The Measurement of Learners’ Self-Regulated Cognitive and Metacognitive Processes While Using Computer-Based Learning Environments

In an attempt to combat ever-increasing class sizes and the teacher bandwidth problem (Wiley & Edwards, 2002), educators are depending more and more upon computerbased learning environments (CBLEs) as pedagogical tools. CBLEs, including hypertext, hypermedia, intelligent tutoring systems (ITS), virtual worlds, simulations, and other environments that use some type of technology to deliver instruction or instructional materials, can be powerful learning tools due to their ability to present multiple representations of information in a manner that affords a great deal of learner control (Lajoie & Azevedo, 2006). However, the research is clear that students who are unable to effectively self-regulate their learning (Winne & Hadwin, 2008; Zimmerman, 2000) with CBLEs are much less likely to acquire deep, conceptual understanding than their peers who have these skills (Azevedo, 2005a; Azevedo & Jacobson, 2008; Greene & Azevedo, 2007; Shapiro, 2008; Shapiro & Niederhauser, 2004; White & Frederiksen, 2005). Therefore, there has been increasing interest in studying how students self-regulate when learning with CBLEs, and how selfregulated learning (SRL) processing can be fostered in students who do not enact these behaviors on their own. The impetus for this special issue of Educational Psychologist came from our observations that self-report methods of measuring SRL (e.g., the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire; Duncan & McKeachie, 2005) are being supplanted by techniques that capture SRL as dynamic series of events

[1]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance , 2011 .

[2]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Improving Measurements of Self-Regulated Learning , 2010 .

[3]  Stephanie Pieschl,et al.  The Role of Epistemic Beliefs in Students’ Self-Regulated Learning With Computer-Based Learning Environments: Conceptual and Methodological Issues , 2010 .

[4]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Self-Regulated Learning in Learning Environments With Pedagogical Agents That Interact in Natural Language , 2010 .

[5]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Measuring Self-Regulation in Computer-Based Learning Environments , 2010 .

[6]  Daniel C. Moos,et al.  Measuring Cognitive and Metacognitive Regulatory Processes During Hypermedia Learning: Issues and Challenges , 2010 .

[7]  K. Koedinger,et al.  Automated, Unobtrusive, Action-by-Action Assessment of Self-Regulation During Learning With an Intelligent Tutoring System , 2010 .

[8]  Cheryl Mason Bolick,et al.  Fostering historical knowledge and thinking skills using hypermedia learning environments: The role of self-regulated learning , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Candice Burkett,et al.  Self-regulated Learning with MetaTutor: Advancing the Science of Learning with MetaCognitive Tools , 2010 .

[10]  Jan Elen,et al.  The use of support devices in electronic learning environments , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  Maria Bannert,et al.  Effects of a metacognitive support device in learning environments , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  Allan Collins,et al.  The Interplay of Scientific Inquiry and Metacognition , 2009 .

[13]  John C. Nesbit,et al.  Supporting Self-Regulated Learning with Cognitive Tools , 2009 .

[14]  Douglas J. Hacker,et al.  Handbook of Metacognition in Education , 2009 .

[15]  Gregory Schraw A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring , 2009 .

[16]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  A macro-level analysis of SRL processes and their relations to the acquisition of a sophisticated mental model of a complex system☆☆☆ , 2009 .

[17]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. , 2008 .

[18]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Designing Learning by Teaching Agents: The Betty's Brain System , 2008, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[19]  B. Zimmerman Investigating Self-Regulation and Motivation: Historical Background, Methodological Developments, and Future Prospects , 2008, American Educational Research Journal.

[20]  Amy M. Shapiro,et al.  Hypermedia design as learner scaffolding , 2008 .

[21]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Advances in scaffolding learning with hypertext and hypermedia: a summary and critical analysis , 2008 .

[22]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Advances in scaffolding learning with hypertext and hypermedia: theoretical, empirical, and design issues , 2008 .

[23]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications , 2009 .

[24]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Understanding the complex nature of self-regulatory processes in learning with computer-based learning environments: an introduction , 2007 .

[25]  M. Veenman The assessment and instruction of self-regulation in computer-based environments: a discussion , 2007 .

[26]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  The use of computer-based environments for understanding and improving self-regulation , 2007 .

[27]  Krista R. Muis The Role of Epistemic Beliefs in Self-Regulated Learning , 2007 .

[28]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Toward an Affect-Sensitive AutoTutor , 2007, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[29]  M. Bannert Effects of Reflection Prompts When Learning with Hypermedia , 2006 .

[30]  Maria Bannert,et al.  Editorial Introduction: Analyzing (Self-)Monitoring in Computer Assisted Learning , 2006 .

[31]  J. Greene,et al.  Adolescents' Use of Self-Regulatory Processes and Their Relation to Qualitative Mental Model Shifts While Using Hypermedia , 2006, ICLS.

[32]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Teaching and Learning in Technology-Rich Environments , 2006 .

[33]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Toward Meta-cognitive Tutoring: A Model of Help Seeking with a Cognitive Tutor , 2006, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[34]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  The Role of Goal Structure in Undergraduates’ Use of Self-Regulatory Variables in Two Hypermedia Learning Tasks , 2006 .

[35]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Scaffolding Self-regulated Learning and Metacognition – Implications for the Design of Computer-based Scaffolds , 2005 .

[36]  R. Azevedo Computer Environments as Metacognitive Tools for Enhancing Learning , 2005 .

[37]  R. Azevedo Using Hypermedia as a Metacognitive Tool for Enhancing Student Learning? The Role of Self-Regulated Learning , 2005 .

[38]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  A Theoretical Framework and Approach for Fostering Metacognitive Development , 2005 .

[39]  K. VanLehn,et al.  Scaffolding Deep Comprehension Strategies Through Point&Query, AutoTutor, and iSTART , 2005 .

[40]  W. McKeachie,et al.  The Making of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire , 2005 .

[41]  Marcel V. J. Veenman,et al.  The assessment of metacognitive skills: what can be learned from multi-method designs? , 2005 .

[42]  Amy M. Shapiro,et al.  LEARNING FROM HYPERTEXT: RESEARCH ISSUES AND FINDINGS , 2004 .

[43]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[44]  David A. Wiley,et al.  Online Self-Organizing Social Systems: The Decentralized Future of Online Learning , 2002 .

[45]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Measuring Self-Regulated Learning , 2000 .

[46]  P. Pintrich The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. , 2000 .

[47]  B. Zimmerman Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. , 2000 .