Defining the Value of Spine Care
暂无分享,去创建一个
D. Nash | T. Albert | S. Berven | C. Mick | S. Glassman | B. Currier | F. Phillips | A. Crockard | Todd R Allen | Jeffrey A Rihn
[1] G. Andersson,et al. Comparative Effectiveness Evidence From the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial: Surgical Versus Nonoperative Care for Spinal Stenosis, Degenerative Spondylolisthesis, and Intervertebral Disc Herniation , 2011, Spine.
[2] P. Anderson,et al. Predicting SF-6D Utility Scores From the Neck Disability Index and Numeric Rating Scales for Neck and Arm Pain , 2011, Spine.
[3] Jeffrey G Jarvik,et al. Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. , 2010, JAMA.
[4] J. Weinstein,et al. Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Does Fusion Method Influence Outcome? Four-Year Results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial , 2009, Spine.
[5] S. Berven,et al. Predicting SF-6D Utility Scores From the Oswestry Disability Index and Numeric Rating Scales for Back and Leg Pain , 2009, Spine.
[6] John R. Johnson,et al. RhBMP-2 Versus Iliac Crest Bone Graft for Lumbar Spine Fusion in Patients Over 60 Years of Age: A Cost-Utility Study , 2009, Spine.
[7] J. Cairns,et al. SF-6D versus EQ-5D: reasons for differences in utility scores and impact on reported cost-utility , 2009, The European Journal of Health Economics.
[8] G. Andersson,et al. Surgical treatment of spinal stenosis with and without degenerative spondylolisthesis: cost-effectiveness after 2 years. , 2008, Annals of internal medicine.
[9] H. Malchau,et al. Utility of Spine Surgery: A Comparison of Common Elective Orthopaedic Surgical Procedures , 2008, Spine.
[10] J. Weinstein,et al. Surgical Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Disc Herniation: Four-Year Results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) , 2008, Spine.
[11] S. Berven,et al. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. , 2008, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.
[12] M. Robinson,et al. Defining patient-centered, multidimensional success criteria for treatment of chronic spine pain. , 2008, Pain medicine.
[13] Graeme Hawthorne,et al. Deriving utility scores from the SF-36 health instrument using Rasch analysis , 2008, Quality of Life Research.
[14] John R. Johnson,et al. Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication. , 2009, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.
[15] S. Berven,et al. Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[16] Brett Hanscom,et al. The Cost Effectiveness of Surgical Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Disc Herniation Over Two Years: Evidence From the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) , 2008, Spine.
[17] Ronald Brand,et al. Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica from lumbar disc herniation: cost utility analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[18] Brett Hanscom,et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.
[19] R. Deyo,et al. Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. , 2008, JAMA.
[20] A. Greenwald,et al. The current state of cervical and lumbar spinal disc arthroplasty. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[21] A. Copay,et al. Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. , 2007, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.
[22] Brett Hanscom,et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.
[23] C. Shaffrey,et al. SF-36 PCS Benefit-Cost Ratio of Lumbar Fusion Comparison to Other Surgical Interventions: A Thought Experiment , 2007, Spine.
[24] C. Bünger,et al. Costs and effects in lumbar spinal fusion. A follow-up study in 136 consecutive patients with chronic low back pain , 2007, European Spine Journal.
[25] Alpesh A. Patel,et al. The 36‐Item Short Form , 2007, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
[26] James N Weinstein,et al. United States’ Trends and Regional Variations in Lumbar Spine Surgery: 1992–2003 , 2006, Spine.
[27] J. Hartvigsen,et al. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients , 2006, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.
[28] R. Gatchel,et al. A Cost-utility Analysis of Chronic Spinal Pain Treatment Outcomes: Converting SF-36 Data Into Quality-adjusted Life Years , 2006, The Clinical journal of pain.
[29] F. Sassi. Calculating QALYs, comparing QALY and DALY calculations. , 2006, Health policy and planning.
[30] J. Weinstein,et al. The Impact of Comorbidities on the Change in Short-Form 36 and Oswestry Scores Following Lumbar Spine Surgery , 2006, Spine.
[31] H. V. van Stel,et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes , 2006 .
[32] Anoushka Singh,et al. Quality of Life Assessment Using the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Questionnaire in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Comparison With SF-36 , 2006, Spine.
[33] Dan Greenberg,et al. Bias in published cost effectiveness studies: systematic review , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[34] S. Petrou,et al. An investigation into the empirical validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D based on hypothetical preferences in a general population. , 2005, Health economics.
[35] N. Arden,et al. Cost-effectiveness and safety of epidural steroids in the management of sciatica. , 2005, Health technology assessment.
[36] John E. Brazier,et al. Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D , 2005, Quality of Life Research.
[37] T. Solberg,et al. Health-related quality of life assessment by the EuroQol-5D can provide cost-utility data in the field of low-back surgery. , 2005, European Spine Journal.
[38] S. Piva,et al. Psychometric properties of the functional rating index in patients with low back pain , 2005, European Spine Journal.
[39] C Fraser,et al. Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. , 2005, Health technology assessment.
[40] Stephen Joel Coons,et al. US Valuation of the EQ-5D Health States: Development and Testing of the D1 Valuation Model , 2005, Medical care.
[41] T. Ganiats,et al. Comparison of Measured Utility Scores and Imputed Scores From the SF-36 in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2005, Medical care.
[42] N. Vøllestad,et al. Concurrent Comparison of Responsiveness in Pain and Functional Status Measurements Used for Patients With Low Back Pain , 2004, Spine.
[43] J. Brazier,et al. A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups. , 2004, Health economics.
[44] J. Fischgrund,et al. Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis With Spinal Stenosis: A Prospective Long-Term Study Comparing Fusion and Pseudarthrosis , 2004, Spine.
[45] David Andrew Walsh,et al. Performance Problems of Patients With Chronic Low-Back Pain and the Measurement of Patient-Centered Outcome , 2004, Spine.
[46] L. Prieto,et al. Problems and solutions in calculating quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) , 2003, Health and quality of life outcomes.
[47] John Brazier,et al. A view from the bridge: agreement between the SF-6D utility algorithm and the Health Utilities Index. , 2003, Health economics.
[48] D. Beaton,et al. Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life and Physical Function , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[49] R. Pietrobon,et al. Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Short Form 12-Item Survey (SF-12) in Patients With Back Pain , 2003, Spine.
[50] K. Tamai,et al. Association of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score With the Oswestry Disability Index, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and Short-Form 36 , 2003, Spine.
[51] Brett Hanscom,et al. Is a Condition-Specific Instrument for Patients with Low Back Pain/Leg Symptoms Really Necessary?: The Responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36 , 2003, Spine.
[52] Plamen Nikolov,et al. Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2002 , 2003, Diabetes care.
[53] A. Nordwall,et al. The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain , 2003, European Spine Journal.
[54] L. Göeken,et al. Concurrent Validity of Questionnaire and Performance-Based Disability Measurements in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain , 2002, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.
[55] J. Brazier,et al. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. , 2002, Journal of health economics.
[56] H R Rubin,et al. The advantages and disadvantages of process-based measures of health care quality. , 2001, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.
[57] J. Mant. Process versus outcome indicators in the assessment of quality of health care. , 2001, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.
[58] A. Nordwall,et al. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar Fusion Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial From the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group , 2001, Spine.
[59] A. Garratt,et al. Responsiveness of Generic and Specific Measures of Health Outcome in Low Back Pain , 2001, Spine.
[60] P. Pynsent,et al. The Oswestry Disability Index. , 2000, Spine.
[61] Michael E. Chernew,et al. Willingness to Pay for a Quality-adjusted Life Year , 2000, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[62] R. K. Snider,et al. Cost-effectiveness of fusion with and without instrumentation for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis. , 2000, Spine.
[63] M. Foy,et al. Responsiveness of common outcome measures for patients with low back pain. , 1999, Spine.
[64] J. Brazier,et al. Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[65] M. Mackay,et al. 1997 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis With Spinal Stenosis: A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Decompressive Laminectomy and Arthrodesis With and Without Spinal Instrumentation , 1997, Spine.
[66] D. Meier,et al. [Assessment of the quality of life]. , 1997, Therapeutische Umschau. Revue therapeutique.
[67] Robert A. Lew,et al. Lumbar Laminectomy Alone or With Instrumented or Noninstrumented Arthrodesis in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Patient Selection, Costs, and Surgical Outcomes , 1997, Spine.
[68] W F Lawrence,et al. Predicting Quality of Well-being Scores from the SF-36 , 1997, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[69] H. Herkowitz,et al. Spinal Instrumentation in the Management of Degenerative Disorders of the Lumbar Spine , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[70] Sidhu Ks,et al. Spinal instrumentation in the management of degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine. , 1997 .
[71] R. Leclaire,et al. A Cross‐sectional Study Comparing the Oswestry and Roland‐Morris Functional Disability Scales in Two Populations of Patients With Low Back Pain of Different Levels of Severity , 1997, Spine.
[72] M. Weinstein,et al. Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. , 1996, JAMA.
[73] D. Grob,et al. Predictors of Bad and Good Outcome of Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Prospective Clinical Study With 2 Years' Follow‐up , 1996, Spine.
[74] R. Deyo,et al. Cost‐Effectiveness of Lumbar Discectomy for the Treatment of Herniated Intervertebral Disc , 1996, Spine.
[75] J. Ware,et al. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. , 1996, Medical care.
[76] T. Ganiats,et al. Comparison of two methods of calculating Quality-adjusted Life Years , 1996, Quality of Life Research.
[77] M. Liang,et al. Relative responsiveness of condition-specific and generic health status measures in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[78] D. Singer,et al. Assessing Health‐Related Quality of Life in Patients With Sciatica , 1995, Spine.
[79] H C de Vet,et al. Measuring the Functional Status of Patients With Low Back Pain: Assessment of the Quality of Four Disease-Specific Questionnaires , 1995, Spine.
[80] R. Deyo,et al. Lumbar spinal fusion. A cohort study of complications, reoperations, and resource use in the Medicare population. , 1993, Spine.
[81] M. Abdalla,et al. The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? , 1993, BMJ.
[82] J. Haselkorn,et al. Patient outcomes after lumbar spinal fusions. , 1992, JAMA.
[83] J. E. Brazier,et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. , 1992, BMJ.
[84] C. Sherbourne,et al. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .
[85] A S Detsky,et al. How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. , 1992, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.
[86] H N Herkowitz,et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[87] S Senn,et al. Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. , 1990, BMJ.
[88] A. Enthoven. Shattuck Lecture--cutting cost without cutting the quality of care. , 1978, The New England journal of medicine.
[89] W. M. Barclay. Surgery , 1894, Bristol medico-chirurgical journal.
[90] W. B. van den Hout,et al. The value of productivity: human-capital versus friction-cost method , 2009, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases.
[91] P. Huddleston. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and Pain Scales , 2009 .
[92] J. Stockman. Surgical vs Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Disk Herniation: The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): A Randomized Trial , 2008 .
[93] J. Stockman. Surgical vs Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Disk Herniation: The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) Observational Cohort , 2008 .
[94] J. Caro,et al. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. , 2008, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.
[95] J. Ware. SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide , 2003 .
[96] Jennifer L Keating,et al. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. , 2002, Physical therapy.
[97] P. Fritzell. Fusion Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain , 2001 .
[98] M. Grevitt,et al. The Short Form-36 Health Survey Questionnaire In Spine Surgery , 1997 .
[99] John E. Ware,et al. SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales : a user's manual , 1994 .
[100] A. Williams. EuroQol : a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life , 1990 .
[101] C. R. Weatherley,et al. Discogenic pain persisting despite solid posterior fusion. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.