Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part I. Research of Working Group 11, Accredited Standards Committee S12, Noise

This paper describes research conducted by Working Group 11 of Accredited Standards Committee S12, Noise, to develop procedures to estimate the field performance of hearing protection devices (HPDs). Current standardized test methods overestimate the attenuation achieved by workers in everyday use on the job. The goal was to approximate the amount of attenuation that can be achieved by noise‐exposed populations in well‐managed real‐world hearing conservation programs, while maintaining acceptable interlaboratory measurement variability. S12/WG11 designed two new laboratory‐based protocols for measuring real‐ear attenuation at threshold, with explicit procedures for subject selection, training, supervision, and HPD fitting. After pilot‐testing, S12/WG11 conducted a full‐scale study of three types of earplugs and one earmuff tested by four independent laboratories using both protocols. The protocol designated as ‘‘subject‐fit’’ assessed the attenuation achieved by subjects who were experienced in threshold ...

[1]  C. Dixon-Ernst,et al.  Why users need accurate real‐world estimates of hearing protector’s ratings , 1993 .

[2]  J. Casali,et al.  Hearing protector attenuation from subject‐fit methods at the work site and in the laboratory , 1993 .

[3]  E. Berger Development of a new hearing protector test standard—Overview of the efforts of ANSI S12/WG11 , 1993 .

[4]  C. Nixon Comparison of WG11 study variability to that of other interlaboratory studies , 1993 .

[5]  C. Merry,et al.  Sample size necessary to provide acceptable reproducibility in laboratory hearing protector attenuation testing , 1993 .

[6]  L. Royster,et al.  Results of the S12 Working Group 11 interlaboratory study to approximate real‐world attenuation of hearing protection devices (HPDs) , 1993 .

[7]  D. Ohlin A discussion of WG11’s anthropometric data with comparison to other available databases , 1993 .

[8]  C. Merry,et al.  The effect of fitting procedure on hearing protector attenuation. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[9]  Min-Yong Park,et al.  Labortory versus field attenuation of selected hearing protectors , 1991 .

[10]  B. Mozo,et al.  Results of a pilot interlaboratory comparison of REAT measurements of hearing protectors, coordinated by ANSI S12/WG11 , 1990 .

[11]  E H Berger,et al.  Is it necessary to measure hearing protector attenuation at 3.15 and 6.3 kHz? , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Brian W. Epps,et al.  Effects of User Insertion/Donning Instructions on Noise Attenuation of Aural Insert Hearing Protectors , 1986, Human factors.