Electrophysiological correlates of second language processing

The aim of this article is to provide a selective review of event-related potential (ERP) research on second language processing. As ERPs have been used in the investigation of a variety of linguistic domains, the reported studies cover different paradigms assessing processing mechanisms in the second language at various levels, ranging from phoneme discrimination to complex sentence processing. Differences between ERP patterns of first language (L1) and second language (L2) speakers can help to specify and to test predictions derived from models of L2 processing or hypotheses concerning critical periods for some aspects of second language acquisition. The studies currently available suggest that ERPs are indeed sensitive to qualitative and quantitative differences in L2 speakers with regard to on-line processing.

[1]  Judith F. Kroll,et al.  Accessing Conceptual Representations for Words in a Second Language , 1993 .

[2]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Linguistic relevance of duration within the native language determines the accuracy of speech-sound duration processing. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[3]  Sonja A. Kotz,et al.  Neurolinguistic evidence for bilingual language representation: a comparison of reaction times and event-related brain potentials , 2001 .

[4]  Morris Halle,et al.  The rules of language , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[5]  D. Swinney,et al.  Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  H. Neville,et al.  Maturational Constraints on Functional Specializations for Language Processing: ERP and Behavioral Evidence in Bilingual Speakers , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  M. Huotilainen,et al.  Event-related potentials associated with second language learning in children , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[9]  Paavo Alku,et al.  Mismatch negativity shows that 3–6-year-old children can learn to discriminate non-native speech sounds within two months , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[10]  Kerrie E. Elston-Güttler,et al.  The role of proficiency on processing categorical and associative information in the L2 as revealed by reaction times and event-related brain potentials , 2004, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[11]  A. Friederici,et al.  Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. , 1993, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[12]  G. Yeni-Komshian,et al.  Age Constraints on Second-Language Acquisition , 1999 .

[13]  R. Näätänen.  The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm). , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[14]  Lisa D. Sanders,et al.  An ERP study of continuous speech processing. II. Segmentation, semantics, and syntax in non-native speakers. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[15]  A Hahne,et al.  What's Different in Second-Language Processing? Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[16]  A. Friederici.  Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  M. Penke,et al.  Brain potentials indicate differences between regular and irregular German plurals , 1997, Neuroreport.

[18]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[19]  H. Neville,et al.  Language and , 2019, Adventure Diffusion.

[20]  A. Friederici,et al.  Processing a second language: Late learners''comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related b , 2001 .

[21]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses , 1997, Nature.

[22]  E. Donchin.  Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!...Surprise? , 1981, Psychophysiology.

[23]  A. Hahne,et al.  Second language learners' processing of inflected words: Behavioral and ERP evidence for storage and decomposition , 2003 .

[24]  A. Friederici,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Two Steps in Syntactic Analysis: Early Automatic and Late Controlled Processes , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  M. Kutas,et al.  An Event-Related Potential (ERP) Analysis of Semantic Congruity and Repetition Effects in Sentences , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Brain responses reveal the learning of foreign language phonemes. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[27]  M Rugg,et al.  Functional neuroimaging in cognitive neurosicence , 1999 .

[28]  M. Rugg,et al.  Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition , 1995 .

[29]  David Birdsong.  Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition , 1992 .

[30]  M. Kutas,et al.  Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  Elissa L. Newport,et al.  Segmenting nonsense: an event-related potential index of perceived onsets in continuous speech , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  Renata Meuter,et al.  Brain responses to semantic incongruity in bilinguals , 1990, Brain and Language.

[33]  M. Garrett,et al.  Syntactically Based Sentence Processing Classes: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[35]  Michael T. Ullman,et al.  The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: the declarative/procedural model , 2001 .

[36]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Development of language-specific phoneme representations in the infant brain , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  Laura Sabourin.  Grammatical Gender and Second Language Processing , 2003 .

[38]  H. Neville,et al.  Sensitive periods differentiate processing of open- and closed-class words: an ERP study of bilinguals. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[39]  Lisa D. Sanders,et al.  An ERP study of continuous speech processing. I. Segmentation, semantics, and syntax in native speakers. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[40]  T. Dijkstra,et al.  Language context effects on interlingual homograph recognition: Evidence from event-related potentials and response times in semantic priming , 2001 .

[41]  E. Gibson,et al.  The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty , 2000 .

[42]  J. Kroll,et al.  Category Interference in Translation and Picture Naming: Evidence for Asymmetric Connections Between Bilingual Memory Representations , 1994 .

[43]  Karsten Steinhauer,et al.  Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  M. Kutas,et al.  Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations , 1998 .

[45]  J. S. Johnson,et al.  Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[46]  Cheryl Frenck-Mestre,et al.  Second Language Autonomy , 1997 .

[47]  H. Neville,et al.  Fractionating language: different neural subsystems with different sensitive periods. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[48]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[49]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[50]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.