A routability-driven flow routing algorithm for programmable microfluidic devices

Biochips that are made of Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) are concerned by everyone in recent years. The advantages of biochips are high accuracy and fast reaction rate with only a small volume consumption of samples and reagents. Among various types of biochips, flow-based microfluidic biochips receive much attention recently, especially the programmable microfluidic device (PMD). PMDs are capable of performing multitude functions in one platform without requiring any hardware modifications. As the size of chips increase, flow routing becomes more complicated. Traditional method to manually control multiple flows is inefficient and it may not have feasible assay completion time. Fortunately, PMDs has high potential to route flows with pure software programs to overcome the drawbacks of traditional methods. However, naive software program that simply minimizing assay completion time may cause flow-congestion problems and unexpected mixing between different assays, i,e., fluidic constraint. To conduct a viable experiment, a feasible program should not only minimize assay completion time but also consider congestion problems and fluidic constraint. Therefore, we formulate the flow routing problem and propose a routability-driven flow routing algorithm which considers the fluidic constraint and minimizes the assay completion time on PMDs.

[1]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Soft Lithography. , 1998, Angewandte Chemie.

[2]  S. Quake,et al.  Monolithic microfabricated valves and pumps by multilayer soft lithography. , 2000, Science.

[3]  Ian Papautsky,et al.  Programmable Electrowetting with Channels and Droplets , 2015, Micromachines.

[4]  William H. Grover,et al.  Development and multiplexed control of latching pneumatic valves using microfluidic logical structures. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[5]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Soft lithography in biology and biochemistry. , 2001, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[6]  Erik C Jensen,et al.  A digital microfluidic platform for the automation of quantitative biomolecular assays. , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[7]  S. Quake,et al.  A Systems Approach to Measuring the Binding Energy Landscapes of Transcription Factors , 2007, Science.

[8]  S. Quake,et al.  Microfluidic Large-Scale Integration , 2002, Science.

[9]  Jessica Melin,et al.  Microfluidic large-scale integration: the evolution of design rules for biological automation. , 2007, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[10]  Sebastian J Maerkl,et al.  A software-programmable microfluidic device for automated biology. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[11]  Charles M. Fiduccia,et al.  A linear-time heuristic for improving network partitions , 1988, 25 years of DAC.

[12]  Stephen R Quake,et al.  Experimental determination of the evolvability of a transcription factor , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Fan-Gang Tseng,et al.  Microfluidic Systems for Biosensing , 2010, Sensors.

[14]  Kai Hu,et al.  Testing of flow-based microfluidic biochips , 2013, 2013 IEEE 31st VLSI Test Symposium (VTS).