Needle deflection and tissue sampling length in needle biopsy.

This study investigates the effect of needle tip geometry on the needle deflection and tissue sampling length in biopsy. Advances in medical imaging have allowed the identification of suspicious cancerous lesions which then require needle biopsy for tissue sampling and subsequent confirmatory pathological analysis. Precise needle insertion and adequate tissue sampling are essential for accurate cancer diagnosis and individualized treatment decisions. However, the single-bevel needles in current hand-held biopsy devices often deflect significantly during needle insertion, causing variance in the targeted and actual locations of the sampled tissue. This variance can lead to inaccurate sampling and false-negative results. There is also a limited understanding of factors affecting the tissue sampling length which is a critical component of accurate cancer diagnosis. This study compares the needle deflection and tissue sampling length between the existing single-bevel and exploratory multi-bevel needle tip geometries. A coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian finite element analysis was applied to understand the needle-tissue interaction during needle insertion. The needle deflection and tissue sampling length were experimentally studied using tissue-mimicking phantoms and ex-vivo tissue, respectively. This study reveals that the tissue separation location at the needle tip affects both needle deflection and tissue sampling length. By varying the tissue separation location and creating a multi-bevel needle tip geometry, the bending moments induced by the insertion forces can be altered to reduce the needle deflection. However, the tissue separation location also affects the tissue contact inside the needle groove, potentially reducing the tissue sampling length. A multi-bevel needle tip geometry with the tissue separation point below the needle groove face may reduce the needle deflection while maintaining a long tissue sampling length. Results from this study can guide needle tip design to enable the precise needle deployment and adequate tissue sampling for the needle biopsy procedures.

[1]  Etta D Pisano,et al.  Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. , 2012, JAMA.

[2]  Enrico Filippi,et al.  Finite element modelling of 3D orthogonal cutting experimental tests with the Coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian (CEL) formulation , 2017 .

[3]  Rajni V. Patel,et al.  Minimization of needle deflection in robot‐assisted percutaneous therapy , 2007, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[4]  David Y. Lu,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy for prediction of final prostate pathology. , 2014, The Journal of urology.

[5]  J. Clain,et al.  Preliminary experience with an EUS-guided trucut biopsy needle compared with EUS-guided FNA. , 2003, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[6]  Volker Seifert,et al.  Intraoperative MRI guidance and extent of resection in glioma surgery: a randomised, controlled trial. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[7]  Dan Stoianovici,et al.  Multi-Imager Compatible, MR Safe, Remote Center of Motion Needle-Guide Robot , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  H Ballentine Carter,et al.  Complications after prostate biopsy: data from SEER-Medicare. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[10]  Heinz-Peter Schlemmer,et al.  MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic performance in men with elevated or increasing PSA levels after previous negative TRUS biopsies. , 2006, European urology.

[11]  J. Fütterer,et al.  Can Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Be Detected with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A Systematic Review of the Literature. , 2015, European urology.

[12]  A. Sidana,et al.  Missing the Mark: Prostate Cancer Upgrading by Systematic Biopsy over Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy , 2017, The Journal of urology.

[13]  Heinz-Peter Schlemmer,et al.  Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[14]  Tae-Min Kim,et al.  Regional biases in mutation screening due to intratumoural heterogeneity of prostate cancer , 2014, The Journal of pathology.

[15]  Peter Kazanzides,et al.  Robotic assistance for ultrasound-guided prostate brachytherapy , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[16]  Jürgen Grabe,et al.  Application of a Coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian approach on geomechanical problems involving large deformations , 2011 .

[17]  Zhen Xu,et al.  Polyvinyl chloride as a multimodal tissue-mimicking material with tuned mechanical and medical imaging properties. , 2016, Medical physics.

[18]  Shyam Natarajan,et al.  MRI–ultrasound fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsy , 2013, Current opinion in urology.

[19]  T. Podder,et al.  EFFECTS OF TIP GEOMETRY OF SURGICAL NEEDLES: AN ASSESSMENT OF FORCE AND DEFLECTION , 2005 .

[20]  M. Hochman,et al.  Bone and soft-tissue lesions: what factors affect diagnostic yield of image-guided core-needle biopsy? , 2008, Radiology.

[21]  Carl S McGill,et al.  Effects of insertion speed and trocar stiffness on the accuracy of needle position for brachytherapy. , 2012, Medical physics.

[22]  Karsten Berns,et al.  Intelligent Autonomous Systems 13 - Proceedings of the 13th International Conference IAS-13, Padova, Italy, July 15-18, 2014 , 2016, IAS.

[23]  A. Rosenkrantz,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy in a Consecutive Cohort of Men with No Previous Biopsy: Reduction of Over Detection through Improved Risk Stratification. , 2015, The Journal of urology.

[24]  D. Lifshitz,et al.  Assessment of Needle Tip Deflection During Transrectal Guided Prostate Biopsy: Implications for Targeted Biopsies. , 2017, Journal of endourology.

[25]  Rajni V. Patel,et al.  Needle insertion into soft tissue: a survey. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[26]  E. Cholongitas,et al.  Transjugular liver biopsy--indications, adequacy, quality of specimens, and complications--a systematic review. , 2007, Journal of hepatology.

[27]  Albert J. Shih,et al.  An Experimental Method of Needle Deflection and Prostate Movement Using the Anatomically Accurate Prostate Simulator and the Electromagnetic Tracking System , 2017 .

[28]  A. Shih,et al.  Effects of needle inner surface topography on friction and biopsy length , 2016 .

[29]  G. Fichtinger,et al.  Development and Evaluation of an Actuated MRI-Compatible Robotic System for MRI-Guided Prostate Intervention , 2013, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[30]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. , 2015, JAMA.

[31]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Robotic needle insertion: effects of friction and needle geometry , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[32]  D. Nieboer,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, European urology.

[33]  K. T. Ramesh,et al.  Needle-tissue interaction forces for bevel-tip steerable needles , 2008, 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[34]  G. Tse,et al.  Role of fine needle aspiration and tru cut biopsy in diagnosis of mucinous carcinoma of breast--from a radiologist's perspective. , 2006, Clinical imaging.

[35]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Force modeling for needle insertion into soft tissue , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  Shyam Natarajan,et al.  Prostate cancer detection with magnetic resonance‐ultrasound fusion biopsy: The role of systematic and targeted biopsies , 2016, Cancer.

[37]  Jenny Dankelman,et al.  The influence of tip shape on bending force during needle insertion , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[38]  Jenny Dankelman,et al.  Needle-tissue interaction forces--a survey of experimental data. , 2012, Medical engineering & physics.

[39]  R. Memo,et al.  Shear Wave Ultrasound Elastography of the Prostate: Initial Results , 2012, Ultrasound quarterly.

[40]  Pierre Mozer,et al.  Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review. , 2015, European urology.

[41]  Deflection Analysis of Different Needle Designs for Prostate Biopsy and Focal Therapy , 2017, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[42]  Jason Z Moore,et al.  Novel needle cutting edge geometry for end-cut biopsy. , 2011, Medical physics.

[43]  T. Lee,et al.  Needle Deflection Studies for Optimal Insertion Modeling , 2013 .

[44]  Gabor Fichtinger,et al.  Needle deflection estimation: prostate brachytherapy phantom experiments , 2014, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[45]  O. Hélénon,et al.  Ultrasound elastography of the prostate: state of the art. , 2013, Diagnostic and interventional imaging.

[46]  G.S. Fischer,et al.  A System for MRI-guided Prostate Interventions , 2006, The First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2006. BioRob 2006..

[47]  D. Stoianovici,et al.  Robotic image-guided needle interventions of the prostate. , 2009, Reviews in urology.