See before you jump: full recognition of parafoveal words precedes skips during reading.

Serial attention models of eye-movement control during reading were evaluated in an eye-tracking experiment that examined how lexical activation combines with visual information in the parafovea to affect word skipping (where a word is not fixated during first-pass reading). Lexical activation was manipulated by repetition priming created through prime-target pairs embedded within a sentence. The boundary technique (Rayner, 1975) was used to determine whether the target word was fully available during parafoveal preview or whether it was available with transposed letters (e.g., Herman changed to Hreman). With full parafoveal preview, the target word was skipped more frequently when it matched the earlier prime word (i.e., was repeated) than when it did not match the earlier prime word (i.e., was new). With transposed-letter (TL) preview, repetition had no effect on skipping rates despite the great similarity of the TL preview string to the target word and substantial evidence that TL strings activate the words from which they are derived (Perea & Lupker, 2003). These results show that lexically based skipping is based on full recognition of the letter string in parafoveal preview and does not involve using the contextual constraint to compensate for the reduced information available from the parafovea. These results are consistent with models of eye-movement control during reading in which successive words in a text are processed 1 at a time (serially) and in which word recognition strongly influences eye movements.

[1]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. , 2005, Psychological review.

[2]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  S. Lupker,et al.  Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[4]  A. Kennedy,et al.  Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading , 2005, Vision Research.

[5]  K. Rayner,et al.  Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading , 1981 .

[6]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Eye movements when reading transposed text: the importance of word-beginning letters. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  G. Underwood Cognitive processes in eye guidance , 2005 .

[8]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye Movements in Reading: Perceptual and Language Processes , 1985 .

[9]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing. , 1978, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Priming in Sentence Processing: Intralexical Spreading Activation, Schemas, and Situation Models , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[11]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Mindless reading: Eye-movement characteristics are similar in scanning letter strings and reading texts , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  P. Gordon,et al.  Coreference and lexical repetition: Mechanisms of discourse integration , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[14]  K. Rayner,et al.  Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of a text. , 1995, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[17]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Fixation durations before word skipping in reading , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  K. Rayner,et al.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[19]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Parafoveal processing in reading: Manipulating n+1 and n+2 previews simultaneously , 2008, Visual cognition.

[20]  Ronan G. Reilly,et al.  Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading , 2006, Cognitive Systems Research.

[21]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  Eye Movement Control , 2014, Journal of ophthalmology.

[23]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[24]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Eye movements in reading: Old questions and new directions , 2004 .

[25]  D. Balota,et al.  The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Eye movements in reading and information processing : , 2015 .

[28]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes , 1989 .

[29]  D. Balota,et al.  Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  Sarah J. White,et al.  Raeding Wrods With Jubmled Lettres , 2006, Psychological science.

[31]  K. Rayner The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  Françoise Vitu,et al.  Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading , 1998 .

[33]  J. Henderson,et al.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998, Psychological review.

[35]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  17 – What Your Eyes Do while Your Mind Is Reading1 , 1983 .