Comparison of optical quality metrics to predict subjective quality of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: To compare wavefront‐derived metrics to predict subjective quality of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. METHODS: One month postoperatively, wavefront sensing was performed and overall subjective quality of vision assessed under 3 lighting conditions (photopic, high mesopic, low mesopic) with a questionnaire. Four wavefront‐error representations were computed for a pupil diameter of 6.0 mm and individual physiological pupil diameters at 0.4 lux: (1) the visual Strehl ratio based on optical transfer function (VSOTF), (2) the root‐mean‐square (RMS) value of Zernike orders 2 to 5 (total RMS), (3) higher‐order aberration (HOA) RMS, and (4) a wavefront‐error breakdown into the RMS of lower‐order aberrations, coma, spherical aberration, and remaining HOA. The impact of the postoperative wavefront error on subjective quality of vision was calculated using linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Fifty‐six eyes (29 patients) were included. The ability of wavefront error–derived metrics to predict subjective quality of vision was limited. The VSOTF, calculated for the best‐corrected eye, showed the highest predictability. Calculation of wavefront error for individual physiological pupil diameters did not improve predictive ability of the metrics. Eyes with a high theoretical retinal‐image quality had a high subjective quality of vision, and eyes with a low subjective quality of vision had a low theoretical image quality. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative wavefront error had limited influence on the subjective quality of vision. Postoperative retinal image quality should be kept as high as possible to provide good subjective quality of vision.

[1]  M. Netto,et al.  Wavefront-guided ablation: evidence for efficacy compared to traditional ablation. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  Konrad Pesudovs.  Single-value metrics of wavefront aberrationare we there yet? , 2004, Journal of refractive surgery.

[3]  R Brancato,et al.  Quality of Vision: A Consensus Building Initiative for a New Ophthalmologic Concept , 2006, European journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  D. Williams,et al.  Visibility of interference fringes near the resolution limit. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  Thomas Kohnen,et al.  The future role of wavefront-guided excimer ablation , 2007, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[6]  R. Nuijts,et al.  Minisection: Outcomes Studies Functional outcomes and patient satisfaction after laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia , 2005 .

[7]  T. Kohnen,et al.  Influence of pupil and optical zone diameter on higher‐order aberrations after wavefront‐guided myopic LASIK , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[8]  M. Chalita,et al.  Wavefront analysis in post-LASIK eyes and its correlation with visual symptoms, refraction, and topography. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[9]  T. Mihashi.  Higher-order wavefront aberrations induced by small ablation area and sub-clinical decentration in simulated corneal refractive surgery using a perturbed schematic eye model , 2003, Seminars in ophthalmology.

[10]  Thomas Kohnen,et al.  Wavefront-guided LASIK with the Zyoptix 3.1 system for the correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism with 1-year follow-up: clinical outcome and change in higher order aberrations. , 2004, Ophthalmology.

[11]  David Williams,et al.  Image Metrics for Predicting Subjective Image Quality , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[12]  D. Andrich.  A rating formulation for ordered response categories , 1978 .

[13]  Konrad Pesudovs,et al.  The Development, Assessment, and Selection of Questionnaires , 2007, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[14]  E. Sabadini,et al.  Vortex breakdown produced in a cylindrical rotating end wall , 2001 .

[15]  T. Kohnen,et al.  Wellenfrontaberrationen und subjektive optische Qualität nach wellenfrontgeführter LASIK , 2007, Der Ophthalmologe.

[16]  A. Bradley,et al.  Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[17]  P Artal,et al.  Average optical performance of the human eye as a function of age in a normal population. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  A. Bradley,et al.  Predicting subjective judgment of best focus with objective image quality metrics. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[19]  Nick Mamalis,et al.  Quality of vision. , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[20]  Thomas Kohnen,et al.  Comparison of a digital and a handheld infrared pupillometer for determining scotopic pupil diameter , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[21]  Konrad Pesudovs,et al.  The Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) Questionnaire: Development and Validation , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[22]  T Kohnen,et al.  [Wavefront aberrations and subjective quality of vision after wavefront-guided LASIK: first results]. , 2007, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[23]  Larry N Thibos,et al.  Measuring visual acuity--mesopic or photopic conditions, and high or low contrast letters? , 2004, Journal of refractive surgery.

[24]  L. Thibos,et al.  Standards for reporting the optical aberrations of eyes. , 2002, Journal of refractive surgery.

[25]  Raymond A Applegate,et al.  Making sense out of wavefront sensing. , 2005, American journal of ophthalmology.

[26]  J T Lin.  A prospective randomized clinical trial of laser in situ keratomileusis with two different lasers. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.

[27]  T. Kohnen,et al.  Cataract and refractive surgery , 2005 .

[28]  D R Williams,et al.  Effect of rotation and translation on the expected benefit of an ideal method to correct the eye's higher-order aberrations. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[29]  Konrad Pesudovs,et al.  Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: the nexus between corneal wavefront aberrations and visual performance. , 2006, Journal of refractive surgery.

[30]  E. Sarver,et al.  Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[31]  T. Seiler,et al.  Ocular optical aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia and myopic astigmatism. , 2000, Archives of ophthalmology.

[32]  Thomas Kohnen,et al.  Quality of Vision After Refractive Surgery , 2005 .

[33]  Larry N Thibos,et al.  Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[34]  Michael Bach,et al.  Measuring Contrast Sensitivity Under Different Lighting Conditions: Comparison of Three Tests , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[35]  Sanjay V. Patel,et al.  Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[36]  Thomas Kohnen,et al.  In vivo and in vitro repeatability of Hartmann‐Shack aberrometry , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[37]  Junzhong Liang,et al.  Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a Hartmann-Shack wave-front sensor. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[38]  David Mas,et al.  Optical analysis of presbyLASIK treatment by a light propagation algorithm. , 2007, Journal of refractive surgery.

[39]  T Kohnen,et al.  [Cyclorotation of the eye in wavefront-guided LASIK using a static eyetracker with iris recognition]. , 2007, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[40]  David B. Elliott,et al.  The Refractive Status and Vision Profile: Evaluation of psychometric properties and comparison of Rasch and summated Likert-scaling , 2006, Vision Research.

[41]  Kuang-mon Ashley Tuan.  Visual experience and patient satisfaction with wavefront‐guided laser in situ keratomileusis , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[42]  Karla Zadnik,et al.  Patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after laser in situ keratomileusis. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[43]  J M Linacre,et al.  Rasch analysis of Visual Analog Scale measurements before and after treatment of Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome in women. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[44]  T Kohnen,et al.  Measuring vision in refractive surgery. , 2001, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[45]  Gregory J. McCormick,et al.  Higher-order aberrations in eyes with irregular corneas after laser refractive surgery. , 2004, Ophthalmology.

[46]  Xu Cheng,et al.  Estimating visual quality from wavefront aberration measurements. , 2003, Journal of refractive surgery.