Additional value of electrical impedance scanning: experience of 240 histologically-proven breast lesions.

The aim of this study was to quantify the clinical value of using electrical impedance scanning (EIS) as an adjunct to other diagnostic techniques in order to identify cancerous tissue based upon its inherent altered local dielectric properties. 210 consecutive women with 240 sonographically and/or mammographically suspicious findings were examined using EIS. All lesions were histologically-proven. 86/103 malignant and 91/137 benign lesions were correctly identified using EIS (87.8% sensitivity, 66.4% specificity). NPV and PPV of 84.3% and 65.2% were observed, respectively. Excluding cases as defined by a priori criteria, i.e. lesions located deeper than 35 mm, lesions larger than 35 mm, and retroareolar lesions, a sensitivity of 85.5% was observed, and for invasive cancers, 91.7%. The detection rate for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) was poor (57.1%, n=14). By adding EIS to mammography and ultrasound, the sensitivity rose from 86.4 to 95.1%, whereas the accuracy decreased from 82.3 to 75.7%. EIS appears to be of interest as an adjunct to breast diagnostic techniques, performing with a reasonable sensitivity. Further investigations on histomorphological characteristics and the reasons for false-negative findings are essential to gain further knowledge about the bioelectricity of breast lesions, and prove the value of this new technology.

[1]  E. Frei,et al.  Breast cancer screening by impedance measurements. , 1990, Frontiers of medical and biological engineering : the international journal of the Japan Society of Medical Electronics and Biological Engineering.

[2]  J. Elmore,et al.  Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Volker Barth,et al.  Electropotential measurements as a new diagnostic modality for breast cancer , 1998, The Lancet.

[4]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. , 1996, JAMA.

[5]  T Iritani,et al.  [In vivo measurements of electrical bio-impedance of breast tumors]. , 1988, Nihon Geka Gakkai zasshi.

[6]  H. Sittek,et al.  Electrical impedance measurement of the breast: effect of hormonal changes associated with the menstrual cycle , 2000, European Radiology.

[7]  M. Morrow,et al.  Preoperative evaluation of abnormal mammographic findings to avoid unnecessary breast biopsies. , 1994, Archives of surgery.

[8]  J Jossinet,et al.  The impedivity of freshly excised human breast tissue , 1998, Physiological measurement.

[9]  T. Boehm,et al.  Electrical impedance scanning for classifying suspicious breast lesions: first results , 2000, European Radiology.

[10]  G. van Kaick,et al.  [Breast cancer screening. State of the art and introduction to preventive measures]. , 1993, Der Radiologe.

[11]  C A Kelsey,et al.  Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. , 1998, Radiology.

[12]  Stuchly,et al.  Dielectric properties of breast carcinoma and the surrounding tissues , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  J P Morucci,et al.  Bioelectrical impedance techniques in medicine. Part I: Bioimpedance measurement. Second section: impedance spectrometry. , 1996, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[14]  A. Wilson,et al.  Breast imaging, 2nd edn , 1998 .