International Journal of Health Geographics Geostatistical Analysis of Disease Data: Accounting for Spatial Support and Population Density in the Isopleth Mapping of Cancer Mortality Risk Using Area-to-point Poisson Kriging

BackgroundGeostatistical techniques that account for spatially varying population sizes and spatial patterns in the filtering of choropleth maps of cancer mortality were recently developed. Their implementation was facilitated by the initial assumption that all geographical units are the same size and shape, which allowed the use of geographic centroids in semivariogram estimation and kriging. Another implicit assumption was that the population at risk is uniformly distributed within each unit. This paper presents a generalization of Poisson kriging whereby the size and shape of administrative units, as well as the population density, is incorporated into the filtering of noisy mortality rates and the creation of isopleth risk maps. An innovative procedure to infer the point-support semivariogram of the risk from aggregated rates (i.e. areal data) is also proposed.ResultsThe novel methodology is applied to age-adjusted lung and cervix cancer mortality rates recorded for white females in two contrasted county geographies: 1) state of Indiana that consists of 92 counties of fairly similar size and shape, and 2) four states in the Western US (Arizona, California, Nevada and Utah) forming a set of 118 counties that are vastly different geographical units. Area-to-point (ATP) Poisson kriging produces risk surfaces that are less smooth than the maps created by a naïve point kriging of empirical Bayesian smoothed rates. The coherence constraint of ATP kriging also ensures that the population-weighted average of risk estimates within each geographical unit equals the areal data for this unit. Simulation studies showed that the new approach yields more accurate predictions and confidence intervals than point kriging of areal data where all counties are simply collapsed into their respective polygon centroids. Its benefit over point kriging increases as the county geography becomes more heterogeneous.ConclusionA major limitation of choropleth maps is the common biased visual perception that larger rural and sparsely populated areas are of greater importance. The approach presented in this paper allows the continuous mapping of mortality risk, while accounting locally for population density and areal data through the coherence constraint. This form of Poisson kriging will facilitate the analysis of relationships between health data and putative covariates that are typically measured over different spatial supports.

[1]  J. Fraumeni,et al.  Alternate ranging methods for cancer mortality maps. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  Pierre Goovaerts,et al.  International Journal of Health Geographics Geostatistical Analysis of Disease Data: Visualization and Propagation of Spatial Uncertainty in Cancer Mortality Risk Using Poisson Kriging and P-field Simulation , 2022 .

[3]  P. Monestiez,et al.  Geostatistical modelling of spatial distribution of balaenoptera physalus in the Northwestern Mediterranean Sea from sparse count data and heterogeneous observation efforts , 2006 .

[4]  J. Wakefield,et al.  Modeling Spatial Variation in Disease Risk , 2002 .

[5]  Glen D. Johnson Small area mapping of prostate cancer incidence in New York State (USA) using fully Bayesian hierarchical modelling , 2004, International journal of health geographics.

[6]  L. Waller,et al.  Applied Spatial Statistics for Public Health Data , 2004 .

[7]  Jun Zhu Statistical Methods for Spatial Data Analysis , 2006 .

[8]  Philip Woodward,et al.  BugsXLA: Bayes for the Common Man , 2005 .

[9]  Y. LindaJ. Combining Incompatible Spatial Data , 2003 .

[10]  Charles M. Croner,et al.  Visualization of Disease Surveillance Data with Geostatistics , 2001 .

[11]  P. Monestiez,et al.  Comparison of Model Based Geostatistical Methods in Ecology: Application to Fin Whale Spatial Distribution in Northwestern Mediterranean Sea , 2005 .

[12]  Pierre Goovaerts,et al.  Application of Poisson kriging to the mapping of cholera and dysentery incidence in an endemic area of Bangladesh , 2006, International journal of health geographics.

[13]  L. Pickle,et al.  Exploring spatial patterns of mortality: the new atlas of United States mortality. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  Jonathan Wakefield,et al.  A critique of statistical aspects of ecological studies in spatial epidemiology , 2004, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[15]  C. Deutsch,et al.  Geostatistics Banff 2004 , 2005 .

[16]  Linda J. Young,et al.  A Geostatistical Approach to Linking Geographically Aggregated Data From Different Sources , 2007 .

[17]  R. Webster,et al.  Binomial cokriging for estimating and mapping the risk of childhood cancer. , 1998, IMA journal of mathematics applied in medicine and biology.

[18]  P. Kyriakidis A Geostatistical Framework for Area-to-Point Spatial Interpolation , 2004 .

[19]  L. Waller,et al.  Applied Spatial Statistics for Public Health Data: Waller/Applied Spatial Statistics , 2004 .

[20]  Pierre Goovaerts,et al.  Kriging and Semivariogram Deconvolution in the Presence of Irregular Geographical Units , 2008, Mathematical geology.

[21]  Chris Chatfield,et al.  Statistical Methods for Spatial Data Analysis , 2004 .

[22]  C. A. Gotway Crawford,et al.  Change of support: an inter-disciplinary challenge , 2005 .

[23]  Timothy C. Coburn,et al.  Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation , 2000, Technometrics.

[24]  Pierre Goovaerts,et al.  International Journal of Health Geographics Geostatistical Analysis of Disease Data: Estimation of Cancer Mortality Risk from Empirical Frequencies Using Poisson Kriging , 2022 .

[25]  J. Besag,et al.  Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics , 1991 .

[26]  Sylvia Richardson,et al.  A comparison of Bayesian spatial models for disease mapping , 2005, Statistical methods in medical research.

[27]  E. Ziegel,et al.  Geostatistics Wollongong '96 , 1997 .

[28]  Michael Edward Hohn,et al.  An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics: by Edward H. Isaaks and R. Mohan Srivastava, 1989, Oxford University Press, New York, 561 p., ISBN 0-19-505012-6, ISBN 0-19-505013-4 (paperback), $55.00 cloth, $35.00 paper (US) , 1991 .

[29]  E. Ziegel,et al.  geoENV VII: Geostatistics for Environmental Applications , 1997 .

[30]  George Christakos,et al.  Efficient mapping of California mortality fields at different spatial scales , 2003, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[31]  Cynthia A. Brewer,et al.  Evaluation of Methods for Classifying Epidemiological Data on Choropleth Maps in Series , 2002 .

[32]  Olaf Berke,et al.  Exploratory disease mapping: kriging the spatial risk function from regional count data , 2004 .