Walking the line: The fate of nanomaterials at biological barriers.

Biological systems have developed an efficient multi-tiered defense system to block foreign substances such as engineered nanomaterials (NMs) from causing damage. In a pathological scenario, the disease itself may also pose additional barriers due to the imbalance between abnormal cells and their surrounding microenvironment, and NMs could behave similarly or differently to classic foreign substances, depending on their unique characteristics. Thus, understanding the mechanisms that govern the fate of NMs against these biological barriers, including the strategies that can be used to shift their fate between access and blockage, become key information for NMs design. In this manuscript, we first describe the biological barriers that NMs may encounter, and further discuss how these biological barrier interactions could shift the fate of NMs between toxicity and therapeutic potential. A list of effects that may influence NMs access at nano/bio interface are presented and discussed, followed by personal insights on the important nano/bio topics that require additional research for a better understanding of NM/biological barrier interactions.

[1]  Claus-Michael Lehr,et al.  Nanoparticles--an efficient carrier for drug delivery into the hair follicles. , 2007, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[2]  R. Jain,et al.  Losartan inhibits collagen I synthesis and improves the distribution and efficacy of nanotherapeutics in tumors , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Hak Soo Choi,et al.  Rapid translocation of nanoparticles from the lung airspaces to the body , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  Wei Li,et al.  Full assessment of fate and physiological behavior of quantum dots utilizing Caenorhabditis elegans as a model organism. , 2011, Nano letters.

[5]  Y. Liu,et al.  Understanding the toxicity of carbon nanotubes. , 2013, Accounts of chemical research.

[6]  David Goldstein,et al.  Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Tian Xia,et al.  Use of size and a copolymer design feature to improve the biodistribution and the enhanced permeability and retention effect of doxorubicin-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles in a murine xenograft tumor model. , 2011, ACS nano.

[8]  M. Ferrari,et al.  The nano-plasma interface: Implications of the protein corona. , 2014, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[9]  Jean-Christophe Olivier,et al.  Drug transport to brain with targeted nanoparticles , 2011, NeuroRX.

[10]  Korsmeyer Richard Wilker Critical questions in development of targeted nanoparticle therapeutics , 2016 .

[11]  Q. He,et al.  The Route of Nanomaterials Entering Brain , 2017 .

[12]  Zongxi Li,et al.  Engineered design of mesoporous silica nanoparticles to deliver doxorubicin and P-glycoprotein siRNA to overcome drug resistance in a cancer cell line. , 2010, ACS nano.

[13]  Feng Zhao,et al.  Acute toxicological effects of copper nanoparticles in vivo. , 2006, Toxicology letters.

[14]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Repeated carbon nanotube administrations in male mice cause reversible testis damage without affecting fertility , 2010, Nature Nanotechnology.

[15]  Jerrold R. Turner,et al.  Intestinal mucosal barrier function in health and disease , 2009, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[16]  Huan Meng,et al.  Two-wave nanotherapy to target the stroma and optimize gemcitabine delivery to a human pancreatic cancer model in mice. , 2013, ACS nano.

[17]  Meiying Wang,et al.  Use of a pro-fibrogenic mechanism-based predictive toxicological approach for tiered testing and decision analysis of carbonaceous nanomaterials. , 2015, ACS nano.

[18]  Ilkka Paatero,et al.  Analyses in zebrafish embryos reveal that nanotoxicity profiles are dependent on surface-functionalization controlled penetrance of biological membranes , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[19]  Marianne Geiser,et al.  Deposition and biokinetics of inhaled nanoparticles , 2010, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[20]  Jinhong Jiang,et al.  Tumor-penetrating peptide enhances transcytosis of silicasome-based chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer , 2017, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[21]  W. Kreyling,et al.  Translocation of Inhaled Ultrafine Particles to the Brain , 2004, Inhalation toxicology.

[22]  J. Didziapetriene,et al.  Transport of nanoparticles through the placental barrier. , 2011, The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine.

[23]  A. Nel,et al.  Major effect of transcytosis on nano drug delivery to pancreatic cancer , 2017, Molecular & cellular oncology.

[24]  G. Nordberg,et al.  The effects of nanoparticles on the renal system , 2016, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[25]  Feng Zhao,et al.  Nanosurface chemistry and dose govern the bioaccumulation and toxicity of carbon nanotubes, metal nanomaterials and quantum dots in vivo , 2015 .

[26]  Mark E. Davis,et al.  Transcytosis and brain uptake of transferrin-containing nanoparticles by tuning avidity to transferrin receptor , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  J. Szmydynger-Chodobska,et al.  Blood–Brain Barrier Pathophysiology in Traumatic Brain Injury , 2011, Translational Stroke Research.

[28]  H. Maeda,et al.  Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review. , 2000, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[29]  A. Nel,et al.  Correction to Use of a Lipid-Coated Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticle Platform for Synergistic Gemcitabine and Paclitaxel Delivery to Human Pancreatic Cancer in Mice , 2016, ACS nano.

[30]  A. J. Tavares,et al.  Analysis of nanoparticle delivery to tumours , 2016 .

[31]  W. Pardridge,et al.  Human blood-brain barrier transferrin receptor. , 1987, Metabolism: clinical and experimental.

[32]  Chunying Chen,et al.  Fast intracellular dissolution and persistent cellular uptake of silver nanoparticles in CHO-K1 cells: implication for cytotoxicity , 2015, Nanotoxicology.

[33]  C. Tortiglione The heritable effects of nanotoxicity. , 2014, Nanomedicine.

[34]  B. Rutt,et al.  Enhanced cell uptake of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles functionalized with dendritic guanidines. , 2008, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[35]  Miles A. Miller,et al.  Prediction of Anti-cancer Nanotherapy Efficacy by Imaging , 2017, Nanotheranostics.

[36]  C. Jeffrey Brinker,et al.  Surface Interactions with Compartmentalized Cellular Phosphates Explain Rare Earth Oxide Nanoparticle Hazard and Provide Opportunities for Safer Design , 2014, ACS nano.

[37]  Bengt Fadeel,et al.  Interactions of engineered nanoparticles with organs protected by internal biological barriers. , 2013, Small.

[38]  J. M. Harris,et al.  Effect of pegylation on pharmaceuticals , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[39]  Feng Zhao,et al.  Ultrahigh reactivity provokes nanotoxicity: explanation of oral toxicity of nano-copper particles. , 2007, Toxicology letters.

[40]  Jingyuan Li,et al.  Revealing the binding structure of the protein corona on gold nanorods using synchrotron radiation-based techniques: understanding the reduced damage in cell membranes. , 2013, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[41]  Mauro Ferrari,et al.  Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[42]  Francesco Stellacci,et al.  Effect of surface properties on nanoparticle-cell interactions. , 2010, Small.

[43]  Michael Torrice,et al.  Does Nanomedicine Have a Delivery Problem? , 2016, ACS central science.

[44]  Zongxi Li,et al.  Aspect ratio determines the quantity of mesoporous silica nanoparticle uptake by a small GTPase-dependent macropinocytosis mechanism. , 2011, ACS nano.

[45]  K. Dawson,et al.  Designing the future of nanomedicine: current barriers to targeted brain therapeutics , 2014 .

[46]  Manuela Semmler-Behnke,et al.  Air-blood barrier translocation of tracheally instilled gold nanoparticles inversely depends on particle size. , 2014, ACS nano.

[47]  Huan Meng,et al.  Targeted drug delivery using iRGD peptide for solid cancer treatment. , 2017, Molecular systems design & engineering.

[48]  Feng Zhao,et al.  Bio-distribution and metabolic paths of silica coated CdSeS quantum dots. , 2008, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[49]  Derek S. Chan,et al.  Hyaluronan impairs vascular function and drug delivery in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer , 2012, Gut.

[50]  Saji George,et al.  A predictive toxicological paradigm for the safety assessment of nanomaterials. , 2009, ACS nano.

[51]  Carlos Cuevas,et al.  Enzymatic targeting of the stroma ablates physical barriers to treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. , 2012, Cancer cell.

[52]  W. Banks,et al.  Selective, Physiological Transport of Insulin Across the Blood-Brain Barrier: Novel Demonstration by Species-Specific Radioimmunoassays , 1997, Peptides.

[53]  Rakesh K. Jain,et al.  Angiotensin inhibition enhances drug delivery and potentiates chemotherapy by decompressing tumour blood vessels , 2013, Nature Communications.

[54]  Eric Pridgen,et al.  Factors Affecting the Clearance and Biodistribution of Polymeric Nanoparticles , 2008, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[55]  Yuexian Liu,et al.  The influence on cell cycle and cell division by various cadmium-containing quantum dots. , 2013, Small.

[56]  Yuhua Wang,et al.  Lipid-coated Cisplatin nanoparticles induce neighboring effect and exhibit enhanced anticancer efficacy. , 2013, ACS nano.

[57]  Aditi Jain,et al.  Nanomaterials in food and agriculture: An overview on their safety concerns and regulatory issues , 2018, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[58]  D. Tuveson,et al.  nab-Paclitaxel potentiates gemcitabine activity by reducing cytidine deaminase levels in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer. , 2012, Cancer discovery.

[59]  Arezou A Ghazani,et al.  Determining the size and shape dependence of gold nanoparticle uptake into mammalian cells. , 2006, Nano letters.

[60]  P. Dijke,et al.  Extracellular control of TGFβ signalling in vascular development and disease , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[61]  H. Maeda,et al.  A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs. , 1986, Cancer research.

[62]  T. Shibamoto,et al.  Effect of nanoparticles on the male reproductive system of mice. , 2009, International journal of andrology.

[63]  R. Jain,et al.  TGF-β blockade improves the distribution and efficacy of therapeutics in breast carcinoma by normalizing the tumor stroma , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  L. Mädler,et al.  Flame spray pyrolysis: An enabling technology for nanoparticles design and fabrication. , 2010, Nanoscale.

[65]  Changren Zhou,et al.  Polysaccharides-based nanoparticles as drug delivery systems. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[66]  Mauro Ferrari,et al.  An injectable nanoparticle generator enhances delivery of cancer therapeutics , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[67]  Mark E. Davis,et al.  Cancer Nanotechnology Plan 2015 , 2015 .

[68]  Siqingaowa Suo,et al.  Inhibitory effect of silver nanomaterials on transmissible virus-induced host cell infections , 2014, Biomaterials.

[69]  R. Korsmeyer,et al.  Critical questions in development of targeted nanoparticle therapeutics , 2016, Regenerative biomaterials.

[70]  T. Xia,et al.  Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. , 2009, Nature materials.

[71]  Jun Fang,et al.  The EPR effect: Unique features of tumor blood vessels for drug delivery, factors involved, and limitations and augmentation of the effect. , 2011, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[72]  Lutz Mädler,et al.  Decreased dissolution of ZnO by iron doping yields nanoparticles with reduced toxicity in the rodent lung and zebrafish embryos. , 2011, ACS nano.

[73]  Tian Xia,et al.  Processing pathway dependence of amorphous silica nanoparticle toxicity: colloidal vs pyrolytic. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[74]  Meiying Wang,et al.  Enhancing the imaging and biosafety of upconversion nanoparticles through phosphonate coating. , 2015, ACS nano.

[75]  R. C. Silva,et al.  In vitro exposure of bull sperm cells to DMSA-coated maghemite nanoparticles does not affect cell functionality or structure , 2018, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[76]  W. Kreyling,et al.  Differences in the biokinetics of inhaled nano- versus micrometer-sized particles. , 2013, Accounts of chemical research.

[77]  W. Pardridge,et al.  Blood-brain barrier transport of cationized immunoglobulin G: enhanced delivery compared to native protein. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[78]  H. Maeda The enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect in tumor vasculature: the key role of tumor-selective macromolecular drug targeting. , 2001, Advances in enzyme regulation.

[79]  Marc Schneider,et al.  Nanoparticles and their interactions with the dermal barrier , 2009, Dermato-endocrinology.

[80]  S M Moghimi,et al.  Long-circulating and target-specific nanoparticles: theory to practice. , 2001, Pharmacological reviews.

[81]  Wei Chen,et al.  Facet Energy and Reactivity versus Cytotoxicity: The Surprising Behavior of CdS Nanorods. , 2016, Nano letters.

[82]  M. Saunders,et al.  The toxicity, transport and uptake of nanoparticles in the in vitro BeWo b30 placental cell barrier model used within NanoTEST , 2015, Nanotoxicology.

[83]  J. Powell,et al.  Origin and fate of dietary nanoparticles and microparticles in the gastrointestinal tract. , 2010, Journal of autoimmunity.

[84]  Andrew Emili,et al.  Protein corona fingerprinting predicts the cellular interaction of gold and silver nanoparticles. , 2014, ACS nano.

[85]  Dennis E Discher,et al.  Minimal " Self " Peptides That Inhibit Phagocytic Clearance and Enhance Delivery of Nanoparticles References and Notes , 2022 .

[86]  Xiang Wang,et al.  Nanomaterial toxicity testing in the 21st century: use of a predictive toxicological approach and high-throughput screening. , 2013, Accounts of chemical research.

[87]  J. H. Park,et al.  Polysaccharide-based nanoparticles for theranostic nanomedicine. , 2016, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[88]  Scott E. McNeil,et al.  Evaluation of nanomedicines: stick to the basics , 2016, Nature Reviews Materials.

[89]  Lutz Mädler,et al.  PdO Doping Tunes Band-Gap Energy Levels as Well as Oxidative Stress Responses to a Co3O4p-Type Semiconductor in Cells and the Lung , 2014, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[90]  Viroj Wiwanitkit,et al.  Effect of gold nanoparticles on spermatozoa: the first world report. , 2009, Fertility and sterility.

[91]  R. Zhou,et al.  Binding of blood proteins to carbon nanotubes reduces cytotoxicity , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[92]  David Allard,et al.  Inhibition of Hedgehog Signaling Enhances Delivery of Chemotherapy in a Mouse Model of Pancreatic Cancer , 2009, Science.

[93]  Tianjiao Ji,et al.  Using Functional Nanomaterials to Target and Regulate the Tumor Microenvironment: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications , 2013, Advanced materials.

[94]  J. Cryan,et al.  Nanoparticles and the Blood-Brain Barrier: Advancing from In-Vitro Models Towards Therapeutic Significance , 2014, Pharmaceutical Research.

[95]  D D Allen,et al.  Nanoparticle Technology for Drug Delivery Across the Blood-Brain Barrier , 2002, Drug development and industrial pharmacy.

[96]  Kenneth A. Dawson,et al.  Nanoparticle size and surface properties determine the protein corona with possible implications for biological impacts , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[97]  M. Kruszewski,et al.  Proteomic approach to nanotoxicity. , 2016, Journal of proteomics.

[98]  Harald Sontheimer,et al.  Disruption of astrocyte-vascular coupling and the blood-brain barrier by invading glioma cells , 2014, Nature Communications.

[99]  Meiying Wang,et al.  Aspect ratio plays a role in the hazard potential of CeO2 nanoparticles in mouse lung and zebrafish gastrointestinal tract. , 2014, ACS nano.

[100]  A. Nel,et al.  Nano-enabled pancreas cancer immunotherapy using immunogenic cell death and reversing immunosuppression , 2017, Nature Communications.

[101]  Kazunori Kataoka,et al.  Improvement of cancer-targeting therapy, using nanocarriers for intractable solid tumors by inhibition of TGF-β signaling , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[102]  Younan Xia,et al.  The effect of sedimentation and diffusion on cellular uptake of gold nanoparticles. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[103]  J. Powell,et al.  Fine and ultrafine particles of the diet: influence on the mucosal immune response and association with Crohn’s disease , 2002, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

[104]  Kenneth A. Dawson,et al.  The interaction between nanoparticles and biological barriers , 2014 .

[105]  Lutz Mädler,et al.  Safe-by-Design CuO Nanoparticles via Fe-Doping, Cu-O Bond Length Variation, and Biological Assessment in Cells and Zebrafish Embryos. , 2017, ACS nano.

[106]  J. Kreuter Transport of Drugs Across the Blood-Brain Barrier by Nanoparticles , 2002 .

[107]  Xing-jie Liang,et al.  Gold nanoparticles cause size-dependent inhibition of embryonic development during murine pregnancy , 2018, Nano Research.

[108]  Robert Rallo,et al.  Differential expression of syndecan-1 mediates cationic nanoparticle toxicity in undifferentiated versus differentiated normal human bronchial epithelial cells. , 2011, ACS nano.

[109]  D. Franck,et al.  Evaluation of Functionalized Polysaccharide Microparticles Dosimetry for SPECT Imaging Based on Biodistribution Data of Rats , 2015, Molecular Imaging and Biology.