Differential superior prefrontal activity on initial versus subsequent shifts in naive subjects

Flexible adaptation to changing environments requires shifting of a cognitive set, one basic function of the prefrontal cortex. Set shifting, as instantiated in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST) administered in a neuropsychological testing room, is typically achieved when subjects have no prior experiences of updating one WCST behavior to another. By contrast, earlier neuroimaging studies typically involved examination of repeated transitions between particular behaviors, to which situation subjects are far from naive. Naive subjects with no prior knowledge of the WCST were recruited in the present functional magnetic resonance imaging study to test set shifting under unknown situations that they experienced for the first time. Prominent activation was revealed in the left superior prefrontal cortex selectively on the initial shifts. On the other hand, the inferior prefrontal cortex was significantly activated on both the initial and subsequent shifts. The superior prefrontal activation distinguishable from the conventional inferior prefrontal activation suggests a selective role of this region in performance of the WCST in naive subjects.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[2]  E. Crone,et al.  Brain Regions Mediating Flexible Rule Use during Development , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The role of prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex in task switching. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry in human lateral prefrontal cortex during cognitive set shifting , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  T. Robbins,et al.  Contrasting mechanisms of impaired attentional set-shifting in patients with frontal lobe damage or Parkinson's disease. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Perseverative interference in monkeys following selective lesions of the inferior prefrontal convexity , 1970, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  D. A. Grant,et al.  A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problem. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  A P Shimamura,et al.  Cognitive impairment following frontal lobe damage and its relevance to human amnesia. , 1989, Behavioral neuroscience.

[9]  T. Robbins,et al.  Dissociation in prefrontal cortex of affective and attentional shifts , 1996, Nature.

[10]  T. Robbins,et al.  Differential Responses in Human Striatum and Prefrontal Cortex to Changes in Object and Rule Relevance , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Charles M. Butter,et al.  Perseveration in extinction and in discrimination reversal tasks following selective frontal ablations in Macaca mulatta , 1969 .

[12]  J. Duncan,et al.  Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[13]  A. Dove,et al.  Prefrontal cortex activation in task switching: an event-related fMRI study. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[14]  T. Robbins,et al.  Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  E. Stein,et al.  Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Koji Jimura,et al.  Activation of Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus during Response Inhibition across Response Modalities , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  A. Owen,et al.  Fractionating attentional control using event-related fMRI. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Transient and sustained activity in a distributed neural system for human working memory , 1997, Nature.

[19]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Predicting Success: Patterns of Cortical Activation and Deactivation Prior to Response Inhibition , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  A. Dale,et al.  Functional-Anatomic Correlates of Object Priming in Humans Revealed by Rapid Presentation Event-Related fMRI , 1998, Neuron.

[21]  John W. Harwell,et al.  Surface-Based Atlases and a Database of Cortical Structure and Function , 2003 .

[22]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  An area specialized for spatial working memory in human frontal cortex. , 1998, Science.

[23]  M. Petrides,et al.  Differential activation of the human orbital, mid-ventrolateral, and mid-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during the processing of visual stimuli , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  B. J. Casey,et al.  The Effect of Preceding Context on Inhibition: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[25]  R. Passingham,et al.  Ventral Prefrontal Cortex Is Not Essential for Working Memory , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  T. Robbins,et al.  Dissociable Forms of Inhibitory Control within Prefrontal Cortex with an Analog of the Wisconsin Card Sort Test: Restriction to Novel Situations and Independence from “On-Line” Processing , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Transient Activation of Superior Prefrontal Cortex during Inhibition of Cognitive Set , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  R. Passingham,et al.  The prefrontal cortex: response selection or maintenance within working memory? , 2000, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[29]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Common inhibitory mechanism in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event-related functional MRI. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  Marcel Brass,et al.  Selection for Cognitive Control: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study on the Selection of Task-Relevant Information , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  S. Petersen,et al.  Characterizing the Hemodynamic Response: Effects of Presentation Rate, Sampling Procedure, and the Possibility of Ordering Brain Activity Based on Relative Timing , 2000, NeuroImage.

[32]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The neural basis of the central executive system of working memory , 1995, Nature.

[33]  Koji Jimura,et al.  On Verbal/Nonverbal Modality Dependence of Left and Right Inferior Prefrontal Activation during Performance of Flanker Interference Task , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  J. Changeux,et al.  The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: theoretical analysis and modeling in a neuronal network. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  Benjamin A. Parris,et al.  The role of the ventrolateral frontal cortex in inhibitory oculomotor control. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[36]  S. Koslow,et al.  Databasing the brain : from data to knowledge (neuroinformatics) , 2005 .

[37]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task , 1997, Nature.

[38]  R. Passingham,et al.  Non-reversal shifts after selective prefrontal ablations in monkeys (Macaca mulatta). , 1972, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Functional activation of the human frontal cortex during the performance of verbal working memory tasks. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  M. Petrides,et al.  Neural Bases of Set-Shifting Deficits in Parkinson's Disease , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  H. Nelson A Modified Card Sorting Test Sensitive to Frontal Lobe Defects , 1976, Cortex.

[42]  R. Constable,et al.  Imaging Response Inhibition in a Stop-Signal Task: Neural Correlates Independent of Signal Monitoring and Post-Response Processing , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Transient activation of inferior prefrontal cortex during cognitive set shifting , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  M. Petrides,et al.  Wisconsin Card Sorting Revisited: Distinct Neural Circuits Participating in Different Stages of the Task Identified by Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  J. Gabrieli,et al.  Immature Frontal Lobe Contributions to Cognitive Control in Children Evidence from fMRI , 2002, Neuron.

[46]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[47]  Morten L Kringelbach,et al.  Neural correlates of rapid reversal learning in a simple model of human social interaction , 2003, NeuroImage.

[48]  B. Milner Effects of Different Brain Lesions on Card Sorting: The Role of the Frontal Lobes , 1963 .

[49]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Cortical and Subcortical Contributions to Stop Signal Response Inhibition: Role of the Subthalamic Nucleus , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Mapping Motor Inhibition: Conjunctive Brain Activations across Different Versions of Go/No-Go and Stop Tasks , 2001, NeuroImage.

[51]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Using fMRI to decompose the neural processes underlying the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test , 2006, NeuroImage.

[52]  R. Buckner,et al.  Transient Activation during Block Transition , 2001, NeuroImage.

[53]  Koji Jimura,et al.  Neural mechanism in anterior prefrontal cortex for inhibition of prolonged set interference. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  H. Leung,et al.  Common and Differential Ventrolateral Prefrontal Activity during Inhibition of Hand and Eye Movements , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  Jeremy R. Reynolds,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Transient and Sustained Cognitive Control during Task Switching , 2003, Neuron.

[56]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of human prefrontal cortex activation during a spatial working memory task. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  N. Butters,et al.  Behavioral effects of sequential and one-stage ablations of orbital prefrontal cortex in the monkey. , 1973, Experimental neurology.