Temperature and Probe‐to‐Probe Variability Effects on the Performance of Capacitance Soil Moisture Sensors in an Oxisol

Reliable and accurate monitoring of soil water content (θ) across the landscape is indispensable for many water resources applications. Capacitance-based in situ soil water content measuring devices are extensively used despite their sensitivity to soil properties besides water content, e.g., temperature and organic matter content. The main goals of this study were to: (i) examine the effects of temperature, hysteresis of the temperature response, and probe-to-probe variability on the performance of three (5TE, EC-5, and EC-TM) single capacitance sensors (SCS) in a Hawaiian Oxisol; and (ii) develop empirical calibration equations to correct for temperature and improve measurement accuracy. The SCS raw output and thermocouple temperature measurements were recorded at 1-min intervals during heating and cooling cycles between 1 and 45°C. The three SCS and thermocouples were inserted in uniformly packed soils with θ varying from 0 to 0.55 m3 m−3. We used three probes for each SCS, and the entire experiment was replicated with two heating and cooling cycles. Temperature, hysteresis, and the probe-to-probe variability effects were highly significant ( p 90% reduction in interquartile range) in measured water content due to changing soil temperature. Applying differing temperature corrections for heating and cooling did not improve the calibration any further.

[1]  M. Safeeq,et al.  Adjusting Temperature and Salinity Effects on Single Capacitance Sensors , 2009 .

[2]  Tissa H. Illangasekare,et al.  Empirical two‐point α‐mixing model for calibrating the ECH2O EC‐5 soil moisture sensor in sands , 2008 .

[3]  W. H. Gardner Water Content , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[4]  Lawrence R. Parsons,et al.  Performance of a New Capacitance Soil Moisture Probe in a Sandy Soil , 2009 .

[5]  Jan W. Hopmans,et al.  Frequency, electrical conductivity and temperature analysis of a low-cost capacitance soil moisture sensor , 2008 .

[6]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines , 1980 .

[7]  Konstantinos X. Soulis,et al.  Performance Analysis and Calibration of a New Low-Cost Capacitance Soil Moisture Sensor , 2012 .

[8]  Egbert J. A. Spaans,et al.  Calibration of Watermark soil moisture sensors for soil matric potential and temperature , 1992, Plant and Soil.

[9]  D. K. Cassel,et al.  Practical considerations for using a TDR cable tester , 1994 .

[10]  A. McClellan,et al.  Soils of Hawai'i , 2007 .

[11]  Mark S. Seyfried,et al.  Measurement of soil water content with a 50-MHz soil dielectric sensor , 2004 .

[12]  Marnik Vanclooster,et al.  Validation of ground penetrating radar full-waveform inversion for field scale soil moisture mapping , 2012 .

[13]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[14]  R. E. Danielson,et al.  Porosity , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[15]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  Soil moisture mapping and AMSR-E validation using the PSR in SMEX02 , 2006 .

[16]  A. Klute Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. , 1988 .

[17]  Nigel J. Livingston,et al.  Temperature‐Dependent Measurement Errors in Time Domain Reflectometry Determinations of Soil Water , 1995 .

[18]  Mitsuhiro Inoue,et al.  Empirical Temperature Calibration of Capacitance Probes to Measure Soil Water , 2009 .

[19]  H. Vereecken,et al.  Evaluation of a low-cost soil water content sensor for wireless network applications , 2007 .

[20]  Commonwealth Scientific,et al.  Soil Water Assessment by the Neutron Method , 1981 .

[21]  Yann Kerr,et al.  Influence of Bound-Water Relaxation Frequency on Soil Moisture Measurements , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  Ali Fares,et al.  Temperature-Dependent Scaled Frequency: Improved Accuracy of Multisensor Capacitance Probes , 2007 .

[23]  James E. Ayars,et al.  Calibration of Capacitance Probe Sensors using Electric Circuit Theory , 2004 .

[24]  Robert J. Lascano,et al.  Laboratory Evaluation of a Commercial Dielectric Soil Water Sensor , 2003 .

[25]  G. Clarke Topp,et al.  State of the art of measuring soil water content , 2003 .

[26]  Gerrit H. de Rooij,et al.  Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 4. Physical Methods , 2004 .

[27]  D. Or,et al.  Temperature effects on soil bulk dielectric permittivity measured by time domain reflectometry: Experimental evidence and hypothesis development , 1999 .

[28]  George Kargas,et al.  Evaluation of a Dielectric Sensor for Measurement of Soil-Water Electrical Conductivity , 2010 .

[29]  co-editors Jacob H. Dane and G. Clarke Topp,et al.  Methods of soil analysis. Part 4, Physical methods , 2016 .

[30]  Soil Moisture Measurements: Comparison of Instrumentation Performances , 2010 .

[31]  Ali Fares,et al.  Advances in Crop Water Management Using Capacitive Water Sensors , 2006 .

[32]  Scott B. Jones,et al.  Standardizing Characterization of Electromagnetic Water Content Sensors: Part 1. Methodology , 2005 .

[33]  Pariva Dobriyal,et al.  A review of the methods available for estimating soil moisture and its implications for water resource management , 2012 .

[34]  Field Calibration and Monitoring of Soil-Water Content with Fiberglass Electrical Resistance Sensors , 1993 .

[35]  Johan Alexander Huisman,et al.  Correction of Temperature and Electrical Conductivity Effects on Dielectric Permittivity Measurements with ECH2O Sensors , 2011 .

[36]  Harry Vereecken,et al.  Sensor‐to‐Sensor Variability of the ECH2O EC‐5, TE, and 5TE Sensors in Dielectric Liquids , 2010 .

[37]  Clive A. Edwards,et al.  Encyclopedia of Soil Science , 2003 .

[38]  BOTANiCAL Gazette,et al.  Handbook of Soil Science , 1933, Botanical Gazette.

[39]  R. B. Grossman,et al.  2.1 Bulk Density and Linear Extensibility , 2018, SSSA Book Series.