Distal embolic protection during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes: The RUBY study

Objective: To assess the safety and feasibility of the GuardWireTM system as an embolic protection device during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Background: Distal embolization occurs in approximately 15% of patients after primary angioplasty and is associated with reduced myocardial reperfusion, more extensive myocardial damage and a poor prognosis. Distal embolic protection could reduce the rate of embolic complications and improve outcome. Methods: 329 patients (mean age 60±12 years) were included: 278 (84.5%) with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 50 (15.2%) with unstable angina/non‐STEMI and 1 (0.3%) with post‐infarction angina. Primary endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days. Secondary endpoints were the magnitude of ST‐segment resolution at 90 and 180 min post‐procedure, myocardial blush grade, and angiographically visible distal emboli. Results: The GuardWireTM system was successfully positioned in 99% of patients. Complete ST‐elevation resolution (>70%) was observed in 28.5% immediately post‐procedure, and in 35.4% and 41.6% at 90 and 180 min post‐procedure. TIMI‐3 flow grade was achieved by 89.8% of patients after intervention and mean corrected TIMI frame count was 20.2±13.2. Grade‐3 myocardial blush was seen in 47.7% of patients and distal emboli were angiographically visible in 7.4%. Incidence of MACE at 30 days was 3.3% (death 1.2%; Q‐wave MI 0.3%; non‐Q‐wave MI 0.3%; coronary artery bypass graft 0.6%; repeat PCI 0.9%). Conclusion: The GuardWireTM system was successfully positioned in nearly all patients without complications. The use of this embolic protection device in ACS patients undergoing PCI was associated with low rates of distal embolization and 30‐day MACE.

[1]  E. Edelman,et al.  Embolic Protection With Filtering or Occlusion Balloons During Saphenous Vein Graft Stenting Retrieves Identical Volumes and Sizes of Particulate Debris , 2004, Circulation.

[2]  I. Henry,et al.  Carotid angioplasty under cerebral protection with the percusurge guardwire system , 2004, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[3]  J. Tanigawa,et al.  CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE Original Studies Evaluation of the PercuSurge GuardWire Plus Temporary Occlusion and Aspiration System During Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2003 .

[4]  R. Blindt,et al.  Usefulness of myocardial blush grade early and late after primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction in predicting left ventricular function. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  Felix Zijlstra,et al.  Angiographic Assessment of Reperfusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction by Myocardial Blush Grade , 2003, Circulation.

[6]  F. Veith,et al.  Initial experience with cerebral protection devices to prevent embolization during carotid artery stenting. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[7]  J. Ottervanger,et al.  Incidence and clinical significance of distal embolization during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. , 2002, European heart journal.

[8]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Relationship of the TIMI Myocardial Perfusion Grades, Flow Grades, Frame Count, and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Long-Term Outcomes After Thrombolytic Administration in Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2002, Circulation.

[9]  M. Leon,et al.  Randomized Trial of a Distal Embolic Protection Device During Percutaneous Intervention of Saphenous Vein Aorto-Coronary Bypass Grafts , 2002, Circulation.

[10]  George Dangas,et al.  Impact of normalized myocardial perfusion after successful angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  C. Di Mario,et al.  Cerebral Protection With Filter Devices During Carotid Artery Stenting , 2001, Circulation.

[12]  E. Topol,et al.  Recognition of the importance of embolization in atherosclerotic vascular disease. , 2000, Circulation.

[13]  A. Kastrati,et al.  Primary intracoronary stenting in acute myocardial infarction: long-term clinical and angiographic follow-up and risk factor analysis. , 2000, American heart journal.

[14]  G. Stone,et al.  Coronary angioplasty with or without stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction. Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Bruce R. Brodie,et al.  Coronary Angioplasty with or without Stent Implantation for Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1999 .

[16]  S. Kownator,et al.  Carotid Stenting with Cerebral Protection: First Clinical Experience Using the PercuSurge GuardWire System , 1999, Journal of endovascular surgery : the official journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery.

[17]  C. Di Mario,et al.  Prevention of distal embolization during saphenous vein graft lesion angioplasty. Experience with a new temporary occlusion and aspiration system. , 1999, Circulation.

[18]  H. Suryapranata,et al.  Randomized comparison of coronary stenting with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 1998, Circulation.

[19]  H. Suryapranata,et al.  Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: myocardial blush grade. Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group. , 1998, Circulation.

[20]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review. , 1998, JAMA.

[21]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction : A quantitative review , 1997 .

[22]  M. Hori,et al.  Clinical implications of the 'no reflow' phenomenon. A predictor of complications and left ventricular remodeling in reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction. , 1996, Circulation.

[23]  P. Kligfield Primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction. , 1995, British heart journal.

[24]  J. Reiber,et al.  A comparison of immediate coronary angioplasty with intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  A. Kitabatake,et al.  Lack of Myocardial Perfusion Immediately After Successful Thrombolysis: A Predictor of Poor Recovery of Left Ventricular Function in Anterior Myocardial Infarction , 1992, Circulation.

[26]  R. Kloner,et al.  The "no-reflow" phenomenon after temporary coronary occlusion in the dog. , 1974, The Journal of clinical investigation.