Dynamic MR imaging of the breast: Analysis of kinetic and morphologic diagnostic criteria

Purpose: To assess the value of kinetic and architectural diagnostic criteria on dynamic MR breast imaging, and to construct a scoring system for lesion characterization. Material and Methods: A total of 92 women with 109 histopathologically verified breast lesions were included in this retrospective study. The patients were examined by a 1.5 T system using a dedicated double breast coil. A dynamic examination with one precontrast and seven postcontrast series was performed, using a T1-weighted 3D FLASH sequence. Thirty lesions (15 malignant and 15 benign) were randomly chosen for the validation set, and the remaining 79 lesions (62 malignant and 17 benign) formed the estimation set, in which multivariate analysis was performed in order to select the most important features. These parameters were then used for constructing the scoring system, which was tested on the validation set. The scoring system was compared with the routine standard evaluation that used all established diagnostic criteria. ROC curves were generated to assess the diagnostic accuracy of different approaches. Results: In the multivariate analysis of the 79 lesions, time-to-peak enhancement and the descriptor of margins were found to be the most important independent factors for distinguishing benign from malignant lesions, and formed the basis of the scoring system. The areas under the ROC curves for the standard evaluation, and the scoring system were 0.813 and 0.880 in the 30 lesions. Conclusion: Time-to-peak enhancement and the descriptor of margins appear to be the most important diagnostic criteria for mass lesions in dynamic breast MR imaging.

[1]  D M Ikeda,et al.  Lesion Diagnosis Working Group Report , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  S E Harms,et al.  MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. , 1993, Radiology.

[3]  E A Sickles,et al.  Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  L J van Erning,et al.  MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique. , 1994, Radiology.

[5]  M. Kitajima,et al.  Characterization of Breast Masses by Dynamic Enhanced MR Imaging , 1999, Acta radiologica.

[6]  W. Kaiser,et al.  MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. , 1989, Radiology.

[7]  Nunes Lw.  Architectural-based interpretations of breast MR imaging. , 2001 .

[8]  Thomas Beier,et al.  Undetected malignancies of the breast: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 1.0 T. , 2002, Radiology.

[9]  U. Fischer,et al.  International investigation of breast MRI: results of a multicentre study (11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters for contrast-enhanced MRI based on 519 histopathologically correlated lesions , 2001, European Radiology.

[10]  M D Schnall,et al.  Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. , 1997, Radiology.

[11]  E. Grabbe,et al.  MRI of the breast in patients with metastatic disease of unknown primary , 1999, European Radiology.

[12]  Value of MR imaging in clinical evaluation of breast lesions , 2002 .

[13]  C K Kuhl,et al.  Dynamic image interpretation of MRI of the breast , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  M D Schnall,et al.  A combined architectural and kinetic interpretation model for breast MR images. , 2001, Academic radiology.

[15]  S E Harms,et al.  Evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic response of locally advanced breast cancer by magnetic resonance imaging , 1996, Cancer.

[16]  M D Schnall,et al.  Correlation of lesion appearance and histologic findings for the nodes of a breast MR imaging interpretation model. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[17]  E. Grabbe,et al.  Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast , 2002, European Radiology.

[18]  W. Kaiser,et al.  Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast‐enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  S. Heywang-Köbrunner,et al.  Contrast‐Enhanced MRI of the Breast after Limited Surgery and Radiation Therapy , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[20]  C P Langlotz,et al.  Accuracy of MR imaging in the work-up of suspicious breast lesions: a diagnostic meta-analysis. , 1999, Academic radiology.

[21]  M D Schnall,et al.  Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. , 1994, Radiology.

[22]  Sh. Heywang Kobrunner.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast , 1994 .

[23]  D Krebs,et al.  Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. , 2000, Radiology.

[24]  L. Nunes.  Architectural-based interpretations of breast MR imaging. , 2001, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[25]  Heywang-Köbrunner Sh,et al.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. , 1994, Investigative radiology.

[26]  U. Bick,et al.  Differentiation between benign and malignant findings on MR-mammography: usefulness of morphological criteria , 2001, European Radiology.

[27]  S. Heywang,et al.  MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. , 1989, Radiology.

[28]  Rolf Vosshenrich,et al.  Signalverhalten maligner und benigner Läsionen in der dynamischen 2D-MRT der Mamma , 1993 .

[29]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? , 1999, Radiology.

[30]  J F Debatin,et al.  Improved diagnostic accuracy in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast by combined quantitative and qualitative analysis. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[31]  J T Ennis,et al.  Breast disease: tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles. , 1990, Radiology.

[32]  J O Barentsz,et al.  Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. , 1995, Radiology.

[33]  L D Buadu,et al.  Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. , 1996, Radiology.

[34]  E. Azavedo,et al.  Imaging breasts with silicone implants , 1999, European Radiology.