Development of Probabilistic Dam Breach Model Using Bayesian Inference

Dam breach models are commonly used to predict outflow hydrographs of potentially failing dams and are key ingredients for evaluating flood risk. In this paper a new dam breach modeling framework is introduced that shall improve the reliability of hydrograph predictions of homogeneous earthen embankment dams. Striving for a small number of parameters, the simplified physics-based model describes the processes of failing embankment dams by breach enlargement, driven by progressive surface erosion. Therein the erosion rate of dam material is modeled by empirical sediment transport formulations. Embedding the model into a Bayesian multilevel framework allows for quantitative analysis of different categories of uncertainties. To this end, data available in literature of observed peak discharge and final breach width of historical dam failures was used to perform model inversion by applying Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation. Prior knowledge is mainly based on non-informative distribution functions. The resulting posterior distribution shows that the main source of uncertainty is a correlated subset of parameters, consisting of the residual error term and the epistemic term quantifying the breach erosion rate. The prediction intervals of peak discharge and final breach width are congruent with values known from literature. To finally predict the outflow hydrograph for real case applications, an alternative residual model was formulated that assumes perfect data and a perfect model. The fully probabilistic fashion of hydrograph prediction has the potential to improve the adequate risk management of downstream flooding.

[1]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 2003, Springer Series in Statistics.

[2]  T. Wahl,et al.  Prediction of Embankment Dam Breach Parameters A Literature Review and Needs Assessment DSO-98-004 Dam Safety , 2000 .

[3]  Panos G. Georgopoulos,et al.  Uncertainty reduction and characterization for complex environmental fate and transport models: An empirical Bayesian framework incorporating the stochastic response surface method , 2003 .

[4]  Marco Pilotti,et al.  Simplified Method for the Characterization of the Hydrograph following a Sudden Partial Dam Break , 2010 .

[5]  P. J. Green,et al.  Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis , 1987 .

[6]  Mohamed Hassan,et al.  Improving the accuracy of breach modelling: why are we not progressing faster? , 2008 .

[7]  Ahmad Tahershamsi,et al.  Comparing the Performance of Neural Networks for Predicting Peak Outflow from Breached Embankments when Back Propagation Algorithms Meet Evolutionary Algorithms , 2013 .

[8]  Gihan R. Mudalige,et al.  Vectorizing unstructured mesh computations for many‐core architectures , 2016, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[9]  Somchai Wongwises,et al.  Embankment dam breach and its outflow characteristics , 2004 .

[10]  Willi H. Hager,et al.  Plane dike-breach due to overtopping: effects of sediment, dike height and discharge , 2012 .

[11]  H. Capart Analytical solutions for gradual dam breaching and downstream river flooding , 2013 .

[12]  W. Hager,et al.  Numerical embankment breach modelling including seepage flow effects , 2017 .

[13]  F. Macchione,et al.  Formulas for the Peak Discharge from Breached Earthfill Dams , 2014 .

[14]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian calibration of computer models , 2001 .

[15]  Xudong Fu,et al.  Real time prediction approach for floods caused by failure of natural dams due to overtopping , 2012 .

[16]  Ming Ye,et al.  Assessment of parametric uncertainty for groundwater reactive transport modeling , 2014 .

[17]  R. Fell,et al.  The statistics of embankment dam failures and accidents , 2000 .

[18]  Jenný Brynjarsdóttir,et al.  Learning about physical parameters: the importance of model discrepancy , 2014 .

[19]  David C. Froehlich,et al.  Predicting Peak Discharge from Gradually Breached Embankment Dam , 2016 .

[20]  Dongbin Xiu,et al.  The Wiener-Askey Polynomial Chaos for Stochastic Differential Equations , 2002, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[21]  Bayesian updating of parameters for a sediment entrainment model via Markov chain Monte Carlo. , 2009 .

[22]  Peter Freeman,et al.  Application of artificial intelligence , 1988, SOEN.

[23]  F. Pappenberger,et al.  Ignorance is bliss: Or seven reasons not to use uncertainty analysis , 2006 .

[24]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Flood-plain mapping: a critical discussion of deterministic and probabilistic approaches , 2010 .

[25]  D. Higdon,et al.  Accelerating Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation by Differential Evolution with Self-Adaptive Randomized Subspace Sampling , 2009 .

[26]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Bayesian Multilevel Model Calibration for Inverse Problems Under Uncertainty with Perfect Data , 2015, J. Aerosp. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Samuel J. Peter Dam Break Analysis under Uncertainty , 2017 .

[28]  Tony L. Wahl,et al.  Uncertainty of predictions of embankment dam breach parameters , 2004 .

[29]  T. Thorarinsdottir,et al.  Propagation of rating curve uncertainty in design flood estimation , 2016 .

[30]  Christian Volz,et al.  Numerical simulation of embankment breaching due to overtopping , 2013 .

[31]  Francesco Macchione,et al.  Model for Predicting Floods due to Earthen Dam Breaching. II: Comparison with Other Methods and Predictive Use , 2008 .

[32]  David C. Froehlich,et al.  Embankment Dam Breach Parameters and Their Uncertainties , 2008 .

[33]  W. Nowak,et al.  Model selection on solid ground: Rigorous comparison of nine ways to evaluate Bayesian model evidence , 2014, Water resources research.

[34]  George Kuczera,et al.  Critical evaluation of parameter consistency and predictive uncertainty in hydrological modeling: A case study using Bayesian total error analysis , 2009 .

[35]  J. Godt,et al.  Controls on the breach geometry and flood hydrograph during overtopping of noncohesive earthen dams , 2015 .

[36]  Pierre-Jacques Frank Hydraulics of spatial dike breaches , 2016 .

[37]  G. di Baldassarre,et al.  Probabilistic Flood Maps to support decision‐making: Mapping the Value of Information , 2016 .

[38]  Antje Winkel Dam Breach Modeling Technology , 2016 .

[39]  Nicholas J. Schnitter,et al.  A history of dams : the useful pyramids , 1995 .

[40]  David Vetsch,et al.  Methode zur Beurteilung des maximalen Breschenabflusses bei progressivem Bruch homogener Erdschüttdämme an kleinen Stauhaltungen , 2015 .

[41]  B. Merz,et al.  Flood-risk mapping: contributions towards an enhanced assessment of extreme events and associated risks , 2006 .

[42]  Weiming Wu,et al.  Earthen embankment breaching , 2011 .

[43]  B. Sudret,et al.  A unified framework for multilevel uncertainty quantification in Bayesian inverse problems , 2016 .

[44]  Volker Weitbrecht,et al.  Breaching of overtopped river embankments controlled by apparent cohesion , 2011 .

[45]  N Oreskes,et al.  Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences , 1994, Science.

[46]  J. Hintze,et al.  Violin plots : A box plot-density trace synergism , 1998 .

[47]  Ebrahim Ahmadisharaf,et al.  A probabilistic framework for comparison of dam breach parameters and outflow hydrograph generated by different empirical prediction methods , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[48]  Li Min Zhang,et al.  Dam Breach Modeling , 2016 .

[49]  Steven J. Burian,et al.  Assessment of GPU computational enhancement to a 2D flood model , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[50]  David Hinkley,et al.  Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife , 2008 .

[51]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations , 1998 .

[52]  Michel Lang,et al.  Bayesian analysis of stage‐fall‐discharge rating curves and their uncertainties , 2016 .

[53]  Roland Faeh,et al.  Numerical Modeling of Breach Erosion of River Embankments , 2007 .

[54]  Javier Murillo,et al.  An optimized GPU implementation of a 2D free surface simulation model on unstructured meshes , 2014, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[55]  Zhengang Wang,et al.  Three-dimensional non-cohesive earthen dam breach model. Part 1: Theory and methodology , 2006 .

[56]  Weiming Wu Computational River Dynamics , 2007 .

[57]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[58]  J. Rosenthal,et al.  Optimal scaling for various Metropolis-Hastings algorithms , 2001 .

[59]  Andrey Leonidovich Rozov,et al.  Modeling of washout of dams , 2003 .

[60]  J. Walder,et al.  Methods for predicting peak discharge of floods caused by failure of natural and constructed earthen dams , 1997 .

[61]  V. Singh,et al.  Analysis of Gradual Earth‐Dam Failure , 1988 .

[62]  Cajo J. F. ter Braak,et al.  A Markov Chain Monte Carlo version of the genetic algorithm Differential Evolution: easy Bayesian computing for real parameter spaces , 2006, Stat. Comput..

[63]  Hubert Chanson Overtopping Breaching of Noncohesive Homogeneous Embankments , 2004 .

[64]  M. Pirotton,et al.  Theoretical and numerical analysis of the influence of the bottom friction formulation in free surface flow modelling , 2011 .

[65]  Jasper A. Vrugt,et al.  High‐dimensional posterior exploration of hydrologic models using multiple‐try DREAM(ZS) and high‐performance computing , 2012 .

[66]  Francesco Macchione,et al.  Model for Predicting Floods due to Earthen Dam Breaching : I: Formulation and Evaluation , 2008 .

[67]  Ignacio Escuder-Bueno,et al.  Computational Aspects of Dam Risk Analysis: Findings and Challenges , 2016 .