Oral Misoprostol Before Office Endometrial Biopsy

OBJECTIVE To evaluate oral misoprostol use before office endometrial biopsy. METHODS Forty‐two nonpregnant women aged 35–77 years were randomized to a prospective, double‐blind study to receive either 400 μg oral misoprostol or placebo 3 hours before office endometrial biopsy. Misoprostol effects were assessed by 1) cervical resistance, 2) ease of performing the endometrial biopsy, 3) success rate of obtaining an endometrial biopsy, 4) pain intensity associated with the endometrial biopsy, and 5) adverse clinical side effects. RESULTS Patients in the misoprostol group experienced significantly (P < .01) more pain associated with the endometrial biopsy. The observed power to detect this difference in misoprostol‐placebo comparison using the Wilcoxon rank sum test at 0.05 level of significance is 89%. In addition, significantly (P < .05) more patients had the adverse side effect of uterine cramping at 1.5 hours after medication ingestion in the misoprostol group. The observed power to detect this difference is 98%. There were no differences between the misoprostol and placebo groups in cervical resistance, ease of performing the biopsy, success rate for obtaining an endometrial biopsy, or adverse side effects at 3 hours post medication ingestion. CONCLUSION Oral misoprostol 400 μg caused more uterine cramping and pain in nonpregnant women undergoing office endometrial biopsy when given 3 hours before biopsy attempt. No other cervical effects were noted.

[1]  P. Darney,et al.  Misoprostol and pregnancy. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  J. Tyson,et al.  Early Medical Abortion With Methotrexate and Misoprostol , 2001, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  S. Preutthipan,et al.  Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Priming Before Operative Hysteroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2000, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  R. Gherman,et al.  Outpatient Cervical Ripening With Intravaginal Misoprostol , 2000, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  A. Kaunitz,et al.  Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review of the literature. , 2000, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  M. Geary,et al.  The misoprostol third stage of labour study: a randomised controlled comparison between orally administered misoprostol and standard management , 2000, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[7]  K. Matthews,et al.  A double‐blind placebo controlled randomised trial of misoprostol and oxytocin in the management of the third stage of labour , 2000, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[8]  A. Autry,et al.  Medical management of non‐viable early first trimester pregnancy , 1999, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[9]  A. Sperling A randomized controlled trial of laminaria, oral misoprostol, and vaginal misoprostol before abortion. , 1999, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  P. Ho,et al.  The use of misoprostol for pre-operative cervical dilatation prior to vacuum aspiration: a randomized trial. , 1999, Human reproduction.

[11]  Kuldip Singh,et al.  Vaginal misoprostol for pre‐abortion cervical priming: is there an optimal evacuation time interval? , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[12]  S. Preutthipan,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before hysteroscopy. , 1999, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  J. Weeks,et al.  Oral or Vaginal Misoprostol Administration for Induction of Labor: A Randomized, Double‐Blind Trial , 1998, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  P. Ho,et al.  Oral misoprostol for cervical priming in non-pregnant women. , 1997, Human reproduction.

[15]  S. Pinion,et al.  The effects of the gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogue (goserelin) and prostaglandin E1 (misoprostol) on cervical resistance prior to transcervical resection of the endometrium , 1996, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[16]  P. Ho,et al.  Oral misoprostol versus placebo for cervical dilatation before vacuum aspiration in first trimester pregnancy. , 1995, Human reproduction.

[17]  J. Holland,et al.  The memorial pain assessment card. A valid instrument for the evaluation of cancer pain , 1987, Cancer.

[18]  S. Sturgis [Comprehensive gynecology]. , 1955, Obstetricia y ginecologia latino-americanas.