Automated Operating Procedures for Transfer Limits

A Modern Energy Management System (EMS) provides sophisticated online security analysis applications to assist operators in ensuring that the power system can survive credible contingencies. Still in current practice, system operators generally refer to written operating procedures to establish system constraints, particularly in regards to transfer limits across major interties. The limits are based on numerous power system studies that represent the stressed system and satisfy specific performance criteria following select contingencies. The relations between these critical paths and operating conditions are tabulated and often plotted as nomograms. With such a simplified view of system conditions, the operator is unable to have a complete understanding of operational limits. Thus, transfer ratings are typically conservative, as studies are based on highly stressed system conditions, and incomplete, as studies cannot analyze all combinations of equipment out-of-service. This study investigates some approaches to improving such operator procedures. Ensuring system security usually means operating so as to maintain a specified margin, for example, real power reserve within a particular area. The required margins are generally mandated by the regional reliability organizations. Unfortunately, it is time-consuming to compute such limits and thus, the margins are primarily determined off-line. The operators then use the conservatively tabulated values to operate the system within limits. Ideally, as the system operating conditions change, the margins would be recomputed to precisely verify security. Since this is computationally infeasible, an alternative approach is to employ pattern matching methods. That is, by using the detailed off-line studies to interpolate between unstudied operating conditions, one can estimate the margins from the present operating point without employing detailed calculations. This project looked at general ways to improve the operator procedures with particular emphasis on estimating the margin based on such pattern matching schemes. As voltage security is an increasingly important issue as systems are operating under greater stress, this study focused on voltage issues. Specific contributions from this study were: • A typical set of operating procedures was tabulated into an on-line database. Conceptually, these margins can be easily modified on-line to reflect changing system conditions. • Several pattern matching type approaches were investigated using a modified New England 39 bus system. Based on these results, a system based on feedforward artificial neural networks (ANN) was designed. • A modified ANN system, employing multiple networks and a voting system, was applied to the Western System Coordinating Council (WSCC) system. The analysis was based on …

[1]  G. Stent A physiological mechanism for Hebb's postulate of learning. , 1973, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Allen J. Wood,et al.  Power Generation, Operation, and Control , 1984 .

[3]  Venkataramana Ajjarapu,et al.  The continuation power flow: a tool for steady state voltage stability analysis , 1991 .

[4]  F. Alvarado,et al.  Point of collapse methods applied to AC/DC power systems , 1992 .

[5]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Bayesian Interpolation , 1992, Neural Computation.

[6]  B. Gao,et al.  Voltage Stability Evaluation Using Modal Analysis , 1992, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[7]  Louis Wehenkel,et al.  Decision tree approaches to voltage security assessment , 1993 .

[8]  D. Hill,et al.  Voltage stability indices for stressed power systems , 1993 .

[9]  R. Yokoyama,et al.  A coordinated control of voltage and reactive power by heuristic modeling and approximate reasoning , 1993 .

[10]  G. K. Morison,et al.  Voltage stability/security assessment and on-line control. Volume 1: Final report , 1993 .

[11]  J. W. Cote,et al.  Voltage security assessment using generalized operational planning knowledge , 1993 .

[12]  S. Hyakin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1994 .

[13]  Louis Wehenkel,et al.  Machine learning, neural networks and statistical pattern recognition for voltage security: a comparative study , 1994 .

[14]  A. A. El-Keib,et al.  Application of artificial neural networks in voltage stability assessment , 1995 .

[15]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Statistical Theory of Overtraining - Is Cross-Validation Asymptotically Effective? , 1995, NIPS.

[16]  Howard B. Demuth,et al.  Neutral network toolbox for use with Matlab , 1995 .

[17]  G. C. Ejebe,et al.  Methods for contingency screening and ranking for voltage stability analysis of power systems , 1995 .

[18]  R. Adapa,et al.  Investigation of artificial neural networks for voltage stability assessment , 1995, 1995 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Intelligent Systems for the 21st Century.

[19]  M. La Scala,et al.  A neural network-based method for voltage security monitoring , 1996 .

[20]  K. L. Lo,et al.  Fuzzy reasoning for knowledge-based assessment of dynamic voltage security , 1996 .

[21]  A. T. Johns,et al.  Power system voltage stability assessment using a self-organizing neural network classifier , 1996 .

[22]  K. H. Chiang,et al.  Conceptual designs of AI-based systems for local prediction of voltage collapse , 1996 .

[23]  Ching-Tzong Su,et al.  A new fuzzy control approach to voltage profile enhancement for power systems , 1996 .

[24]  Y.-L. Chen Weak bus oriented reactive power planning for system security , 1996 .

[25]  A.C.Z. de Souza,et al.  Comparison of performance indices for detection of proximity to voltage collapse , 1996 .

[26]  Danny Sutanto,et al.  Application of an optimisation method for determining the reactive margin from voltage collapse in reactive power planning , 1996 .

[27]  Alexander J. Flueck,et al.  Look-ahead voltage and load margin contingency selection functions for large-scale power systems , 1997 .

[28]  Sushil Chauhan,et al.  Kohonen neural network classifier for voltage collapse margin estimation , 1997 .

[29]  Fernando L. Alvarado,et al.  Sensitivity of the loading margin to voltage collapse with respect to arbitrary parameters , 1997 .

[30]  Dragan Kukolj,et al.  Monitoring and assessment of voltage stability margins using artificial neural networks with a reduced input set , 1998 .

[31]  Alberto Berizzi,et al.  First and second order methods for voltage collapse assessment and security enhancement , 1998 .

[32]  Chen-Sung Chang,et al.  Neuro-fuzzy networks for voltage security monitoring based on synchronized phasor measurements , 1998 .

[33]  G. Levitin,et al.  Genetic algorithm for optimal planning of transmission system reactive power compensation under security constraints , 1998, MELECON '98. 9th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36056).

[34]  Y.-Y. Hong,et al.  Expert system for enhancing voltage security/stability in power systems , 1999 .

[35]  G. Ramakrishna,et al.  Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for volt/var control in distribution systems , 1999 .

[36]  Ching-Tzong Su,et al.  Voltage/reactive Power Control via Fuzzy Linear Programming Approach , 1999, Cybern. Syst..

[37]  Fernando L. Alvarado,et al.  Contingency ranking for voltage collapse via sensitivities from a single nose curve , 1999 .

[38]  J Nahman,et al.  Fuzzy logic and probability based real time contingency ranking , 2000 .

[39]  Kevin Tomsovic,et al.  Estimating reactive margin for determining transfer limits , 2000, 2000 Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting (Cat. No.00CH37134).