Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification.

PURPOSE To revise the staging system for cutaneous melanoma on the basis of data from an expanded American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Melanoma Staging Database. METHODS The melanoma staging recommendations were made on the basis of a multivariate analysis of 30,946 patients with stages I, II, and III melanoma and 7,972 patients with stage IV melanoma to revise and clarify TNM classifications and stage grouping criteria. RESULTS Findings and new definitions include the following: (1) in patients with localized melanoma, tumor thickness, mitotic rate (histologically defined as mitoses/mm(2)), and ulceration were the most dominant prognostic factors. (2) Mitotic rate replaces level of invasion as a primary criterion for defining T1b melanomas. (3) Among the 3,307 patients with regional metastases, components that defined the N category were the number of metastatic nodes, tumor burden, and ulceration of the primary melanoma. (4) For staging purposes, all patients with microscopic nodal metastases, regardless of extent of tumor burden, are classified as stage III. Micrometastases detected by immunohistochemistry are specifically included. (5) On the basis of a multivariate analysis of patients with distant metastases, the two dominant components in defining the M category continue to be the site of distant metastases (nonvisceral v lung v all other visceral metastatic sites) and an elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase level. CONCLUSION Using an evidence-based approach, revisions to the AJCC melanoma staging system have been made that reflect our improved understanding of this disease. These revisions will be formally incorporated into the seventh edition (2009) of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and implemented by early 2010.

[1]  D. Elder,et al.  Identification of high-risk patients among those diagnosed with thin cutaneous melanomas. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  N. Cascinelli,et al.  Sentinel and nonsentinel node status in stage IB and II melanoma patients: two-step prognostic indicators of survival. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  K. Busam The Prognostic Importance of Tumor Mitotic Rate for Patients with Primary Cutaneous Melanoma , 2004, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[4]  M. Ross,et al.  Critical analysis of the current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma and proposal of a new staging system. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  A. Halpern,et al.  A Single-Institution Validation of the AJCC Staging System for Stage IV Melanoma , 2007, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[6]  A. Cochran,et al.  Immunohistochemical characteristics of melanoma , 2008, Journal of cutaneous pathology.

[7]  M. Ross,et al.  Multi-institutional melanoma lymphatic mapping experience: the prognostic value of sentinel lymph node status in 612 stage I or II melanoma patients. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  F. F. Charles M. Balch MD Microscopic Satellites Around a Primary Melanoma: Another Piece of the Puzzle in Melanoma Staging , 2009, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[9]  D. Coit,et al.  Multivariate prognostic model for patients with thick cutaneous melanoma: Importance of sentinel lymph node status , 2002, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[10]  E. Gershenwald Improved staging of node-negative patients with intermediate to thick melanomas (>1 mm) with the use of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy , 2007, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[11]  C. Balch,et al.  A multifactorial analysis of melanoma. II. Prognostic factors in patients with stage I (localized) melanoma. , 1979, Surgery.

[12]  M. Nosrati,et al.  The role of microsatellites as a prognostic factor in primary malignant melanoma. , 2005, Archives of dermatology.

[13]  M. Ross,et al.  Improved Staging of Node-Negative Patients With Intermediate to Thick Melanomas (>1 mm) With the Use of Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , 2001, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[14]  D. Morton,et al.  Prognostic factors in 1,521 melanoma patients with distant metastases. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[15]  N Cascinelli,et al.  Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  A. Testori,et al.  Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Cutaneous Melanoma: The WHO Melanoma Program Experience , 2000, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[17]  C. Balch,et al.  Method of Biopsy and Incidence of Positive Margins in Primary Melanoma , 2007, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[18]  D. Morton,et al.  Improved survival after lymphadenectomy for nodal metastasis from an unknown primary melanoma. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  J. D. Rosso Microscopic Satellitosis in Patients with Primary Cutaneous Melanoma: Implications for Nodal Basin Staging , 2010 .

[20]  Jeffrey E. Lee,et al.  Role for Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients With Thick (≥4 mm) Primary Melanoma , 2000, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[21]  Jeffrey E. Lee,et al.  Metastatic melanoma to lymph nodes in patients with unknown primary sites , 2006, Cancer.

[22]  J. Kirkwood,et al.  Implications of microscopic satellites of the primary and extracapsular lymph node spread in patients with high-risk melanoma: pathologic corollary of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial E1690. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  J. Lang Mitotic Rate as a Predictor of Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity in Patients With Thin Melanomas , 2006 .

[24]  J. Manola,et al.  Prognostic factors in metastatic melanoma: a pooled analysis of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trials. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  V. Sondak,et al.  Sentinel node biopsy and standard of care for melanoma. , 2009, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[26]  D. Elder Pathology of Melanoma , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[27]  A. Alavi,et al.  Mitotic Rate as a Predictor of Sentinel Lymph NodePositivity in Patients With Thin Melanomas , 2004, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[28]  C. Balch,et al.  A multifactorial analysis of melanoma. IV. Prognostic factors in 200 melanoma patients with distant metastases (stage III). , 1983, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  Martin F. Mihm,et al.  Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  M. Gonen,et al.  Characterization of Micrometastatic Disease in Melanoma Sentinel Lymph Nodes by Enhanced Pathology: Recommendations for Standardizing Pathologic Analysis , 2005, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[31]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Prognostic factors for survival and factors associated with long-term remission in patients with advanced melanoma receiving cytokine-based treatments: second analysis of a randomised EORTC Melanoma Group trial comparing interferon-alpha2a (IFNalpha) and interleukin 2 (IL-2) with or without cisplati , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[32]  Jeffrey E. Lee,et al.  Revised American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Criteria Accurately Predict Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity in Clinically Node-Negative Melanoma Patients , 2003, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[33]  R. Lyles,et al.  Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Thick (≥4-mm) Melanoma: Should We Be Doing It? , 2003, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[34]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Prognostic factors for survival and factors associated with long-term remission in patients with advanced melanoma receiving cytokine-based treatments: Second analysis of a randomised EORTC Melanoma Group trial comparing interferon-α2a (IFNα) and interleukin 2 (IL-2) with or without cisplatin , 2002 .

[35]  R. Scolyer,et al.  The Prognostic Importance of Tumor Mitotic Rate Confirmed in 1317 Patients With Primary Cutaneous Melanoma and Long Follow-Up , 2004, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[36]  C. Balch,et al.  Sentinel-node biopsy in melanoma. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  P. Hwu,et al.  Prognostic Factors That Determine the Long-Term Survival of Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Melanoma , 2008, Cancer investigation.