Predicting global dynamics from local interactions: individual-based models predict complex features of marine epibenthic communities

Abstract Spatially explicit community models often generate a wide range of complex dynamics and behaviours, but the predictions of community structure and dynamics from many of these models are rarely compared with the natural communities they are intended to represent. Here, we develop a spatially explicit individual-based model of a complex marine epibenthic community and test its ability to predict the dynamics and structure of the natural community on which the model is based. We studied a natural epibenthic community on small-scale patches of jetty wall to estimate the outcomes of pair-wise interactions among individuals of different species, neighbour-specific growth rates, and species-specific recruitment and mortality rates. The model is defined with rules acting at two spatial scales: (1) between individual cells on the spatial landscape that define the nature of interactions, growth and recruitment at a scale of 1 cm 2 , and (2) at the scale of whole colonies (blocks of contiguous cells) that define size-specific mortality and limitations to the maximum size of colonies for some species for scales up to 1000 cm 2 . The model is compared to the existing patches on the jetty wall and proves to be a good descriptor of the large range of possible communities on the jetty, and of the multivariate variances of the patches. The high variability in community structure predicted by the model, which is similar to that observed in the natural community, arises from observed variability in parameters of interaction outcomes, growth, recruitment, and mortality of each species. Thus if the processes we modelled operate similarly in nature, our results suggest that it is difficult to attempt to predict the precise trajectory of the community in a particular patch. Our results show that it is possible to develop a testable, predictive spatial model where the patch-scale community patterns of structure and dynamics are emergent, arising from local processes between colonies and species-specific demography.

[1]  A. J. Lotka,et al.  Elements of Physical Biology. , 1925, Nature.

[2]  J. A. Rubin.  The degree of intransitivity and its measurement in an assemblage of encrusting cheilostome bryozoa , 1982 .

[3]  R. Osman,et al.  The influence of resident adults on recruitment: a comparison to settlement , 1995 .

[4]  J. Wootton,et al.  PREDICTION IN COMPLEX COMMUNITIES: ANALYSIS OF EMPIRICALLY DERIVED MARKOV MODELS , 2001 .

[5]  Janusz Uchmański,et al.  Resource partitioning among competing individuals and population persistence: an individual-based model , 2000 .

[6]  G. Russ.  Effects of predation by fishes, competition, and structural complexity of the substratum on the establishment of a marine epifaunal community , 1980 .

[7]  J. Winston,et al.  Ecology of cryptic coral reef communities. I. Distribution and abundance of major groups of encrusting organisms , 1982 .

[8]  A. Ives,et al.  Stability and variability in competitive communities. , 1999, Science.

[9]  Michael S. Mitchell,et al.  A mechanistic home range model for optimal use of spatially distributed resources , 2004 .

[10]  V. Grimm.  Ten years of individual-based modelling in ecology: what have we learned and what could we learn in the future? , 1999 .

[11]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Simplifying Spatial Complexity , 2000 .

[12]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[13]  J. Jackson.  Competition on Marine Hard Substrata: The Adaptive Significance of Solitary and Colonial Strategies , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[14]  Florian Jeltsch,et al.  From snapshot information to long-term population dynamics of Acacias by a simulation model , 2000, Plant Ecology.

[15]  J. B. Jackson,et al.  Do Corals Lie About Their Age? Some Demographic Consequences of Partial Mortality, Fission, and Fusion , 1980, Science.

[16]  J. Gappa.  Overgrowth competition in an assemblage of encrusting bryozoans settled on artificial substrata , 1989 .

[17]  R. Durrett,et al.  The Importance of Being Discrete (and Spatial) , 1994 .

[18]  C. Johnson,et al.  Invasion rates increase with species richness in a marine epibenthic community by two mechanisms , 2003, Oecologia.

[19]  C. Johnson,et al.  Selection for restraint in competitive ability in spatial competition systems , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  J. Jackson.  Overgrowth competition between encrusting cheilostome ectoprocts in a jamaican cryptic reef environment , 1979 .

[21]  L. Buss,et al.  Alleopathy and spatial competition among coral reef invertebrates. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  J. Dushoff,et al.  Local frequency dependence and global coexistence. , 1999, Theoretical population biology.

[23]  M. Keough,et al.  Recruitment of marine invertebrates: the role of active larval choices and early mortality , 1982, Oecologia.

[24]  J. Silvertown,et al.  The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Spatial Interactions among Grassland Plant Populations , 2000 .

[25]  P. Sale,et al.  Modelling settlement in open populations of reef fishes , 1999 .

[26]  D. Tilman.  Competition and Biodiversity in Spatially Structured Habitats , 1994 .

[27]  T. Hughes,et al.  Recruitment Limitation, Mortality, and Population Regulation in Open Systems: A Case Study , 1990 .

[28]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Spatial structure and the survival of an inferior competitor: a theoretical model of neighbourhood competition in plants , 2002 .

[29]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  A DYNAMICAL SYSTEM FOR NEIGHBORHOODS INPLANT COMMUNITIES , 2000 .

[30]  L. Buss,et al.  Competitive Networks: Nontransitive Competitive Relationships in Cryptic Coral Reef Environments , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[31]  Jonathan Silvertown,et al.  Cellular Automaton Models of Interspecific Competition for Space--The Effect of Pattern on Process , 1992 .

[32]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[33]  K. Nandakumar,et al.  Interspecific competition among fouling organisms in Tomioka Bay, Japan , 1993 .

[34]  B. Okamura.  MICROHABITAT VARIATION AND PATTERNS OF COLONY GROWTH AND FEEDING IN A MARINE BRYOZOAN , 1992 .

[35]  L. Buss,et al.  Bryozoan overgrowth interactions—the interdependence of competition for space and food , 1979, Nature.

[36]  S. Levin.  The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[37]  Craig R. Johnson.  Self-organizing in spatial competition systems , 1997 .

[38]  C. J. Hurlbut.  Larval substratum selection and postsettlement mortality as determinants of the distribution of two bryozoans , 1991 .

[39]  L. Berec.  Techniques of spatially explicit individual-based models: construction, simulation, and mean-field analysis , 2002 .

[40]  K. Wiegand,et al.  Minimum recruitment frequency in plants with episodic recruitment , 2004, Oecologia.

[41]  A. J. Lotka.  Elements of Physical Biology. , 1925, Nature.

[42]  C. Johnson,et al.  Competition coefficients in a marine epibenthic assemblage depend on spatial structure , 2003 .

[43]  R. Grosberg.  Competitive ability influences habitat choice in marine invertebrates , 1981, Nature.

[44]  L. Buss,et al.  Competition within and between encrusting clonal invertebrates. , 1990, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[45]  M. Boerlijst,et al.  Selection at the level of the community: the importance of spatial structure , 2002 .

[46]  Tomáš Herben,et al.  Spatio-temporal Patterns in Grassland Communities , 1999 .

[47]  M. Dick,et al.  Overgrowth competition in encrusting bryozoan assemblages of the intertidal and infralittoral zones of Alaska , 2000 .

[48]  J. Timothy Wootton,et al.  Local interactions predict large-scale pattern in empirically derived cellular automata , 2001, Nature.

[49]  J. Tews,et al.  Modeling seed dispersal in a variable environment: a case study of the fleshy-fruited savanna shrub Grewia flava , 2004 .