A Piecewise Aggregation of (Some) Philosophers’ and Biologists’ Perspectives

Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings is about new approaches to many of the big topics in philosophy of science today, but with a very different take. To begin with, we are urged to reject the received Cartesian-Laplacean myths: Descartes’ certainty and Laplace’s computational omniscience. Instead, Wimsatt re-engineers a philosophy for human beings with all their cognitive limitations. His approaches find their starting point in the actual practices of scientists themselves, which he strongly identifies with engineering practices as the source of researchers’ solutions for dealing with a complex world. He aims to construct an understanding of scientific methodology around the central role of reduction. But he dismisses eliminative reductionism in favor of a heuristic-based realist view. Wimsatt’s world is a complex one, and this means that science needs to do away with all the absolute and simple answers, because they do not reflect the world we are living in. A complex world requires the mindset and tinkering of an engineer to uncover its reality. The appropriate response must be heuristics all the way down as we constantly seek out reliable inferences on often shifting ground. To this end, we aim for models and theories that are robust, just as engineers aim to build robust machines. And although errors occur and approaches are fallible, they allow us to continually adapt the heuristics applied and sharpen our perceptions so as to develop more refined tools for investigating and understanding the world.

[1]  B. V. Fraassen Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective , 2008 .

[2]  W E Castle,et al.  Is the Arrangement of the Genes in the Chromosome Linear? , 1919, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  R. Feynman The Character of Physical Law , 1965 .

[4]  B. Calcott,et al.  Wimsatt and the robustness family: Review of Wimsatt’s Re-engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings , 2011 .

[5]  R. Lewontin,et al.  Facts and the Factitious in Natural Sciences , 1991, Critical Inquiry.

[6]  D. Campbell Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities , 2007 .

[7]  William Bechtel,et al.  Taking the Naturalistic Turn, or, How Real Philosophy of Science is Done Conversations with William Bechtel ... [Et Al.] , 1993 .

[8]  Agust́ın Rayo,et al.  Word and Objects , 2002 .

[9]  W. Vent,et al.  Riedl, Rupert, Die Ordnung des Lebendigen. Systembedingungen der Evolution. 372 S., 317 Abb., 7 Tab. Verlag Paul Parey. Hamburg und Berlin, 1975 Preis: geb. DM 98,‐ , 1978 .

[10]  G B Müller,et al.  Generation, integration, autonomy: three steps in the evolution of homology. , 2007, Novartis Foundation symposium.

[11]  Werner Callebaut,et al.  Scientific perspectivism: A philosopher of science's response to the challenge of big data biology. , 2012, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.

[12]  M. West-Eberhard Developmental plasticity and evolution , 2003 .

[13]  Alexander Rosenberg Darwinian Reductionism: Or, How to Stop Worrying and Love Molecular Biology , 2006 .

[14]  E. Hong,et al.  Comparative analysis of neurulation: First impressions do not count , 2009, Molecular reproduction and development.

[15]  R. Levins The strategy of model building in population biology , 1966 .

[16]  D. Campbell Ethnocentrism of Disciplines and the Fish-Scale Model of Omniscience , 2017 .