Closed-loop functional optogenetic stimulation

Optogenetics has been used to orchestrate temporal- and tissue-specific control of neural tissues and offers a wealth of unique advantages for neuromuscular control. Here, we establish a closed-loop functional optogenetic stimulation (CL-FOS) system to control ankle joint position in murine models. Using the measurement of either joint angle or fascicle length as a feedback signal, we compare the controllability of CL-FOS to closed-loop functional electrical stimulation (CL-FES) and demonstrate significantly greater accuracy, lower rise times and lower overshoot percentages. We demonstrate orderly recruitment of motor units and reduced fatigue when performing cyclical movements with CL-FOS compared with CL-FES. We develop and investigate a 3-phase, photo-kinetic model to elucidate the underlying mechanisms for temporal variations in optogenetically activated neuromusculature during closed-loop control experiments. Methods and insights from this study lay the groundwork for the development of closed-loop optogenetic neuromuscular stimulation therapies and devices for peripheral limb control.Optogenetics is a promising alternative approach for restoration of neuromuscular function. Here the authors establish a closed-loop functional optogenetic stimulation for the control of limb joint angle in murine models, which demonstrates improved control and less fatigue than electrical stimulation systems.

[1]  Hugh M Herr,et al.  A murine model of a novel surgical architecture for proprioceptive muscle feedback and its potential application to control of advanced limb prostheses , 2017, Journal of neural engineering.

[2]  M. Keith,et al.  A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[3]  P. Peckham,et al.  Neural prostheses: clinical applications of functional electrical stimulation in spinal cord injury , 1992, Paraplegia.

[4]  R. Granit THE HEART ( Extract from “ Principles and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields , 2005 .

[5]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Orderly recruitment of motor units under optical control in vivo , 2010, Nature Medicine.

[6]  P. Peckham,et al.  Functional electrical stimulation for neuromuscular applications. , 2005, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[7]  Robert W Gereau,et al.  Spotlight on pain: optogenetic approaches for interrogating somatosensory circuits , 2016, Pain.

[8]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  Spectrally distinct channelrhodopsins for two-colour optogenetic peripheral nerve stimulation , 2018, Nature Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Jonas B. Zimmermann,et al.  Closed-loop control of spinal cord stimulation to restore hand function after paralysis , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[10]  J. Gordon,et al.  Modeling the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Light and Heat Propagation for In Vivo Optogenetics. , 2015, Cell reports.

[11]  Karl Deisseroth,et al.  Beyond the brain: Optogenetic control in the spinal cord and peripheral nervous system , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[12]  Senova Suhan,et al.  Experimental assessment of the safety and potential efficacy of high irradiance photostimulation of brain tissues , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[13]  Percy Nohama,et al.  Artificial motor control for electrically stimulated upper limbs of plegic or paretic people , 2016 .

[14]  Shriya Srinivasan,et al.  Transdermal optogenetic peripheral nerve stimulation , 2017, Journal of neural engineering.

[15]  R W Pho,et al.  Clinical applications of functional electrical stimulation. , 1995, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[16]  Dudley S. Childress,et al.  Closed-loop control in prosthetic systems: Historical perspective , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Jeremy Fairbank,et al.  Historical Perspective , 1984, Language in Society.

[18]  Robert E Dempski,et al.  Adjacent channelrhodopsin-2 residues within transmembranes 2 and 7 regulate cation selectivity and distribution of the two open states , 2017, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  Linda Greensmith,et al.  Restoring motor function using optogenetics and neural engraftment. , 2016, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[20]  Vaughan G. Macefield,et al.  A Review of Control Strategies in Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetic Systems , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[21]  Andreas Möglich,et al.  Channelrhodopsin engineering and exploration of new optogenetic tools , 2011, Nature Methods.

[22]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  H. Herr,et al.  On prosthetic control: A regenerative agonist-antagonist myoneural interface , 2017, Science Robotics.

[24]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  An Approach for the Cooperative Control of FES With a Powered Exoskeleton During Level Walking for Persons With Paraplegia , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[25]  E. Bamberg,et al.  Channelrhodopsin-2, a directly light-gated cation-selective membrane channel , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Carmen Birchmeier,et al.  Touch Receptor-Derived Sensory Information Alleviates Acute Pain Signaling and Fine-Tunes Nociceptive Reflex Coordination , 2017, Neuron.

[27]  A. M. Seifalian,et al.  10 – Optogenetics: lights, camera, action! A ray of light, a shadow unmasked , 2015 .

[28]  Loredana Zollo,et al.  Control of Prosthetic Hands via the Peripheral Nervous System , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[29]  K. L. Montgomery,et al.  Optogenetic Control of Targeted Peripheral Axons in Freely Moving Animals , 2013, PloS one.

[30]  Mario I. Romero-Ortega,et al.  Material considerations for peripheral nerve interfacing , 2012 .

[31]  Ángel Gil-Agudo,et al.  Hybrid FES-robot cooperative control of ambulatory gait rehabilitation exoskeleton , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[32]  D. McCreery,et al.  Damage in peripheral nerve from continuous electrical stimulation: Comparison of two stimulus waveforms , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[33]  Shriya S Srinivasan,et al.  Proprioception from a neurally controlled lower-extremity prosthesis , 2018, Science Translational Medicine.

[34]  Alix Rolfe,et al.  Spotlight On . . . , 2013 .

[35]  D. Currier,et al.  Pain complaint: comparison of electrical stimulation with conventional isometric exercise. , 1984, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[36]  R. Kobetic,et al.  Neurotherapeutic and neuroprosthetic effects of implanted functional electrical stimulation for ambulation after incomplete spinal cord injury. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[37]  Lief E. Fenno,et al.  The Microbial Opsin Family of Optogenetic Tools , 2011, Cell.

[38]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Theoretical principles underlying optical stimulation of myelinated axons expressing channelrhodopsin-2 , 2013, Neuroscience.

[39]  Patrick Degenaar,et al.  Photocycles of Channelrhodopsin‐2 , 2009, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[40]  L. Mendell,et al.  The size principle: a rule describing the recruitment of motoneurons. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.