Energy Balanced In-Network Aggregation Using Multiple Trees in Wireless Sensor Networks

Advances in wireless networks are expected to play an increasing role in systems that are aimed at collecting information. One of the main challenges in wireless sensor networks is that a sensor node has limited battery power. Therefore in order to increase the lifetime of sensor nodes, we need to reduce the amount of energy consumption. For reducing energy consumption in sensor networks, in-network aggregation is one of the proposed methods. However in-network aggregation does not keep the energy balance if some nodes are on the most frequently used paths in a network such as sink node. In order to consider more energy efficiency through load balancing, we propose a new in-network aggregation structure based on multiple trees, called MULT, for further extending the lifetime of in-network aggregation. Unlike existing in-network aggregation structures, which aim to reduce communication cost, the proposed MULT further provides energy balance. MULT has 3phases: first building the clusters, second connecting the clusters and third making multiple trees. MULT is based on creating node clusters using distance between nodes. In addition, a new clustering method, called HYC (HYbrid Cluster) is introduced for MULT structure. We compare the MULT with LEACH and EAD, which are popular in-network aggregation methods. MULT outperforms LEACH and EAD for energy load balance. KeywordsSensor Network, Energy Load Balance, In-Network aggregation

[1]  William A. Sethares,et al.  Automatic Decentralized Clustering for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2005, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[2]  A. Manjeshwar,et al.  TEEN: a routing protocol for enhanced efficiency in wireless sensor networks , 2001, Proceedings 15th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium. IPDPS 2001.

[3]  Wei Hong,et al.  Model-Driven Data Acquisition in Sensor Networks , 2004, VLDB.

[4]  Wei Hong,et al.  Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation Tag: a Tiny Aggregation Service for Ad-hoc Sensor Networks , 2022 .

[5]  JAMAL N. AL-KARAKI,et al.  Routing techniques in wireless sensor networks: a survey , 2004, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[6]  Wendi Heinzelman,et al.  Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[7]  Mohamed A. Sharaf,et al.  Balancing energy efficiency and quality of aggregate data in sensor networks , 2004, The VLDB Journal.

[8]  Azzedine Boukerche,et al.  Energy-aware data-centric routing in microsensor networks , 2003, MSWIM '03.

[9]  Daniela Rus,et al.  Hierarchical Power-aware Routing in Sensor Networks , 2001 .

[10]  Mohamed F. Younis,et al.  Energy-aware routing in cluster-based sensor networks , 2002, Proceedings. 10th IEEE International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunications Systems.

[11]  Matt Welsh,et al.  Simulating the power consumption of large-scale sensor network applications , 2004, SenSys '04.

[12]  Yong Yao,et al.  The cougar approach to in-network query processing in sensor networks , 2002, SGMD.

[13]  Ossama Younis,et al.  Distributed clustering in ad-hoc sensor networks: a hybrid, energy-efficient approach , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[14]  Suman Nath,et al.  Tributaries and deltas: efficient and robust aggregation in sensor network streams , 2005, SIGMOD '05.