Twitter Adoption and Activity in U.S. Legislatures: A 50-State Study

This study draws inspiration from the literature on Twitter adoption and activity in U.S. legislatures, applying predictions from those limited studies to all 7,378 politicians serving across 50 American state legislatures in the fall of 2015. Tests of bivariate association carried out for individual states lead to widely varying results, indicating an underlying diversity of legislative environments. However, a pooled multivariate analysis for all 50 states indicates that constituents per legislator, the youth and educational attainment of a district, legislative professionalism, being a woman, sitting in the upper chamber, leadership, and legislative inexperience are significantly and positively associated with Twitter adoption and current Twitter use. Controlling for these factors, neither legislator party, nor majority status, nor partisan instability, nor district income is significantly related to either Twitter adoption or current Twitter use. Although women are more likely than men to adopt and use Twitter, the most active users narrowly tend to be men. Finally, most variation in social media adoption and activity by legislators remains unexplained, leaving considerable room for further theoretical development.

[1]  Jeff Gulati,et al.  Communicating with Constituents in 140 Characters or Less: Twitter and the Diffusion of Technology Innovation in the United States Congress , 2010 .

[2]  B. Reingold,et al.  Legislative Leadership and Intersections of Gender, Race, and Ethnicity in the American States , 2014 .

[3]  R. Peterson To tweet or not to tweet: Exploring the determinants of early adoption of Twitter by House members in the 111th Congress , 2012 .

[4]  Mona Lena Krook,et al.  Critical Mass Theory and Women's Political Representation , 2008 .

[5]  N. Yang,et al.  Twitter Adoption in Congress , 2010 .

[6]  David R. Mayhew Divided we govern : party control, lawmaking, and investigations, 1946-1990 , 1992 .

[7]  P. Squire,et al.  Measuring State Legislative Professionalism: The Squire Index Revisited , 2007, State Politics & Policy Quarterly.

[8]  Heather K. Evans,et al.  Twitter Style: An Analysis of How House Candidates Used Twitter in Their 2012 Campaigns , 2014, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[9]  Maeve Duggan,et al.  Social Media Update 2016 , 2016 .

[10]  T. Lowi Toward Functionalism in Political Science: The Case of Innovation in Party Systems , 1963, American Political Science Review.

[11]  David S. Lassen,et al.  Twitter: The Electoral Connection? , 2011 .

[12]  Mingzhou Jin,et al.  Mode Selection for Automotive Distribution with Quantity Discounts , 2007 .

[13]  J. Golbeck,et al.  Twitter use by the U.S. Congress , 2010 .

[14]  T. Rex A practical guide to the American Community Survey (5-year estimates) , 2010 .

[15]  David Knoke,et al.  Networks of Elite Structure and Decision Making , 1993 .

[16]  Kevin M. Wagner,et al.  Tweeting to Power: The Social Media Revolution in American Politics , 2013 .

[17]  Jacob R. Straus,et al.  Social Networking and Constituent Communications: Member Use of Twitter During a Two-Month Period in the 111th Congress , 2010 .

[18]  Elisabeth S. Clemens and,et al.  POLITICS AND INSTITUTIONALISM: Explaining Durability and Change , 1999 .

[19]  J. Sala The Use of Electronic Technology and Legislative Representation in the Mexican and U.S. States , 2012 .

[20]  C. Williams,et al.  The Dissemination of Social Media to Campaigns for State Legislature: The 2012 New England Case , 2013 .