developed. Design/methodology/approach - The paper describes the concept of workplace innovation and trends in society explaining its emergence. The paper then presents and discusses the results of evaluation research as far as this is available. Findings - A growing number of countries is conducting or developing some kind of programme on workplace innovation. These programmes differ in size and governance. Evaluation research shows that simultaneous improvement of performance and quality of working life is possible under certain conditions such as the participation of employees in change projects. Research limitations/implications - Concepts and designs of evaluation research projects differ considerably. This gives new challenges for companies, trade unions, governments and researchers. In EU2020, little attention is paid to workplace innovation but there is a ray of hope in the draft integrated guidelines for employment policies and in the Flagship Initiative Innovation Union. Originality/value - Social innovation in the workplace, or workplace innovation, is a new concept, covering to some extent new practices that appear to be relevant for organisations and governments.

[1]  Derek C. Jones,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON FIRM PRODUCTIVITY - PRELIMINARY EVIDENCE FROM FINLAND , 2008 .

[2]  Elise Ramstad,et al.  Promoting performance and the quality of working life simultaneously , 2009 .

[3]  Dario Pozzoli,et al.  Workplace practices and firm performance in manufacturing: A comparative study of Italy and Britain , 2010 .

[4]  F. Damanpour,et al.  Combinative Effects of Innovation Types and Organizational Performance: A Longitudinal Study of Service Organizations , 2009 .

[5]  T. Kochan,et al.  Workplace Innovation and Labor Policy Leadership A Challenge to Business, Labor, and Government , 2009 .

[6]  Stephen Roper,et al.  Organizing innovation: Complementarities between cross-functional teams , 2009 .

[7]  F. Pot,et al.  Quality of working life and organizational performance--two sides of the same coin? , 2009, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[8]  Anne Delarue,et al.  Teamworking and Organizational Performance: A Review of Survey-Based Research , 2008 .

[9]  Anneke Goudswaard,et al.  Good practice guide to internal flexibility policies in companies , 2009 .

[10]  S. Frenkel,et al.  Do High Performance Work Practices Work in South Korea? , 2010 .

[11]  Peter Totterdill,et al.  Action Research in Workplace Innovation and Regional Development , 2004 .

[12]  Sandra Janoff,et al.  Faster, Shorter, Cheaper May Be Simple; It’s Never Easy , 2005 .

[13]  Antti Kauhanen,et al.  Workplace Innovations and Employee Outcomes: Evidence from Finland , 2008 .

[14]  Olivier Serrat,et al.  Harnessing Creativity and Innovation in the Workplace , 2009 .