Distinct Impact of Information Access Patterns on Supplier's Non-contractible Investments and Adaptation for Supply Chain Agility

This study explores how distinct information access patterns affect a supplier’s supply chain agility. A supplier’s specific investments for IT-enabled supply chain coordination and relational adaptation in supply chain operations are identified as the technical and behavioral antecedents to its supply chain agility. Because both are non-contractible elements in formal contracts and complementary to buyer’s supply chain coordination information and buyer’s specific investments in monitoring and control, either buyer or supplier may hold up their counterpart based on their own information assets. Therefore, this study draws on the theory of incomplete contracts and suggests that both buyer and supplier need to make their idiosyncratic information assets alienable and accessible to their counterpart so that the rent-seeking problem can be alleviated and the supplier’s investment and adaptation incentives improved. This study contributes to the literature by demonstrating that distinct information access patterns can improve a supplier’s supply chain agility through the mediation of the non-contractible investments and adaptation made by the supplier.

[1]  L. Telser A Theory of Self-enforcing Agreements , 1980 .

[2]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[3]  E. Christiaanse,et al.  Interorganizational adaptation in supply chains: a behavioral perspective , 2007 .

[4]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Decentralized Multi-Echelon Supply Chains: Incentives and Information , 1999 .

[5]  Vineet Padmanabhan,et al.  Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect" , 1997, Manag. Sci..

[6]  Kevin Zhu,et al.  Research Note - Information Technology in Supply Chains: The Value of IT-Enabled Resources Under Competition , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Nagesh N. Murthy,et al.  The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: Scale development and model testing , 2006 .

[8]  Four Formal(Izable) Theories of the Firm? , 2004 .

[9]  Michael J. Braunscheidel,et al.  The organizational antecedents of a firm’s supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response , 2009 .

[10]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  IT and business process outsourcing: the knowledge potential , 2004 .

[11]  Mani Subramani,et al.  How Do Suppliers Benefit from Information Technology Use in Supply Chain Relationships? , 2004, MIS Q..

[12]  Kevin J. Murphy,et al.  Relational Contracts and the Theory of the Firm , 1997 .

[13]  Luigi Zingales,et al.  Power in a Theory of the Firm , 1996 .

[14]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Measuring Firm Performance at the Network Level: A Nomology of the Business Impact of Digital Supply Networks , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Eric W.T. Ngai,et al.  The role of supplier operational adaptation on the performance of IT-enabled transport logistics under environmental uncertainty , 2009 .

[16]  M. Christopher The Agile Supply Chain : Competing in Volatile Markets , 2000 .

[17]  Joseph P. Cannon,et al.  Buyer–Seller Relationships in Business Markets , 1999 .

[18]  Mark A. Vonderembse,et al.  Value chain flexibility: A dichotomy of competence and capability , 2002 .

[19]  H. Simon,et al.  A Formal Theory of the Employment Relationship , 1951 .

[20]  B. Klein,et al.  The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance , 1981, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  H. Demsetz,et al.  Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization , 1975, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[22]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Coordinating for Flexibility in e-Business Supply Chains , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[23]  A. Mukherji,et al.  Mutual adaptation in buyer–supplier relationships , 2008 .

[24]  O. Hart,et al.  Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[25]  S. Borgatti,et al.  A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms , 1997 .

[26]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Information assets, technology, and organization , 1994 .

[27]  Sanford J. Grossman,et al.  The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration , 1986 .

[28]  C. Bull The Existence of Self-Enforcing Implicit Contracts , 1987 .

[29]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  Interfirm Monitoring, Social Contracts, and Relationship Outcomes , 2007 .

[30]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[31]  Josef Windsperger,et al.  Allocation of decision rights in joint ventures , 2009 .

[32]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[33]  Eric Overby,et al.  Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..