The interpolation of rotations and its application to finite element models of geometrically exact rods

The finite element formulation of geometrically exact rod models depends crucially on the interpolation of the rotation field from the nodes to the integration points where the internal forces and tangent stiffness are evaluated. Since the rotational group is a nonlinear space, standard (isoparametric) interpolation of these degrees of freedom does not guarantee the orthogonality of the interpolated field hence, more sophisticated interpolation strategies have to be devised. We review and classify the rotation interpolation techniques most commonly used in the context of nonlinear rod models and suggest new ones. All of them are compared and their advantages and disadvantages discussed. In particular, their effect on the frame invariance of the resulting discrete models is analyzed.

[1]  W. Smoleński.  Statically and kinematically exact nonlinear theory of rods and its numerical verification , 1999 .

[2]  Ignacio Romero,et al.  An objective finite element approximation of the kinematics of geometrically exact rods and its use in the formulation of an energy–momentum conserving scheme in dynamics , 2002 .

[3]  R. A. Spurrier.  Comment on " Singularity-Free Extraction of a Quaternion from a Direction-Cosine Matrix" , 1978 .

[4]  J. Kuipers.  Quaternions and Rotation Sequences , 1998 .

[5]  A. Palazotto,et al.  Large-deformation analysis of flexible beams , 1996 .

[6]  J. Argyris.  An excursion into large rotations , 1982 .

[7]  J. C. Simo,et al.  A three-dimensional finite-strain rod model. Part II: Computational aspects , 1986 .

[8]  J. C. Simo,et al.  A Geometrically-exact rod model incorporating shear and torsion-warping deformation , 1991 .

[9]  J. C. Simo,et al.  On the dynamics of finite-strain rods undergoing large motions a geometrically exact approach , 1988 .

[10]  J. C. Simo,et al.  On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part VI: Conserving algorithms for non‐linear dynamics , 1992 .

[11]  K. Bathe,et al.  Large displacement analysis of three‐dimensional beam structures , 1979 .

[12]  E. Reissner.  On one-dimensional finite-strain beam theory: The plane problem , 1972 .

[13]  O. Bauchau,et al.  Numerical integration of non‐linear elastic multi‐body systems , 1995 .

[14]  Gordan Jelenić,et al.  Geometrically exact 3D beam theory: implementation of a strain-invariant finite element for statics and dynamics , 1999 .

[15]  J. W. Humberston.  Classical mechanics , 1980, Nature.

[16]  M. Géradin,et al.  A beam finite element non‐linear theory with finite rotations , 1988 .

[17]  Carlo L. Bottasso,et al.  Integrating Finite Rotations , 1998 .

[18]  M. Crisfield,et al.  Objectivity of strain measures in the geometrically exact three-dimensional beam theory and its finite-element implementation , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[19]  E. Stein,et al.  On the parametrization of finite rotations in computational mechanics: A classification of concepts with application to smooth shells , 1998 .

[20]  Goto Yoshiaki,et al.  Elastic buckling phenomenon applicable to deployable rings , 1992 .

[21]  Werner Wagner,et al.  THEORY AND NUMERICS OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL BEAMS WITH ELASTOPLASTIC MATERIAL BEHAVIOUR ∗ , 2000 .

[22]  Gordan Jelenić,et al.  A kinematically exact space finite strain beam model - finite element formulation by generalized virtual work principle , 1995 .

[23]  Robert L. Taylor,et al.  On the role of frame-invariance in structural mechanics models at finite rotations , 2002 .

[24]  J. C. Simo,et al.  On the Dynamics of Flexible Beams Under Large Overall Motions—The Plane Case: Part II , 1986 .

[25]  S. Antman.  Nonlinear problems of elasticity , 1994 .