Functional Magnetic Resonance Urography in Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: Proposal for a Pediatric Quantitative Score

Background: Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is one of the most frequent causes of congenital hydronephrosis. It is essential to distinguish UPJO which needs surgical treatment. fMRU combines high quality morphological details of the kidney and excretory pathways with functional data. Objective This study aims to introduce a new radiological score based on fMRU findings to be able to differentiate surgical from non-surgical kidneys. Materials and Methods We retrospectively selected patients with hydronephrosis due to UPJO who underwent fMRU (January 2009–June 2018). A multidisciplinary team identified a list of fMRU morpho-functional predictive variables to be included in the analysis. To evaluate the role of different independent variables in predicting the outcome, a multivariable logistic regression model has been performed; the outcome variable was the surgical intervention. For each predictive variable, Odds Ratio and 95% Confidence Intervals were calculated. The likelihood ratio test was used to assess the significance of the variables. Using the regression model, we assigned a numerical value to each predictive variable, rounding up the beta-coefficients. The cut-off value of the total score was obtained from the ROC curve analysis. Results A total of 192 patients were enrolled, corresponding to 200 pathological kidneys. All of them underwent fMRU; 135 were surgically treated, while 65 underwent ultrasound or MRU follow-up. Predictive variables significantly associated with surgery resulted to be the urographic phase, the presence of abnormal vessels, and a baseline anterior-posterior pelvic diameter >23 mm. Beta coefficients of the logistic regression model were then converted in scores. The ROC curve of the score showed high sensitivity (84.3%) and specificity (81.3%) with a cut-off > 2.5. Conclusions We propose a new fMRU score able to identify surgical vs. non-surgical kidneys with UPJO.

[1]  G. Ghiggeri,et al.  Is the lower pole crossing vessels transposition a valid option for the treatment of extrinsic ureteropelvic obstruction in children? Considerations from a single-centre experience , 2020, Journal of Pediatric Endoscopic Surgery.

[2]  M. Bodria,et al.  Comparative Study Between Functional MR Urography and Renal Scintigraphy to Evaluate Drainage Curves and Split Renal Function in Children With Congenital Anomalies of Kidney and Urinary Tract (CAKUT) , 2020, Frontiers in Pediatrics.

[3]  R. Babu,et al.  Hydronephrosis severity score: an objective assessment of hydronephrosis severity in children-a preliminary report. , 2019, Journal of pediatric urology.

[4]  E. Yılmaz,et al.  Value of renal pelvic diameter and urinary tract dilation classification in the prediction of urinary tract anomaly , 2019, Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society.

[5]  I. Mendichovszky,et al.  Nuclear Medicine in Pediatric Nephro-Urology: An Overview. , 2017, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[6]  J. Oliveria,et al.  Percent improvement in renal pelvis antero-posterior diameter (PI-APD): Prospective validation and further exploration of cut-off values that predict success after pediatric pyeloplasty supporting safe monitoring with ultrasound alone. , 2016, Journal of pediatric urology.

[7]  S. Arena,et al.  Spontaneous resolution of congenital anomalies of the kidney and the urinary tract (CAKUT) , 2016, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[8]  S. Warmann,et al.  Differences between intrinsic and extrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction related to crossing vessels: histology and functional analyses , 2016, World Journal of Urology.

[9]  J. Wisser,et al.  Outcome after prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract , 2016, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[10]  K. Darge,et al.  Detection of crossing vessels in pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Clinical patterns and imaging findings. , 2015, Journal of pediatric urology.

[11]  K. Sodhi,et al.  Hydronephrosis: Comparison of extrinsic vessel versus intrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction groups and a plea against the vascular hitch procedure. , 2015, Journal of pediatric urology.

[12]  C. Cooper,et al.  Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification system). , 2014, Journal of pediatric urology.

[13]  Hong-lin Cheng.  Surgical indications for unilateral neonatal hydronephrosis in considering ureteropelvic junction obstruction , 2014 .

[14]  C. Alberti.  Congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction: physiopathology, decoupling of tout court pelvic dilatation-obstruction semantic connection, biomarkers to predict renal damage evolution. , 2012, European review for medical and pharmacological sciences.

[15]  W. Apoznański,et al.  Changes in interstitial cell of Cajal-like cells density in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction , 2011, International Urology and Nephrology.

[16]  M. Riccabona,et al.  Erratum to: ESPR uroradiology task force and ESUR paediatric working group: imaging and procedural recommendations in paediatric uroradiology, part III. Minutes of the ESPR uroradiology task force minisymposium on intravenous urography, uro-CT and MR-urography in childhood , 2011, Pediatric Radiology.

[17]  Richard A. Jones,et al.  Pediatric magnetic resonance urography , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  M. Riccabona,et al.  ESPR uroradiology task force and ESUR paediatric working group: imaging and procedural recommendations in paediatric uroradiology, part III. Minutes of the ESPR uroradiology task force minisymposium on intravenous urography, uro-CT and MR-urography in childhood , 2010, Pediatric Radiology.

[19]  L. Baker,et al.  Histologic differences between extrinsic and intrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction. , 2008, Urology.

[20]  P. Vivier,et al.  MR urography in children. Part 1: how we do the F0 technique , 2010, Pediatric Radiology.

[21]  P. Vivier,et al.  MR urography in children. Part 2: how to use ImageJ MR urography processing software , 2010, Pediatric Radiology.

[22]  S. Parodi,et al.  Renal outcome in patients with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. , 2009, Kidney international.

[23]  Richard A. Jones,et al.  MR urography: technique and results for the evaluation of urinary obstruction in the pediatric population. , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[24]  D. F. Thomas.  Prenatally diagnosed urinary tract abnormalities: long-term outcome. , 2008, Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine.

[25]  G. Bartsch,et al.  Comparison of contrast-enhanced color Doppler imaging (CDI), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of crossing vessels in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). , 2008, European urology.

[26]  A. Gharavi,et al.  Genetic approaches to human renal agenesis/hypoplasia and dysplasia , 2007, Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, West).

[27]  M. Pearle,et al.  Functional assessment of crossing vessels as etiology of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. , 2007, Urology.

[28]  Richard A. Jones,et al.  MR urography evaluation of obstructive uropathy , 2007, Pediatric Radiology.

[29]  P. Mahadevan,et al.  An overview , 2007, Journal of Biosciences.

[30]  A. Mishra.  Crossing renal vessel causing ureteropelvic junction obstruction. , 2006, Saudi medical journal.

[31]  Charles E Metz,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[32]  A. Kirsch,et al.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Urography in the Evaluation of Pediatric Hydronephrosis: Part 2, Anatomic and Functional Assessment of Uteropelvic Junction Obstruction , 2005 .

[33]  B. Kogan,et al.  Prenatal ultrasound has led to earlier detection and repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[34]  S. Fernbach,et al.  Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: Introduction to the system used by the society for fetal urology , 1993, Pediatric Radiology.

[35]  A. Kirsch,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR urography in the evaluation of pediatric hydronephrosis: Part 2, anatomic and functional assessment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction [corrected]. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[36]  M. Riccabona.  Pediatric MRU—its potential and its role in the diagnostic work-up of upper urinary tract dilatation in infants and children , 2004, World Journal of Urology.

[37]  P. Androulakakis,et al.  Pelvi‐ureteric junction obstruction by crossing renal vessels: clinical and imaging features , 2003, BJU international.

[38]  James D. Frost,et al.  Long-Term Outcome , 2003 .

[39]  B. Tönshoff,et al.  Functional and morphologic evaluation of congenital urinary tract dilatation by using combined static-dynamic MR urography: findings in kidneys with a single collecting system. , 2002, Radiology.

[40]  M. Woodward,et al.  Postnatal management of antenatal hydronephrosis , 2002, BJU international.

[41]  S. Rosen,et al.  Ureteropelvic junction obstruction: morphological and clinical studies , 2000, Pediatric Nephrology.

[42]  D. Farrar,et al.  Diuresis renography in equivocal urinary tract obstruction. , 1978, British journal of urology.

[43]  H. Testa,et al.  Idiopathic hydronephrosis--the diuresis renogram: a new non-invasive method of assessing equivocal pelvioureteral junction obstruction. , 1979, The Journal of urology.

[44]  B. Roth,et al.  Pediatric urology. , 1960, The Nebraska state medical journal.