Computer-Enhanced and Mobile-Assisted Language Learning: Emerging Issues and Trends

As the field of Information and Communication Technologies rapidly expands, the applications to language learning continue to grow. Computer-Enhanced and Mobile-Assisted Language Learning: Emerging Issues and Trends compiles the latest research into computer-enhanced language learning, as well as the integration of mobile devices into new language acquisition. Though new information is constantly coming out as technologies continue to evolve, this important new follow-up publication will be distributed worldwide among academic and professional institutions and will be instrumental in providing researchers, scholars, students, and professionals access to the latest knowledge related to research on computer-enhanced and mobile assisted language learning.

[1]  R. Ellis.  MEASURING IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE OF A SECOND LANGUAGE: A Psychometric Study , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[2]  Jan H. Hulstijn,et al.  Towards a unified account of the representation, processing and acquisition of second language knowledge , 2002 .

[3]  F. Hardman,et al.  Time for refilling the bath?: A study of primary student‐teachers’ grammatical knowledge , 1995 .

[4]  Nina Garrett,et al.  Where do research and practice meet? Developing a discipline , 1998 .

[5]  Lydia White.  Adverb placement in second language acquisition: some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom , 1991 .

[6]  R. Ellis.  Grammatically Judgments and Second Language Acquisition , 1991, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[7]  R. Ellis,et al.  Metalanguage in Focus on Form in the Communicative Classroom , 2002 .

[8]  C. Chapelle,et al.  Individual Learner Differences in CALL: The Field Independence/Dependence (FID) Construct , 2013 .

[9]  W. Rutherford,et al.  Consciousness-raising and Universal Grammar , 1985 .

[10]  John Truscott,et al.  Stages or Continua in Second Language Acquisition: A MOGUL Solution , 2005 .

[11]  Simon Borg,et al.  Integrating Grammar in Adult TESOL Classrooms , 2008 .

[12]  R. Ellis.  The Definition and Measurement of L2 Explicit Knowledge , 2004 .

[13]  S. Borg.  Teacher Cognition in Grammar Teaching: A Literature Review , 2003 .

[14]  R. Dekeyser.  Implicit and Explicit Learning , 2008 .

[15]  C. Clapham,et al.  Metalinguistic knowledge, language aptitude and language proficiency , 1997 .

[16]  Eckhard Bick.  The VISL System: Research and applicative aspects of IT-based learning , 2001, NODALIDA.

[17]  Atro Voutilainen,et al.  A language-independent system for parsing unrestricted text , 1995 .

[18]  J. Vinther.  Cognitive processes at work in CALL , 2005 .

[19]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Computational Models of Implicit Learning , 2019, Implicit Learning.

[20]  Stephen Andrews,et al.  'All These Like Little Name Things': A Comparative Study of Language Teachers' Explicit Knowledge of Grammar and Grammatical Terminology , 1999 .

[21]  Carol A. Chapelle,et al.  CALL in the Year 2000: Still in Search of Research Paradigms? , 1997 .

[22]  M. Salaberry.  The Use of Technology for Second Language Learning and Teaching: A Retrospective , 2001 .

[23]  M. Smith.  Consciousness-Raising and the Second Language Learner1 , 1981 .

[24]  Rod Ellis,et al.  The Structural Syllabus and Second Language Acquisition , 1993 .

[25]  S. Gass,et al.  Differential Effects of Attention , 2003 .

[26]  Noriko Nagata,et al.  Computer vs. Workbook Instruction in Second Language Acquisition , 2013, CALICO Journal.

[27]  Susan Bull,et al.  Encouraging advanced second language speakers to recognise their language difficulties: a personalised computer-based approach , 2010 .

[28]  Karen Roehr,et al.  Metalinguistic Knowledge and Language Ability in University-Level L2 Learners , 2008 .

[29]  Trude Heift,et al.  Corrective feedback and learner uptake in CALL , 2004, ReCALL.

[30]  Leila Ranta,et al.  Examining the Interface between Metalinguistic Task Performance and Oral Production in a Second Language , 2002 .

[31]  Eckhard Bick.  Grammar for Fun:: IT-based Grammar Learning with VISL , 2005 .

[32]  Mathias Schulze,et al.  From the developer to the learner: describing grammar – learning grammar , 1999, ReCALL.

[33]  Ellen Bialystok,et al.  A Theoretical Model of Second Language Learning , 1978 .

[34]  Karen Roehr,et al.  The status of metalinguistic knowledge in instructed adult L2 learning , 2009 .

[35]  M. Smith.  In Two Minds about Grammar: on the Interaction of Linguistic and Metalinguistic Knowledge in Performance , 2004 .

[36]  Marina K. Burt,et al.  SHOULD WE TEACH CHILDREN SYNTAX , 1973 .

[37]  Claus Færch.  Meta Talk in FL Classroom Discourse , 1985, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[38]  Simon Borg,et al.  The use of grammatical terminology in the second language classroom: a quality study of teachers' practices and cognitions , 1999 .

[39]  R. Schmidt.  The role of consciousness in second language learning , 1990 .

[40]  Roger Berry,et al.  Making the Most of Metalanguage , 2005 .

[41]  Mike Levy,et al.  Teacher education in CALL , 2006 .

[42]  Thomas Bloor.  What Do Language Students Know About Grammar , 1986 .

[43]  J. Hulstijn,et al.  Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal , 1994 .

[44]  Jane Vinther.  Can Parsers be a Legitimate Pedagogical Tool? , 2004 .

[45]  H. Kleinmann.  The Effect of Computer-Assisted Instruction on ESL Reading Achievement , 1987 .

[46]  Nicole McBride,et al.  Bridging the gap: grammar as hypertext , 1997 .