Microbialite Morphostratigraphy as a Tool for Correlating Late Cambrian–Early Ordovician Sequences

Microbialite morphostratigraphy is a new tool for intrabasinal correlation using diverse microbialite structures (morphotypes). The recognition of the succession of morphotypes over constrained temporal intervals and broad areas is a function of the complex interactions that operate to create the structure. Because so many nonlinked variables (e.g., biotic, sedimentological, physicochemical) are involved, similar morphotypes do not reoccur over long temporal intervals. To demonstrate the technique, the upper Cambrian–lowermost Ordovician shelf strata of the Great Basin, United States, were correlated using both morphostratigraphy and standard lithostratigraphy. Six morphozones and one morphosubzone were recognized, as were four main lithologic successions. Because the boundaries between the morphozones and lithologic successions did not coincide, it is inferred that the characteristics of the various microbialite structures are not solely controlled by physical factors. The principles for establishing a morphostratigraphy outlined in this article allow for the potential to correlate along other ancient marine margins in both the same Cambrian and Ordovician interval, as well as any interval in the Phanerozoic in which diverse microbialite structures occur.

[1]  K. Walker,et al.  Selective dolomitization of Cambrian microbial carbonate deposits; a key to mechanisms and environments of origin , 1997 .

[2]  U. Mayr,et al.  Kilometre-Scale Microbial Buildups in a Rimmed Carbonate Platform Succession, Arctic Canada: New Insight on Lower Ordovician Reef Facies , 1995 .

[3]  K. Grey.  Neoproterozoic stromatolites from the Skates Hills Formation, Savory Basin, Western Australia, and a review of the distribution of Acaciella australica , 1995 .

[4]  C. Armella.  Thrombolitic-Stromatolitic Cycles of the Cambro-Ordovician Boundary Sequence, Precordillera Oriental Basin, Western Argentina , 1994 .

[5]  D. Bottjer,et al.  Early Triassic stromatolites as post-mass extinction disaster forms , 1992 .

[6]  S. Awramik,et al.  Stromatolites of the Mescal Limestone (Apache Group, middle Proterozoic, central Arizona): taxonomy, biostratigraphy, and paleoenvironments. , 1992, Geological Society of America bulletin.

[7]  S. Awramik.  The History and Significance of Stromatolites , 1992 .

[8]  R. Riding.  Classification of Microbial Carbonates , 1991 .

[9]  D. Lowe,et al.  Environmental control on diverse stromatolite morphologies in the 3000 Myr Pongola Supergroup, South Africa , 1989 .

[10]  J. F. Miller.  Conodonts as biostratigraphic tools for redefinition and correlation of the Cambrian–Ordovician Boundary , 1988, Geological Magazine.

[11]  R. Burne,et al.  Microbialites; organosedimentary deposits of benthic microbial communities , 1987 .

[12]  B. Pratt.  Stromatolite decline—A reconsideration , 1982 .

[13]  B. Pratt,et al.  Cryptalgal-metazoan bioherms of early Ordovician age in the St George Group, western Newfoundland , 1982 .

[14]  J. F. Read,et al.  Upper Cambrian Intrashelf Basin, Nolichucky Formation, Southwest Virginia Appalachians , 1982 .

[15]  Stanley M. Awramik,et al.  Stromatolite morphogenesis—progress and problems , 1979 .

[16]  M. A. Semikhatov.  Chapter 7.1 Experience in Stromatolite Studies in the U.S.S.R. , 1976 .

[17]  C. Monty.  Precambrian background and Phanerozoic history of stromatolitic communities, an overview , 1974 .

[18]  P. Cloud,et al.  Proterozoic stromatolite zonation , 1969 .

[19]  J. D. Aitken.  Classification and Environmental Significance of Cryptalgal Limestones and Dolomites, with Illustrations from the Cambrian and Ordovician of Southwestern Alberta , 1967 .

[20]  W. Howe.  Digitate algal stromatolite structures from the Cambrian and Ordovician of Missouri , 1966 .

[21]  M. Ewing,et al.  Pliocene-Pleistocene Boundary in Deep-Sea Sediments , 1963, Science.

[22]  O. Holtedahl,et al.  The Paleozoic formations of Finmarken in northern Norway , 1919 .