Mapping a Values Typology in Three Counties of the Interior Northwest, USA: Scale, Geographic Associations Among Values, and the Use of Intensity Weights

Spatial attribution mapping is one method of eliciting the relationship between people and place. I use a landscape values typology and environmental values theory to investigate how people attribute values to the landscape in three counties of Idaho and Oregon. Using geographically referenced values data collected in a mail survey (n = 767), I examine the use of intensity weights when implementing a mapping exercise and the spatial scale and geographic associations between values in the typology. The results demonstrate that places within a landscape can offer multiple values, and that when geographically operationalized the landscape values typology can be divided primarily into two categories: material (socioeconomic quality) and postmaterial (personal/environmental quality) values. The findings reflect the linkages between spatially operationalized values and established environmental values theory, and the need for land use planners, natural resource managers, and local decision makers to facilitate both material and postmaterial values in their decisions.

[1]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Global environmentalism: a challenge to the postmaterialism thesis? , 1994 .

[2]  J. Beverly,et al.  Assessing spatial attributes of forest landscape values: an internet-based participatory mapping approach. , 2008 .

[3]  Daniel R. Williams,et al.  Demographic Influences on Environmental Value Orientations and Normative Beliefs About National Forest Management , 2001 .

[4]  Antony S. Cheng,et al.  Examining the Interaction Between Geographic Scale and Ways of Knowing in Ecosystem Management: A Case Study of Place-Based Collaborative Planning , 2003, Forest Science.

[5]  Margaret Wickens Pearce,et al.  Boundaries of Home: Mapping for Local Empowerment , 1995 .

[6]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[7]  Gregory Brown Mapping Spatial Attributes in Survey Research for Natural Resource Management: Methods and Applications , 2004 .

[8]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Toward A Universal Psychological Structure of Human Values , 1987 .

[9]  P. Chisnall Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[10]  D. Dillman Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[11]  R. Inglehart Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society , 1991 .

[12]  John A. Glaser,et al.  Environmental values , 2008 .

[13]  W. Freimund,et al.  The Politics of Place: Understanding Meaning, Common Ground, and Political Difference on the Rocky Mountain Front , 2003, Forest Science.

[14]  William P. Anderson,et al.  Using Spatial Statistics to Examine the Pattern of Urban Land Development in Halifax–Dartmouth , 2002 .

[15]  David N. Bengston,et al.  Trends in National Forest Values among Forestry Professionals, Environmentalists, and the News Media, 1982-1993 , 1997 .

[16]  Samuel M. Otterstrom,et al.  Spatial Patterns of Migration and Income Change in the Mountain West: The Dominance of Service-Based, Amenity-Rich Counties , 2001 .

[17]  M. Rokeach The Nature Of Human Values , 1974 .

[18]  Doug Aberley,et al.  Boundaries of home : mapping for local empowerment , 1993 .

[19]  J. Hartigan,et al.  The Dip Test of Unimodality , 1985 .

[20]  Patrick J. Sullivan,et al.  Housing density as an indicator of spatial patterns of reported human-wildlife interactions in Northern New York , 2008 .

[21]  Margaret A. Nemeth,et al.  Applied Multivariate Methods for Data Analysis , 1998, Technometrics.

[22]  P. Stern,et al.  The Value Basis of Environmental Concern , 1994 .

[23]  Greg Brown,et al.  Testing a place-based theory for environmental evaluation: an Alaska case study , 2002 .

[24]  Max Nielsen-Pincus,et al.  Predicting land use change: comparison of models based on landowner surveys and historical land cover trends , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[25]  Gregory Brown,et al.  Validation of a Forest Values Typology for Use in National Forest Planning , 2000, Forestry sciences.