Inertia Compensation Control of a One-Degree-of-Freedom Exoskeleton for Lower-Limb Assistance: Initial Experiments

A new method of lower-limb exoskeleton control aimed at improving the agility of leg-swing motion is presented. In the absence of control, an exoskeleton's mechanism usually hinders agility by adding mechanical impedance to the legs. The uncompensated inertia of the exoskeleton will reduce the natural frequency of leg swing, probably leading to lower step frequency during walking as well as increased metabolic energy consumption. The proposed controller emulates inertia compensation by adding a feedback loop consisting of low-pass filtered angular acceleration multiplied by a negative gain. This gain simulates negative inertia in the low-frequency range. The resulting controller combines two assistive effects: increasing the natural frequency of the lower limbs and performing net work per swing cycle. The controller was tested on a statically mounted exoskeleton that assists knee flexion and extension. Subjects performed movement sequences, first unassisted and then using the exoskeleton, in the context of a computer-based task resembling a race. In the exoskeleton's baseline state, the frequency of leg swing and the mean angular velocity were consistently reduced. The addition of inertia compensation enabled subjects to recover their normal frequency and increase their selected angular velocity. The work performed by the exoskeleton was evidenced by catch trials in the protocol.

[1]  Lihua Huang,et al.  On the Control of the Berkeley Lower Extremity Exoskeleton (BLEEX) , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  R. Kram,et al.  The effects of adding mass to the legs on the energetics and biomechanics of walking. , 2007, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  N. Huang,et al.  The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[4]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Automatic gait-pattern adaptation algorithms for rehabilitation with a 4-DOF robotic orthosis , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  G.S. Sawicki,et al.  Powered lower limb orthoses: applications in motor adaptation and rehabilitation , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[6]  M.A. Peshkin,et al.  Active-Impedance Control of a Lower-Limb Assistive Exoskeleton , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[7]  W. Rymer,et al.  In vivo human knee joint dynamic properties as functions of muscle contraction and joint position. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  H. van der Kooij,et al.  Design and Evaluation of the LOPES Exoskeleton Robot for Interactive Gait Rehabilitation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[9]  Conor James Walsh,et al.  Development of a lightweight, underactuated exoskeleton for load-carrying augmentation , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[10]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Design of an active one-degree-of-freedom lower-limb exoskeleton with inertia compensation , 2011, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[11]  G Aguirre-Ollinger,et al.  A One-Degree-of-Freedom Assistive Exoskeleton with Inertia Compensation: The Effects on the Agility of Leg Swing Motion , 2011, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[12]  Yoshiyuki Sankai,et al.  Power assist control for leg with HAL-3 based on virtual torque and impedance adjustment , 2002, IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[13]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Powered lower limb orthoses for gait rehabilitation. , 2005, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[14]  Aaron M. Dollar,et al.  Lower Extremity Exoskeletons and Active Orthoses: Challenges and State-of-the-Art , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[15]  Monica A. Daley,et al.  A Physiologist's Perspective on Robotic Exoskeletons for Human Locomotion , 2007, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[16]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  A 1-DOF assistive exoskeleton with virtual negative damping: effects on the kinematic response of the lower limbs , 2007, 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[17]  Yoshiyuki Sankai,et al.  Power assist method based on Phase Sequence and muscle force condition for HAL , 2005, Adv. Robotics.

[18]  Philip E. Martin,et al.  Manipulations of leg mass and moment of inertia: effects on energy cost of walking. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[19]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Mechanics and energetics of level walking with powered ankle exoskeletons , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[20]  Robert Riener,et al.  Generalized elasticities improve patient-cooperative control of rehabilitation robots , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[21]  W. S. Newman,et al.  Stability and Performance Limits of Interaction Controllers , 1992 .

[22]  James A. Norris,et al.  Effect of augmented plantarflexion power on preferred walking speed and economy in young and older adults. , 2007, Gait & posture.