Simple Guidelines to Prepare Forests for Global Change: The Dog and the Frisbee

Abstract Most suggestions for adapting forest management in times of rapid global change have focused on tree regeneration, mortality, and productivity under predicted future climates. Adaptation to other aspects of global change, such as invasive species or changes in social settings, has received much less attention, which may be partially due to the high unpredictability of such events. Based on a review of recent silvicultural practices and ecological theory with a special emphasis on complex adaptive systems, we propose three guidelines for increasing the likelihood that forests will provide desired levels of a variety of ecosystem services in an increasingly variable and uncertain future. Basically, the guidelines promote a system level instead of the traditional command and control approach (sensu Holling and Meffe 1996) to silviculture. They are based on the well-supported ecological notions that having a high diversity and redundancy of key elements that are well connected across spatial, temporal, and organizational scales will allow forests to adapt on their own in response to predictable and unpredictable perturbations without the need for major management interventions. The guidelines encourage the maintenance of stand structural and compositional diversity at multiple spatial and temporal scales, thus reinforcing cross-hierarchical interactions in ecosystems, with an emphasis on encouraging self-organization. We provide examples of silvicultural practices as they relate to these guidelines.

[1]  Frederick J. Swanson,et al.  CONSERVING BIODIVERSITY IN MANAGED FORESTS : LESSONS FROM NATURAL FORESTS , 1991 .

[2]  Rodney J. Keenan,et al.  Climate change impacts and adaptation in forest management: a review , 2015, Annals of Forest Science.

[3]  F. Fernandez-Mendez,et al.  Functional diversity criteria for selecting urban trees , 2019, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

[4]  Julia I. Burton,et al.  Multiscale Controls on Natural Regeneration Dynamics after Partial Overstory Removal in Douglas-Fir Forests in Western Oregon, USA , 2014 .

[5]  Jerry F. Franklin,et al.  Tree Seedlings on Logs in Picea‐Tsuga Forests of Oregon and Washington , 1989 .

[6]  A. Moldenke,et al.  Importance of habitat structure to the arthropod food-web in Douglas-fir canopies , 2000 .

[7]  C. Holling,et al.  Command and Control and the Pathology of Natural Resource Management , 1996 .

[8]  K. Puettmann,et al.  Patterns of growth compensation in eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.): the influence of herbivory intensity and competitive environments , 2001, Oecologia.

[9]  Roger A. Sedjo The potential of high-yield plantation forestry for meeting timber needs , 1999 .

[10]  J. Agee,et al.  Reform forest fire management , 2015, Science.

[11]  D. Binkley Ecosystem production in Douglas-fir plantations: Interaction of red alder and site fertility , 1983 .

[12]  Sigrid Stagl,et al.  See Blockindiscussions, Blockinstats, Blockinand Blockinauthor Blockinprofiles Blockinfor Blockinthis Blockinpublication Managing Blockincomplex Blockinadaptive Blockinsystems Blockin— Blockina Blockinco- Evolutionary Blockinperspective Blockinon Blockinnatural Blockinresource Management , 2022 .

[13]  S. Simard The foundational role of mycorrhizal networks in self-organization of interior Douglas-fir forests , 2009 .

[14]  Robert J. Pabst,et al.  Structure and composition of unmanaged riparian forests in the coastal mountains of Oregon, U.S.A. , 1999 .

[15]  K. Puettmann,et al.  Development of Tree and Understory Vegetation in Young Douglas-Fir Plantations in Western Oregon , 2006 .

[16]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  Plant functional types: are we getting any closer to the Holy Grail? , 2007 .

[17]  R. Kasten Dumroese,et al.  Preparing for climate change: Forestry and assisted migration , 2013 .

[18]  S. Simard,et al.  Mycorrhizal networks and distance from mature trees alter patterns of competition and facilitation in dry Douglas-fir forests , 2008, Oecologia.

[19]  A. Lugo,et al.  Climate Change and Forest Disturbances , 2001 .

[20]  R. DeFries,et al.  Ecosystem management as a wicked problem , 2017, Science.

[21]  J. Tappeiner,et al.  Managing for biodiversity in young Douglas-fir forests of western Oregon , 2002 .

[22]  A. Ares,et al.  Understory abundance, species diversity and functional attribute response to thinning in coniferous stands , 2010 .

[23]  B. S. Goh,et al.  Stability and diversity in mathematical models of ecosystems , 2009 .

[24]  J. Franklin,et al.  Multiple successional pathways and precocity in forest development: can some forests be born complex? , 2012 .

[25]  S. Hagerman,et al.  Responding to climate change in forest management: two decades of recommendations , 2018, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

[26]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  The forgotten stage of forest succession: early-successional ecosystems on forest sites , 2011 .

[27]  T. Kolb,et al.  Managing climate change adaptation in forests: a case study from the U.S. Southwest , 2013 .

[28]  K. Puettmann,et al.  Natural Regeneration in Thinned Douglas-fir Stands in Western Oregon , 2008 .

[29]  Klaus J. Puettmann,et al.  Restoring the Adaptive Capacity of Forest Ecosystems , 2014 .

[30]  Charles D. Canham,et al.  Causes and consequences of resource heterogeneity in forests : interspecific variation in light transmission by canopy trees , 1994 .

[31]  T. Spies,et al.  MICROSITE CONTROLS ON TREE SEEDLING ESTABLISHMENT IN CONIFER FOREST CANOPY GAPS , 1997 .

[32]  Christian Messier,et al.  Can forest management based on natural disturbances maintain ecological resilience , 2006 .

[33]  T. Auld,et al.  Persistence of obligate-seeding species at the population scale: effects of fire intensity, fire patchiness and long fire-free intervals , 2006 .

[34]  S. Levin The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[35]  S. Levin Ecosystems and the Biosphere as Complex Adaptive Systems , 1998, Ecosystems.

[36]  K. Puettmann,et al.  Managing for adaptive capacity : thinning improves food availability for wildlife and insect pollinators under climate change conditions , 2013 .

[37]  A. Ares,et al.  Early responses to thinning treatments designed to accelerate late successional forest structure in young coniferous stands of western Oregon, USA , 2012 .

[38]  J. Hagar,et al.  Herbicides and herbivory interact to drive plant community and crop-tree establishment. , 2018, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[39]  D. Herms,et al.  Emerald ash borer invasion of North America: history, biology, ecology, impacts, and management. , 2014, Annual review of entomology.

[40]  Lauren Ancel Meyers,et al.  Fighting change with change: adaptive variation in an uncertain world , 2002 .

[41]  D. Peterson,et al.  Forest responses to climate change in the northwestern United States: Ecophysiological foundations for adaptive management , 2011 .

[42]  W. Keeton,et al.  DO REMNANT OLD‐GROWTH TREES ACCELERATE RATES OF SUCCESSION IN MATURE DOUGLAS‐FIR FORESTS? , 2005 .

[43]  K. Puettmann,et al.  Trends in North American and European regeneration research under the ecosystem management paradigm , 2006, European Journal of Forest Research.

[44]  Douglas A. Maguire,et al.  Silviculture and Swiss needle cast : research and recommendations , 2000 .

[45]  Erin K. Grey,et al.  Implications for U.S. Trade and Nonindigenous Species Risk Resulting from Increased Economic Integration of the Asia-Pacific Region , 2018 .

[46]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  Responses of insect pests, pathogens, and invasive plant species to climate change in the forests of northeastern North America: what can we predict? , 2009 .

[47]  M. Fortin,et al.  The functional complex network approach to foster forest resilience to global changes , 2019, Forest Ecosystems.

[48]  F. Swanson,et al.  LANDSCAPE PATTERN RESPONSE TO CHANGES IN PATTERN GENERATION RULES: LAND-USE LEGACIES IN FORESTRY , 1994 .

[49]  D. Spittlehouse,et al.  Adaptation to climate change in forest management , 2004, Journal of Ecosystems and Management.

[50]  D. Rizzo,et al.  First Report of Phytophthora ramorum on Douglas-Fir in California. , 2002, Plant disease.

[51]  Robert E. Keane,et al.  Cascading effects of fire exclusion in Rocky Mountain ecosystems: a literature review , 2002 .

[52]  K. Puettmann,et al.  Managing for adaptive capacity: thinning improves food availability for wildlife and insect pollinators under climate change conditions , 2013 .

[53]  R. Rose,et al.  Twelfth-year response of Douglas-fir to area of weed control and herbaceous versus woody weed control treatments , 2006 .

[54]  Lael Parrott,et al.  Viewing forests through the lens of complex systems science , 2014 .

[55]  G. E. Hemery,et al.  Forest Management and Silvicultural Responses to Projected Climate Change Impacts on European Broadleaved Trees and Forests , 2008 .

[56]  Raul Rosenvald,et al.  For what, when, and where is green-tree retention better than clear-cutting? A review of the biodiversity aspects , 2008 .

[57]  A. Kirilenko,et al.  Climate change impacts on forestry , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  J. Tappeiner,et al.  Multi-scale assessments highlight silvicultural opportunities to increase species diversity and spatial variability in forests , 2014 .

[59]  P. Soranno,et al.  Cross‐scale interactions: quantifying multi‐scaled cause–effect relationships in macrosystems , 2014 .

[60]  E. Hansen,et al.  Rate of increase of black-stain root disease in Douglas-fir plantations in Oregon and Washington , 1988 .

[61]  B. Enquist,et al.  Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[62]  R. Fogel,et al.  Contribution of mycorrhizae and soil fungi to nutrient cycling in a Douglas-fir ecosystem , 1983 .

[63]  T. Naaf,et al.  Effects of gap size, light and herbivory on the herb layer vegetation in European beech forest gaps , 2007 .

[64]  Alan B. Berg,et al.  Snag Characteristics and Dynamics in Douglas-Fir Forests, Western Oregon , 1980 .

[65]  Julia I. Burton,et al.  Forest Restoration Using Variable Density Thinning: Lessons from Douglas-Fir Stands in Western Oregon , 2016 .

[66]  S. Stephens,et al.  FEDERAL FOREST‐FIRE POLICY IN THE UNITED STATES , 2005 .

[67]  Chadwick Dearing Oliver,et al.  Crown stratification by species in even-aged mixed stands of Douglas-fir – western hemlock , 1979 .

[68]  M. Amoroso,et al.  Comparing productivity of pure and mixed Douglas-fir and western hemlock plantations in the Pacific Northwest , 2006 .

[69]  M. Battaglia,et al.  Adaptive Silviculture for Climate Change: A National Experiment in Manager-Scientist Partnerships to Apply an Adaptation Framework , 2017 .

[70]  P. Hulme Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization , 2009 .

[71]  J. Retana,et al.  Forest management for adaptation to climate change in the Mediterranean basin: A synthesis of evidence , 2018 .

[72]  J. Shogren,et al.  Public economics of hitchhiking species and tourism-based risk to ecosystem services , 2013 .

[73]  M. Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[74]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  Retention Forestry to Maintain Multifunctional Forests: A World Perspective , 2012 .

[75]  D. Hibbs,et al.  Conifer Regeneration after Forest Fire in the Klamath-Siskiyous: How Much, How Soon? , 2007 .

[76]  D. Hibbs,et al.  Effects of species mixtures on growth and stand development of Douglas-fir and red alder , 2006 .

[77]  S. Higgins,et al.  TRY – a global database of plant traits , 2011, Global Change Biology.

[78]  K. Puettmann,et al.  Patterns in spatial extent of gap influence on understory plant communities , 2008 .

[79]  H. Erickson,et al.  Tree growth at stand and individual scales in two dual-species mixture experiments in southern Washington State, USA , 2009 .

[80]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Nonnative forest insects and pathogens in the United States: Impacts and policy options , 2016, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[81]  J. Régnière,et al.  Climate Change and Bark Beetles of the Western United States and Canada: Direct and Indirect Effects , 2010 .

[82]  K. Puettmann Silvicultural Challenges and Options in the Context of Global Change: “Simple” Fixes and Opportunities for New Management Approaches , 2011 .

[83]  D. Hibbs,et al.  Regional constraints to biological nitrogen fixation in post-fire forest communities. , 2013, Ecology.

[84]  A. Haldane,et al.  The dog and the frisbee , 2012 .

[85]  K. McCann The diversity–stability debate , 2000, Nature.