Understanding and Exploring Operator Needs in Mixed Model Assembly

Assembly operators are experiencing ever-increasing cognitive loads due to increasing production complexity. Higher quality assembly instructions, with input from operators by sharing their knowledge, can reduce errors during the assembly process. This article describes two studies that investigate the human needs for a digital process that streamlines the input of operators in the creation or adaptation of work instructions in a Mixed-Model Assembly Systems. The first study consisted of contextual inquiries and semi-structured interviews and aimed to discover the high-level needs of the different roles involved in the creation process. The second study used the Wizard of Oz method to investigate which interaction methods could be suitable to provide feedback about erroneous assemblies. We found that any systems should take into consideration, among other things, current operator mobility, presence of multiple operators at a workstation and different technological skill levels as important factors to consider when developing new systems to capture operator knowledge. With respect to interaction methods, participants preferred manual input devices over gestural feedback methods.

[1]  Bodo Urban,et al.  Follow-Me: Smartwatch Assistance on the Shop Floor , 2014, HCI.

[2]  László Monostori,et al.  Complexity in engineering design and manufacturing , 2012 .

[3]  Åsa Fast-Berglund,et al.  Relations between complexity, quality and cognitive automation in mixed-model assembly , 2013 .

[4]  James A. Landay,et al.  Sketching storyboards to illustrate interface behaviors , 1996, CHI Conference Companion.

[5]  Gunther Notni,et al.  Design Recommendations for HMD-based Assembly Training Tasks , 2018, SmartObjects@CHI.

[6]  Antonio Padovano,et al.  Smart operators in industry 4.0: A human-centered approach to enhance operators' capabilities and competencies within the new smart factory context , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[7]  Johannes Cottyn,et al.  Framework for evaluating cognitive support in mixed model assembly systems , 2015 .

[8]  Åsa Fast-Berglund,et al.  Assessing Operator Wellbeing through Physiological Measurements in Real-Time—Towards Industrial Application , 2017 .

[9]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[10]  Arne Jönsson,et al.  Wizard of Oz studies: why and how , 1993, IUI '93.

[11]  J. Miltenberg,et al.  Level schedules for mixed-model assembly lines in just-in-time production systems , 1989 .

[12]  Sotiris Makris,et al.  Automotive assembly technologies review: challenges and outlook for a flexible and adaptive approach , 2010 .

[13]  Peter Constable,et al.  DSDM: Dynamic Systems Development Method: The Method in Practice , 1997 .

[14]  Sandra Mattsson,et al.  DESIGN OF SIMPLE GUIDELINES TO IMPROVE ASSEMBLY INSTRUCTIONS AND OPERATOR PERFORMANCE , 2014 .

[15]  Sotiris Makris,et al.  Augmented reality system for operator support in human–robot collaborative assembly , 2016 .