Electrodiagnostic features of the Guillain‐Barré syndrome

We compared the diagnostic sensitivity of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and F waves with peripheral motor and sensory nerve conduction studies in 15 patients with the Guillain-Barré syndrome. All 4 types of studies were performed on 44 nerves (17 median, 12 ulnar, and 15 lower extremity). In the lower extremities, we used the peroneal nerves for all types of study except peripheral sensory conduction studies, which were performed on the sural nerve. We detected abnormalities by peripheral motor conduction studies in 33 of 44 nerves, by F waves in 31, by SEPs in 23, and by peripheral sensory conduction in 17. The cumulative sensitivity increased with the testing of multiple nerves by motor nerve conduction, sensory nerve conduction, and F-wave studies, but not with multiple SEPs. F-wave studies were significantly more sensitive than SEPs in identifying abnormalities. Thus, the recording of SEPs is indicated for diagnosis of the Guillain-Barré syndrome only if peripheral nerve conduction and F-wave studies are normal.

[1]  N. Murray,et al.  PROXIMAL CONDUCTION BLOCK IN EARLY GUILLAIN-BARRÉ SYNDROME , 1985, The Lancet.

[2]  J. Albers,et al.  Sequential electrodiagnostic abnormalities in acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy , 1985, Muscle & nerve.

[3]  W. Brown,et al.  Conduction block and denervation in Guillain-Barré polyneuropathy. , 1984, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  W. Brown,et al.  Sensory evoked potentials in Guillain-Barré polyneuropathy. , 1984, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[5]  J. Mcleod,et al.  Abnormalities of proximal conduction in acute idiopathic polyneuritis: comparison of short latency evoked potentials and F-waves. , 1984, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[6]  American Electroencephalographic Society. Guidelines for clinical evoked potential studies. , 1984, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[7]  J. Mcleod,et al.  Electrophysiological studies in the Guillain‐Barré syndrome , 1981, Annals of neurology.

[8]  B. Shahani,et al.  Late responses as aids to diagnosis in peripheral neuropathy. , 1980, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[9]  J Kimura,et al.  Proximal versus distal slowing of motor nerve conduction velocity in the Guillain‐Barré syndrome , 1978, Annals of neurology.

[10]  C. Poser Criteria for diagnosis of Guillain-Barré syndrome. , 1978, Annals of neurology.

[11]  A. Eisen,et al.  The Guillain-Barré syndrome. A clinical and electrodiagnostic study of 25 cases. , 1974, Archives of neurology.