In-situ calibration of accelerometers in body-worn sensors using quiescent gravity

As the cost, size and power required by sensor devices decrease, an increasing range of applications are possible. We focus on the application of tracking accelerometer data from body worn sensors over long durations in health monitoring applications. Body worn sensors must be compact for the convenience of the patient and low power to support extended operation, but these benefits can come at the cost of accuracy. To mitigate this loss of accuracy we first examine the ability of calibration to improve accuracy. Next we propose an in-situ method for calibrating the accelerometers using the quiescent acceleration due to gravity as a calibration signal. This in-situ calibration uses only the stored data from the duration the sensor is worn by the patient and does not require any extra procedures or measurements from the physical sensor devices. Compared to a manual three-axis calibration technique, the proposed calibration can be applied to data without the need for specific calibration procedures or even access to the original sensor and provides comparable or better accuracy.

[1]  Maxim A. Batalin,et al.  Gait quality evaluation method for post-stroke patients , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[2]  Samuel Berlemont,et al.  3D gesture classification with convolutional neural networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[3]  Arch W. Naylor,et al.  Linear Operator Theory in Engineering and Science , 1971 .

[4]  István Vajk,et al.  Constrained quadratic errors-in-variables fitting , 2013, The Visual Computer.

[5]  Wouter Olthuis,et al.  Procedure for in-use calibration of triaxial accelerometers , 1997 .

[6]  Rahim Tafazolli,et al.  A Fast Calibration Method for Triaxial Magnetometers , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[7]  Suzanne Lesecq,et al.  Calibration methods for inertial and magnetic sensors , 2009 .

[8]  F. Golnaraghi,et al.  A Triaxial Accelerometer Calibration Method Using a Mathematical Model , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[9]  Timo Pylvänäinen,et al.  Automatic and adaptive calibration of 3D field sensors , 2008 .

[10]  Martin Sipos,et al.  Analyses of Triaxial Accelerometer Calibration Algorithms , 2012, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[11]  Tim Dallas,et al.  Feature Selection and Activity Recognition System Using a Single Triaxial Accelerometer , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Isaac Skog,et al.  Aligning the Forces—Eliminating the Misalignments in IMU Arrays , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[13]  Philip Robinson,et al.  Inexpensive and Automatic Calibration for Acceleration Sensors , 2004, UCS.

[14]  Marko Munih,et al.  Three-Axial Accelerometer Calibration Using Kalman Filter Covariance Matrix for Online Estimation of Optimal Sensor Orientation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[15]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .