Useful lifetime tracking via the IMM

Inference of the expected time-to-failure is made difficult by the need to track and predict the trajectories of real-valued system parameters over essentially unbounded domains, and by the need to identify a subset of these domains that refers to a state of unsafe operation. In a previous paper we proposed a novel technique whereby these problems are avoided: instead of physical system or sensor parameters, sensor-level test-failure probability vectors (bounded within the unit hypercube) are tracked; and via a close relationship with the TEAMS suite of modeling tools, the terminal states for all such vectors can be enumerated. In that paper a full-dimension Kalman filter and IMM (interacting multiple model) tracking solution was proposed, but results were preliminary. In this paper we continue, modify, and provide reasonably convincing results.

[1]  Thiagalingam Kirubarajan,et al.  Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation , 2001 .

[2]  Thiagalingam Kirubarajan,et al.  Statistical approach to prognostics , 2001, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[3]  M. S. Lebold,et al.  Hybrid reasoning for prognostic learning in CBM systems , 2001, 2001 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8542).

[4]  D. C. Swanson,et al.  A general prognostic tracking algorithm for predictive maintenance , 2001, 2001 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8542).

[5]  C. B. Board Stress wave analysis of turbine engine faults , 2000, 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8484).

[6]  Michael J. Roemer,et al.  Advanced diagnostics and prognostics for gas turbine engine risk assessment , 2000, 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8484).

[7]  Stephen J. Engel,et al.  Prognostics, the real issues involved with predicting life remaining , 2000, 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8484).