Accuracy of Microwave Transistor fT and fMAX Extractions

We present a complete methodology to evaluate the accuracy of microwave transistor figures-of-merit fT (current gain cut-off frequency) and fMAX (maximum oscillation frequency). These figures-of-merit are usually extracted from calibrated S-parameter measurements affected by residual calibration and measurement uncertainties. Thus, the uncertainties associated to fT and fMAX can be evaluated only after an accurate computation of the S-parameters uncertainties, including the contribution from de-embedding. This was done with the aid of two recently released software tools. We also present an analysis on how different interpolation/extrapolation methodologies affect uncertainty. Finally, an overview of the possible causes of errors and suggestions on how to avoid them are given. With the continued rise of reported fT /fMAX values, this study has become necessary in order to add confidence intervals to these figures-of-merit

[1]  Johannes Hoffmann,et al.  Metas.UncLib—a measurement uncertainty calculator for advanced problems , 2012 .

[2]  Andrea Ferrero,et al.  A Comparison of Uncertainty Evaluation Methods for On-Wafer $S$-Parameter Measurements , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[3]  Z. Griffith,et al.  Sub-300 nm InGaAs/InP Type-I DHBTs with a 150 nm collector, 30 nm base demonstrating 755 GHz fmax and 416 GHz fT , 2007, 2007 IEEE 19th International Conference on Indium Phosphide & Related Materials.

[4]  David L. Pulfrey,et al.  Reconciliation of methods for estimating f/sub max/ for microwave heterojunction transistors , 1991 .

[5]  A. Safwat,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Calibration Standards for SOLT and LRRM , 2001, 58th ARFTG Conference Digest.

[6]  M. Garelli,et al.  A Unified Theory for $S$-Parameter Uncertainty Evaluation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[7]  N. Ridler,et al.  A generalised approach to the propagation of uncertainty in complex S-parameter measurements , 2004, 64th ARFTG Microwave Measurements Conference, Fall 2004..

[8]  H. Gummel.  On the definition of the cutoff frequency f T , 1969 .

[9]  P. Tasker,et al.  Comments on "A new low-noise AlGaAs/GaAs 2DEG FET with a surface undoped layer" , 1987 .

[10]  T. Schrader,et al.  Influence of Different Configurations of Nonideal Calibration Standards on Vector Network Analyzer Performance , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[11]  Dylan F. Williams,et al.  Covariance-Based Vector-Network-Analyzer Uncertainty Analysis for Time- and Frequency-Domain Measurements , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[12]  R. J. Havens,et al.  A calibrated lumped-element de-embedding technique for on-wafer RF characterization of high-quality inductors and high-speed transistors , 2003 .

[13]  J Martens.  LRM: A quantitative look at reference impedance contradictions and other uncertainty impacts , 2007, 2007 69th ARFTG Conference.

[14]  Chulho Chung,et al.  Five-Step (Pad–Pad Short–Pad Open–Short–Open) De-Embedding Method and Its Verification , 2009, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[15]  Uwe Arz,et al.  Applying the calibration comparison technique for verification of transmission line standards on silicon up to 110 GHz , 2009, 2009 73rd ARFTG Microwave Measurement Conference.

[16]  Guo-Wei Huang,et al.  A Cascade Open-Short-Thru (COST) De-Embedding Method for Microwave On-Wafer Characterization and Automatic Measurement , 2005, IEICE Trans. Electron..

[17]  B D Hall.  Calculating measurement uncertainty using automatic differentiation , 2002 .

[18]  Seonghearn Lee,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis of Two-Step and Three-Step Methods for Deembedding On-Wafer RF Transistor Measurements , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[19]  Lihan Chen,et al.  An Experimental Technique for Calibration Uncertainty Analysis , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[20]  M. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Extrapolated f/sub max/ of heterojunction bipolar transistors , 1999 .