Strategies to set global analytical quality specifications in laboratory medicine: 10 years on from the Stockholm consensus conference

The setting of analytical quality specifications in laboratory medicine has attracted attention for many years. Over time, many strategies were advocated and all had advantages and disadvantages. In the final decade of the last millennium, considerable confusion existed on how to define analytical quality specifications correctly and how to apply them in everyday practice. This led to wide professional interest. In 1999, a consensus conference sponsored by IUPAC, IFCC and WHO was held in Stockholm on “Strategies to Set Global Analytical Quality Specifications in Laboratory Medicine”. The consensus set useful and well-documented strategies for the setting of analytical quality specifications into a hierarchy with the best strategy at the highest level, namely, (1) Evaluation of the effect of analytical performance on clinical outcomes in specific clinical situations, (2) Evaluation of the effect of analytical performance on clinical decisions in general, (3) Published professional recommendations, (4) Performance goals set by regulatory bodies and EQAS organisers, and (5) Goals based on the current state of the art. Much success has been achieved since the promulgation of the statement with the approach being adopted by many in laboratory medicine for a very wide variety of purposes, particularly in quality management. However, there is a requirement for additional investigation of, inter alia, quality specifications for examinations done on measurements performed on ordinal and nominal scales, pre-analytical factors and matrix effects, examinations done as POCT, target values of control materials, and ways in which analytical quality specifications can be used both to set what is the optimum performance and as a tool for assessment of everyday practice.

[1]  J. Henriksen,et al.  E. H. Starling, R. Tigerstedt and J. E. Johansson: confidence and quotations about fluid dynamics and cardiac performance , 2004, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[2]  P. Hyltoft Petersen,et al.  The Nordic Reference Interval Project 2000: recommended reference intervals for 25 common biochemical properties , 2004, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[3]  D. B. Tonks,et al.  A study of the accuracy and precision of clinical chemistry determinations in 170 Canadian laboratories. , 1963, Clinical chemistry.

[4]  R N Barnett,et al.  Medical significance of laboratory results. , 1968, American journal of clinical pathology.

[5]  Jean-Claude Libeer,et al.  Proposals for Setting Generally Applicable Quality Goals Solely Based on Biology , 1997, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[6]  S Sandberg,et al.  Patient-derived quality specifications for instruments used in self-monitoring of blood glucose. , 2001, Clinical chemistry.

[7]  C P Price,et al.  Point of Care Testing , 1999, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  Hyltoft P. Petersen,et al.  How to deal with dichotomous tests? Application of a rankit ordinal scale model with examples from the Nordic ordinal scale project on screening tests , 2008, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[9]  Sverre Sandberg,et al.  How to deal with semi-quantitative tests? Application of an ordinal scale model to measurements of urine glucose , 2009, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[10]  Fraser Cg,et al.  Analytical goals in clinical biochemistry. , 1981 .

[11]  Carmen Ricós,et al.  Characterization and classification of external Quality Assessment Schemes (EQA) according to objectives such as evaluation of method and participant bias and standard deviation , 1996 .

[12]  P. H. Petersen,et al.  Analytical performance characteristics should be judged against objective quality specifications. , 1999, Clinical chemistry.

[13]  Virtudes Alvarez,et al.  Within-subject biological variation in disease: collated data and clinical consequences , 2007, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[14]  M Hørder,et al.  Analytical goals for the acceptance of common reference intervals for laboratories throughout a geographical area. , 1988, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[15]  George Z. Williams,et al.  Biological and Analytic Components of Variation in Long-Term Studies of Serum Constituents in Normal Subjects I. Objectives, Subject Selection, Laboratory Procedures, and Estimation of Analytic Deviation , 1970 .

[16]  D S Young,et al.  Biological and analytic components of variation in long-term studies of serum constituents in normal subjects. IV. Results of a study designed to eliminate long-term analytic deviations. , 1970, Clinical chemistry.

[17]  Callum G. Fraser,et al.  Biological Variation: From Principles to Practice , 2001 .

[18]  L. Lind,et al.  The influence of obesity and fat distribution on induction and maintenance doses of propofol. (Short communication). , 1993, Upsala journal of medical sciences.

[19]  C G Fraser,et al.  Introduction: strategies to set global quality specifications in laboratory medicine. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[20]  Sverre Sandberg,et al.  Interpretation of Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Values among Diabetic Patients Implications for Quality Specifications for HbA1c , 2001 .

[21]  C Ricós,et al.  Desirable routine analytical goals for quantities assayed in serum. Discussion paper from the members of the external quality assessment (EQA) Working Group A on analytical goals in laboratory medicine. , 1995, European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry : journal of the Forum of European Clinical Chemistry Societies.

[22]  Walter Hofmann,et al.  European Urinalysis Guidelines , 2000, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum.

[23]  J C Boyd,et al.  Quality specifications for glucose meters: assessment by simulation modeling of errors in insulin dose. , 2001, Clinical chemistry.

[24]  C G Fraser,et al.  Desirable performance standards for clinical chemistry tests. , 1983, Advances in clinical chemistry.

[25]  W. Guder,et al.  Preanalytical factors and their influence on analytical quality specifications. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[26]  M Hørder,et al.  Assessing (analytical) quality in clinical chemistry. Review of pertinent literature. , 1980, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum.

[27]  E. K. Harris,et al.  Statistical principles underlying analytic goal-setting in clinical chemistry. , 1979, American journal of clinical pathology.

[28]  D Kutter,et al.  Quality specifications for ordinal scale measurements with multiproperty (multiple) urine test strips. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.