Compensating Hand Function in Chronic Stroke Patients Through the Robotic Sixth Finger

A novel solution to compensate hand grasping abilities is proposed for chronic stroke patients. The goal is to provide the patients with a wearable robotic extra-finger that can be worn on the paretic forearm by means of an elastic band. The proposed prototype, the Robotic Sixth Finger, is a modular articulated device that can adapt its structure to the grasped object shape. The extra-finger and the paretic hand act like the two parts of a gripper cooperatively holding an object. We evaluated the feasibility of the approach with four chronic stroke patients performing a qualitative test, the Frenchay Arm Test. In this proof of concept study, the use of the Robotic Sixth Finger has increased the total score of the patients by two points in a five points scale. The subjects were able to perform the two grasping tasks included in the test that were not possible without the robotic extra-finger. Adding a robotic opposing finger is a very promising approach that can significantly improve the functional compensation of the chronic stroke patient during everyday life activities.

[1]  R L Hewer,et al.  Enhanced physical therapy for arm function after stroke: a one year follow up study. , 1994, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[2]  M. Levin,et al.  What Do Motor “Recovery” and “Compensation” Mean in Patients Following Stroke? , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[3]  Peng Pan,et al.  Human interaction with passive assistive robots , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[4]  H. Krebs,et al.  Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[5]  Grant D. Huang,et al.  Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  A. Culyer.  International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health , 2014 .

[7]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Presence of Finger Extension and Shoulder Abduction Within 72 Hours After Stroke Predicts Functional Recovery: Early Prediction of Functional Outcome After Stroke: The EPOS Cohort Study , 2010, Stroke.

[8]  Francesco Giovacchini,et al.  Mechatronic Design and Characterization of the Index Finger Module of a Hand Exoskeleton for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation , 2012, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[9]  G. Oriolo,et al.  Robotics: Modelling, Planning and Control , 2008 .

[10]  Claudio Pacchierotti,et al.  Vibrotactile haptic feedback for intuitive control of robotic extra fingers , 2015, 2015 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC).

[11]  S. Kranz.  Upper Extremity Function in Stroke Subjects: Relationships between the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Domains , 2012 .

[12]  Claudio Pacchierotti,et al.  Using the robotic sixth finger and vibrotactile feedback for grasp compensation in chronic stroke patients , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[13]  Soo-Jin Lee,et al.  Current hand exoskeleton technologies for rehabilitation and assistive engineering , 2012 .

[14]  J. Marler,et al.  Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. , 1989, Stroke.

[15]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Predicting improvement in the upper paretic limb after stroke: a longitudinal prospective study. , 2007, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[16]  M. Levin,et al.  Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  T. Olsen,et al.  Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  Agnès Roby-Brami,et al.  Hand orientation for grasping and arm joint rotation patterns in healthy subjects and hemiparetic stroke patients , 2003, Brain Research.

[19]  M. Levin,et al.  Compensation for distal impairments of grasping in adults with hemiparesis , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2014, Circulation.

[21]  N. Hogan,et al.  Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option? , 2001, Current opinion in neurology.

[22]  Francesco Chinello,et al.  An object-based mapping algorithm to control wearable robotic extra-fingers , 2014, 2014 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics.

[23]  N. Miller,et al.  Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[24]  Monica Malvezzi,et al.  The Sixth-Finger: A modular extra-finger to enhance human hand capabilities , 2014, The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[25]  S. Masiero,et al.  Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[26]  A. Sunderland,et al.  Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. , 1987, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[27]  R Langton-Hewer,et al.  The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. , 1983, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[28]  Gerardo Lafferriere,et al.  Fine manipulation with multifinger hands , 1990, Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[29]  Rahsaan J. Holley,et al.  Robotic Approaches for Rehabilitation of Hand Function After Stroke , 2012, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.