‘What I see is not what you get’: why culture-specific behaviours for virtual characters should be user-tested across cultures

Integrating culture into the behavioural models of virtual characters requires knowledge from very different disciplines such as cross-cultural psychology and computer science. If culture-related behavioural differences are simulated with a virtual character system, users might not necessarily understand the intent of the designer. This is, in part, due to the influence of culture on not only users, but also designers. To gain a greater understanding of the instantiation of culture in the behaviour of virtual characters, and on this potential mismatch between designer and user, we have conducted two experiments. In these experiments, we tried to simulate one dimension of culture (Masculinity vs. Femininity) in the behaviour of virtual characters. We created four scenarios in the first experiment and six in the second. In each of these scenarios, the same two characters interact with each other. The verbal and non-verbal behaviour of these characters differs depending on their cultural scripts. In two user perception studies, we investigated how these differences are judged by human participants with different cultural backgrounds. Besides expected differences between participants from Masculine and Feminine countries, we found significant differences in perception between participants from Individualistic and Collectivistic countries. We also found that the user’s interpretation of the character’s motivation had a significant influence on the perception of the scenarios. Based on our findings, we give recommendations for researchers that aim to design culture-specific behaviours for virtual characters.

[1]  Peter B. Smith When elephants fight, the grass gets trampled: the GLOBE and Hofstede projects , 2006 .

[2]  Stacy Marsella,et al.  The DARWARS Tactical Language Training System , 2004 .

[3]  Peter Huber,et al.  Individualized Agent Interactions , 2011, MIG.

[4]  D. Byrne The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[5]  Tomoko Koda,et al.  Cross-Cultural Study on Facial Regions as Cues to Recognize Emotions of Virtual Agents , 2010, Culture and Computing.

[6]  C. Mora Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival , 2013 .

[7]  W. Lewis Johnson,et al.  Tactical Language and Culture Training Systems: Using Artificial Intelligence to Teach Foreign Languages and Cultures , 2008, AAAI.

[8]  Paula J. Durlach,et al.  BiLAT: A Game-Based Environment for Practicing Negotiation in a Cultural Context , 2009, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[9]  Gert Jan Hofstede,et al.  Exploring Culture: Exercises, Stories and Synthetic Cultures , 2002 .

[10]  Elisabeth André,et al.  Cross-Cultural Evaluations of Avatar Facial Expressions Designed by Western Designers , 2008, IVA.

[11]  David G. Novick,et al.  A Computational Model of Culture-Specific Conversational Behavior , 2007, IVA.

[12]  Elisabeth André,et al.  Planning Small Talk behavior with cultural influences for multiagent systems , 2011, Comput. Speech Lang..

[13]  Joseph Luft,et al.  Group Processes: An Introduction to Group Dynamics , 1963 .

[14]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Using rituals to express cultural differences in synthetic characters , 2009, AAMAS.

[15]  Ana Paiva,et al.  But that was in another country: agents and intercultural empathy , 2009, AAMAS.

[16]  Yukiko I. Nakano,et al.  Culture-related differences in aspects of behavior for virtual characters across Germany and Japan , 2011, AAMAS.

[17]  Gert Jan Hofstede,et al.  Cultures and Organizations - Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival (3. ed.) , 2010 .