Cartilage T2 assessment at 3-T MR imaging: in vivo differentiation of normal hyaline cartilage from reparative tissue after two cartilage repair procedures--initial experience.

PURPOSE To prospectively compare cartilage T2 values after microfracture therapy (MFX) and matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) repair procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study had institutional review board approval by the ethics committee of the Medical University of Vienna; informed consent was obtained. Twenty patients who underwent MFX or MACT (10 in each group) were enrolled. For comparability, patients of each group were matched by mean age (MFX, 40.0 years +/- 15.4 [standard deviation]; MACT, 41.0 years +/- 8.9) and postoperative interval (MFX, 28.6 months +/- 5.2; MACT, 27.4 months +/- 13.1). Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was performed with a 3-T MR imager, and T2 maps were calculated from a multiecho spin-echo measurement. Global, as well as zonal, quantitative T2 values were calculated within the cartilage repair area and within cartilage sites determined to be morphologically normal articular cartilage. Additionally, with consideration of the zonal organization, global regions of interest were subdivided into deep and superficial areas. Differences between cartilage sites and groups were calculated by using a three-way analysis of variance. RESULTS Quantitative T2 assessment of normal native hyaline cartilage showed similar results for all patients and a significant trend of increasing T2 values from deep to superficial zones (P < .05). In cartilage repair areas after MFX, global mean T2 was significantly reduced (P < .05), whereas after MACT, mean T2 was not reduced (P > or = .05). For zonal variation, repair tissue after MFX showed no significant trend between different depths (P > or = .05), in contrast to repair tissue after MACT, in which a significant increase from deep to superficial zones (P < .05) could be observed. CONCLUSION Quantitative T2 mapping seems to reflect differences in repair tissues formed after two surgical cartilage repair procedures. (c) RSNA, 2008.

[1]  Jennifer S Wayne,et al.  MR imaging of normal and matrix-depleted cartilage: correlation with biomechanical function and biochemical composition. , 2003, Radiology.

[2]  A. Ba-Ssalamah,et al.  Matrix-based autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage repair: noninvasive monitoring by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[3]  H J Mankin,et al.  Articular cartilage: degeneration and osteoarthritis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation. , 1998, Instructional course lectures.

[4]  G. Bentley,et al.  A prospective, randomised comparison of autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for osteochondral defects in the knee. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[5]  S. Majumdar,et al.  T2 relaxation time of cartilage at MR imaging: comparison with severity of knee osteoarthritis. , 2004, Radiology.

[6]  G D Smith,et al.  A clinical review of cartilage repair techniques. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  C. Ohlsson,et al.  Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  J Silvennoinen,et al.  T2 relaxation reveals spatial collagen architecture in articular cartilage: A comparative quantitative MRI and polarized light microscopic study , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  E. Basad,et al.  [MRI in the follow-up of matrix-supported autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACI) and microfracture]. , 2004, Der Radiologe.

[10]  A. Gigante,et al.  Autologous implantation of chondrocytes on a solid collagen scaffold: clinical and histological outcomes after two years of follow-up , 2005, Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[11]  V. Mlynárik,et al.  Investigation of laminar appearance of articular cartilage by means of magnetic resonance microscopy. , 1996, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[12]  N. Südkamp,et al.  Is microfracture of chondral defects in the knee associated with different results in patients aged 40 years or younger? , 2006, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[13]  Herwig Imhof,et al.  Definition of pertinent parameters for the evaluation of articular cartilage repair tissue with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, European journal of radiology.

[14]  Maurilio Marcacci,et al.  Articular Cartilage Engineering with Hyalograft® C: 3-Year Clinical Results , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  K. Briggs,et al.  Microfracture to treat full-thickness chondral defects: surgical technique, rehabilitation, and outcomes. , 2002, The journal of knee surgery.

[16]  J. Dunn,et al.  In vitro MR imaging of hyaline cartilage: correlation with scanning electron microscopy. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  George Tomlinson,et al.  Cartilage T2 assessment: differentiation of normal hyaline cartilage and reparative tissue after arthroscopic cartilage repair in equine subjects. , 2006, Radiology.

[18]  Maurilio Marcacci,et al.  Patellofemoral Full-Thickness Chondral Defects Treated with Hyalograft-C , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[19]  Jörg Haller,et al.  Magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) for the evaluation of autologous chondrocyte transplantation: determination of interobserver variability and correlation to clinical outcome after 2 years. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[20]  J. Lysholm,et al.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. , 1985, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  G. Guillot,et al.  Evaluation of cartilage repair tissue after biomaterial implantation in rat patella by using T2 mapping , 2004, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[22]  T. Aigner,et al.  Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation and Osteochondral Cylinder Transplantation in Cartilage Repair of the Knee Joint: A Prospective, Comparative Trial , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  N. Südkamp,et al.  Results after microfracture of full-thickness chondral defects in different compartments in the knee. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[24]  Stefan Marlovits,et al.  Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Postoperative Care and Rehabilitation , 2006, The American journal of sports medicine.

[25]  Van,et al.  Spatial variation of T2 in human articular cartilage. , 1997, Radiology.

[26]  L. White,et al.  MR imaging of cartilage repair procedures , 2003, Skeletal Radiology.

[27]  Edward C. Jones,et al.  The microfracture technique for the treatment of articular cartilage lesions in the knee. A prospective cohort study. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  Richard J Hawkins,et al.  Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm knee scale for various chondral disorders of the knee. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[29]  J A Skinner,et al.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation versus matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects of the knee: a prospective, randomised study. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[30]  D. Burstein,et al.  Is MRI fulfilling its promise for molecular imaging of cartilage in arthritis? , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[31]  Christian Glaser,et al.  New techniques for cartilage imaging: T2 relaxation time and diffusion-weighted MR imaging. , 2005, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[32]  E. Stankevičius,et al.  A prospective randomized clinical study of mosaic osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of osteochondral defects in the knee joint in young athletes. , 2005, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[33]  G. Lisignoli,et al.  Evidence for redifferentiation of human chondrocytes grown on a hyaluronan-based biomaterial (HYAff 11): molecular, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural analysis. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[34]  Vilmos Vécsei,et al.  Cartilage repair: generations of autologous chondrocyte transplantation. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[35]  J. Lysholm,et al.  Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale , 1982, The American journal of sports medicine.

[36]  Wilhelm Horger,et al.  Quantitative T2 Mapping of Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation at 3 Tesla: An In Vivo Cross-Sectional Study , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[37]  E. Stankevičius,et al.  Osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of articular cartilage defects in the knee joint in athletes , 2006, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[38]  Lars Engebretsen,et al.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture in the knee. A randomized trial. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[39]  R. Boutin,et al.  Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Articular Cartilage Repair , 2001, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology.

[40]  J. Dunn,et al.  Micro-imaging of articular cartilage: T2, proton density, and the magic angle effect. , 1998, Academic radiology.

[41]  S. Marlovits,et al.  MR imaging of osteochondral grafts and autologous chondrocyte implantation , 2006, European Radiology.

[42]  V J Schmithorst,et al.  MR imaging and T2 mapping of femoral cartilage: in vivo determination of the magic angle effect. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.