Exploratory Movement Generates Higher-Order Information That Is Sufficient for Accurate Perception of Scaled Egocentric Distance

Body movement influences the structure of multiple forms of ambient energy, including optics and gravito-inertial force. Some researchers have argued that egocentric distance is derived from inferential integration of visual and non-visual stimulation. We suggest that accurate information about egocentric distance exists in perceptual stimulation as higher-order patterns that extend across optics and inertia. We formalize a pattern that specifies the egocentric distance of a stationary object across higher-order relations between optics and inertia. This higher-order parameter is created by self-generated movement of the perceiver in inertial space relative to the illuminated environment. For this reason, we placed minimal restrictions on the exploratory movements of our participants. We asked whether humans can detect and use the information available in this higher-order pattern. Participants judged whether a virtual object was within reach. We manipulated relations between body movement and the ambient structure of optics and inertia. Judgments were precise and accurate when the higher-order optical-inertial parameter was available. When only optic flow was available, judgments were poor. Our results reveal that participants perceived egocentric distance from the higher-order, optical-inertial consequences of their own exploratory activity. Analysis of participants’ movement trajectories revealed that self-selected movements were complex, and tended to optimize availability of the optical-inertial pattern that specifies egocentric distance. We argue that accurate information about egocentric distance exists in higher-order patterns of ambient energy, that self-generated movement can generate these higher-order patterns, and that these patterns can be detected and used to support perception of egocentric distance that is precise and accurate.

[1]  M. Banks,et al.  Perceiving heading with different retinal regions and types of optic flow , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Nicholas I. Fisher,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Spherical Data. , 1987 .

[3]  Daniel S. Mcconnell,et al.  Reaching measures of monocular distance perception: Forward versus side-to-side head movements and haptic feedback , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Jean-Louis Vercher,et al.  Fusion of visuo-ocular and vestibular signals in arm motor control. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  T. Stoffregen,et al.  On specification and the senses , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  Michael T Turvey,et al.  The Medium of Haptic Perception: A Tensegrity Hypothesis , 2014, Journal of motor behavior.

[7]  Benoît G. Bardy,et al.  Theory testing and the global array , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  N. Cliff Dominance statistics: Ordinal analyses to answer ordinal questions. , 1993 .

[9]  M T Turvey,et al.  Haptic probing: Perceiving the length of a probe and the distance of a surface probed , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Alexandre Pouget,et al.  A computational perspective on the neural basis of multisensory spatial representations , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[11]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Absolute motion parallax weakly determines visual scale in real and virtual environments , 1995, Electronic Imaging.

[12]  D R Proffitt,et al.  Comparing depth from motion with depth from binocular disparity. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  S. Ullman,et al.  The interpretation of visual motion , 1977 .

[14]  J. Bruner,et al.  The Coordination of Visual Observation and Instrumental Behavior in Early Infancy , 1973, Perception.

[15]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. , 2003 .

[16]  W H Warren,et al.  Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Felix Wichmann,et al.  The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  J. Gibson The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[19]  James M. Hillis,et al.  Combining Sensory Information: Mandatory Fusion Within, but Not Between, Senses , 2002, Science.

[20]  M. Goodale,et al.  Adapting to monocular vision: grasping with one eye , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  Jacques Droulez,et al.  Absolute distance perception during in-depth head movement: calibrating optic flow with extra-retinal information , 2002, Vision Research.

[22]  S. Link,et al.  Bias in Quantifying Judgments , 1989 .

[23]  A. Noē Direct Perception , 2022 .

[24]  C J Overbeeke,et al.  Depth on a Flat Screen , 1987, Perceptual and motor skills.

[25]  Eric L. Amazeen,et al.  Perceived Heaviness Is Influenced by the Style of Lifting , 2011 .

[26]  G. Johansson,et al.  Monocular Movement Parallax and Near-Space Perception , 1973 .

[27]  L. S. Mark,et al.  Postural dynamics and the preferred critical boundary for visually guided reaching. , 1997, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[28]  G P Bingham,et al.  The necessity of a perception-action approach to definite distance perception: monocular distance perception to guide reaching. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Kevin Shockley,et al.  Rotational inertia and multimodal heaviness perception , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  Andrew Rutherford Handbook of perception and human performance. Vol 1: Sensory processes and perception. Vol 2: Cognitive processes and performance. , 1987 .

[31]  Reinoud J. Bootsma,et al.  The Effects of Anxiety on Perceiving the Reachability of Passing Objects , 1992 .

[32]  J. Gibson,et al.  Parallax and perspective during aircraft landings. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[33]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  Absolute motion parallax and the specific distance tendency , 1973 .

[34]  L. S. Mark,et al.  Eyeheight-scaled information about affordances: a study of sitting and stair climbing. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  A. Yonas,et al.  Perceiving the affordance of contact in four- and five-month-old infants. , 1993, Child development.

[36]  H. C. Longuet-Higgins Visual motion ambiguity , 1986, Vision Research.

[37]  M. Turvey,et al.  Ecological laws of perceiving and acting: In reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn (1981) , 1981, Cognition.

[38]  S. R. Jammalamadaka,et al.  Directional Statistics, I , 2011 .

[39]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  A comparison of oculomotor and motion parallax cues of egocentric distance , 1979, Vision Research.

[40]  M. Turvey,et al.  Visually perceiving what is reachable. , 1989 .

[41]  E. Gibson Exploratory behavior in the development of perceiving, acting, and the acquiring of knowledge. , 1988 .

[42]  Kevin Shockley,et al.  Studies in perception and action IX : fourteenth International Conference on Perception and Action, July 1-6, 2007, Yokohama, Japan , 2008 .

[43]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Distance estimation in the mongolian gerbil: The role of dynamic depth cues , 1984, Behavioural Brain Research.

[44]  S. Runeson The distorted room illusion, equivalent configurations, and the specificity of static optic arrays. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  S. H. Ferris Motion parallax and absolute distance. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[46]  M T Turvey,et al.  Haptically perceiving the distances reachable with hand-held objects. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  J. Loomis,et al.  Visual space perception and visually directed action. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[49]  Benoît G. Bardy,et al.  Multimodal Perception of Reachability Expressed Through Locomotion , 2010 .

[50]  P. J. Stappers Scaling the visual consequences of active head movements: a study of active perceivers and spatial technology , 1992 .

[51]  Christopher C. Pagano,et al.  Using Radial Outflow to Provide Depth Information During Teleoperation , 2009, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[52]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[53]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  The Influence of Restricted Viewing Conditions on Egocentric Distance Perception: Implications for Real and Virtual Indoor Environments , 2005, Perception.

[54]  M. Laurent,et al.  Perception of a Stepping-Across Affordance , 1999 .

[55]  E. Sture Eriksson,et al.  Distance perception and the ambiguity of visual stimulation: A theoretical note , 1973 .

[56]  H. Strasburger,et al.  Fitting the psychometric function , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[57]  Geoffrey P. Bingham,et al.  Monocular Egocentric Distance Information Generated by Head Movement , 1994 .

[58]  G. K. Wallace Visual Scanning in the Desert Locust Schistocerca Gregaria Forskål , 1959 .

[59]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[60]  Heft Harry,et al.  A Methodological Note on Overestimates of Reaching Distance: Distinguishing Between Perceptual and Analytical Judgments , 1993 .

[61]  尾島 修一,et al.  IS & T/SPIE's Symposium on Electronic Imaging : Science & Technology , 1995 .

[62]  J. Droulez,et al.  Contribution of extraretinal signals to the scaling of object distance during self-motion , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[63]  D. Burr,et al.  The Ventriloquist Effect Results from Near-Optimal Bimodal Integration , 2004, Current Biology.

[64]  E. Sture Eriksson Movement parallax during locomotion , 1974 .

[65]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Optical Velocity Patterns, Velocity-Sensitive Neurons, and Space Perception: A Hypothesis , 1974, Perception.

[66]  M. Turvey Action and perception at the level of synergies. , 2007, Human movement science.

[67]  L. S. Mark,et al.  How Do Task Characteristics Affect the Transitions Between Seated and Standing Reaches? , 2001 .

[68]  Simon J Watt,et al.  The visual control of reaching and grasping: binocular disparity and motion parallax. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.