Formalisms for multi-agent systems

As computer scientists, our goals are motivated by the desire to improve computer systems in some way: making them easier to design and implement, more robust and less prone to error, easier to use, faster, cheaper, and so on. In the field of multi-agent systems, our goal is to build systems capable of flexible autonomous decision making, with societies of such systems cooperating with one-another. There is a lot of formal theory in the area but it is often not obvious what such theories should represent and what role the theory is intended to play. Theories of agents are often abstract and obtuse and not related to concrete computational models.

[1]  Joseph Y. Halpern,et al.  A Guide to Completeness and Complexity for Modal Logics of Knowledge and Belief , 1992, Artif. Intell..

[2]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  The imperative future: principles of executable temporal logic , 1996 .

[3]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  Fibred semantics and the weaving of logics. Part 1: Modal and intuitionistic logics , 1996, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[4]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Towards formal methods for agent-based systems , 1996, FME 1996.

[5]  Michael Jackson,et al.  Where Do Operations Come From: A Multiparadigm Specification Technique , 1996, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[6]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  Intention is Choice with Commitment , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[7]  Anand S. Rao,et al.  Modeling Rational Agents within a BDI-Architecture , 1997, KR.

[8]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  On the Formal Specification and Verification of Multi-Agent Systems , 1997, Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst..

[9]  M. de Rijke,et al.  Why Combine Logics? , 1997, Stud Logica.

[10]  Michael Fisher,et al.  An introduction to executable temporal logics , 1996, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[11]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  A Resolution-Based Proof Method for Temporal Logics of Knowledge and Belief , 1996, FAPR.

[12]  Marcus Kracht,et al.  Properties of independently axiomatizable bimodal logics , 1991, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[13]  Nathan Griffiths,et al.  From Agent Theory to Agent Construction: A Case Study , 1996, ATAL.

[14]  J. Armstrong Knowledge and Belief , 1953 .

[15]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Coherent Social Action , 1994, ECAI.

[16]  Ronald Fagin,et al.  Reasoning about knowledge , 1995 .

[17]  Michael Luck,et al.  A Formal Framework for Agency and Autonomy , 1995, ICMAS.

[18]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  Adding a temporal dimension to a logic , 1992 .

[19]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Knowledge, Belief and Time , 1986, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[20]  Michael Luck,et al.  Understanding Autonomous Interaction , 1996, ECAI.

[21]  Michael Luck,et al.  Distributed Artificial Intelligence Architecture and Modelling: Proceedings of the First Australian Workshop on Distributed Artificial Intelligence , 1996 .

[22]  Michael Luck,et al.  Formalising the Contract Net as a Goal-Directed System , 1996, MAAMAW.

[23]  Michael Luck,et al.  Engagement and Cooperating in Motivated Agent Modelling , 1995, DAI.