Toward an Experimental Basis for Protecting Forest Wildlife.

Social and economic debates over allocation of old-growth forests have spawned conservation strategies that are aimed at protecting sensitive wildlife species while allowing limited timber harvesting. We are interested in improving the scientific underpinnings for such conservation strategies, because doing so might both minimize costs of resource development and provide more reliable protection. Here, we discuss potential consequences from inductive inferencing systems used to develop technical support for protecting wildlife in temperate forests. For examples, we refer to recent conservation strategies for Northern Spotted Owls (Strix occidentalis caurina) and Red-cockaded Woodpeckers (Picoides borealis). Soft inferencing systems could result in conservation strategies that fail to meet intended goals, thereby exacerbating forestry-wildlife debates. Greater emphasis should be placed on hypothetico-deductive inferencing processes that vigorously employ adaptive management principles. Such processes simultaneously test alternative landscape patterns and forestry options as rigorous management experiments, and thus could incrementally predicate forest policy upon an experimental basis.

[1]  A. Sinclair Science and the practice of wildlife management , 1991 .

[2]  T. A. Hanley,et al.  Habitat evaluation: do use/availability data reflect carrying capacity? , 1990 .

[3]  R. Hooper,et al.  Heart Rot and Cavity Tree Selection by Red-Cockaded Woodpeckers , 1991 .

[4]  D. Rudolph,et al.  Red-cockaded Woodpecker Colony Status and Trends On the Angelina, Davy Crockett and Sabine National Forests , 1989 .

[5]  L. Slobodkin,et al.  The Role of Minimalism in Art and Science , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[6]  Kenneth H. Reckhow,et al.  Bayesian inference in non-replicated ecological studies , 1990 .

[7]  D. Rudolph,et al.  FOREST HABITAT LOSS, FRAGMENTATION, AND RED-COCKADED WOODPECKER POPULATIONS , 1991 .

[8]  B. Noon,et al.  Integrating Scientific Methods with Habitat Conservation Planning: Reserve Design for Northern Spotted Owls. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[9]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Large‐Scale Management Experiments and Learning by Doing , 1990 .

[10]  D. Armstrong Levels of cause and effect as organizing principles for research in animal behaviour , 1991 .

[11]  H. Charles Romesburg,et al.  WILDLIFE SCIENCE: GAINING RELIABLE KNOWLEDGE , 1981 .

[12]  R. Vadas,et al.  Inference in Ecology: The Sea Urchin Phenomenon in the Northwestern Atlantic , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[13]  Dennis D. Murphy,et al.  Coping with uncertainty in wildlife biology , 1991 .

[14]  T. C. Chamberlin The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses: With this method the dangers of parental affection for a favorite theory can be circumvented. , 1965, Science.

[15]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Large‐Scale Perturbations: Opportunities for Innovation , 1990 .

[16]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources , 1986 .

[17]  David S. Wilcove,et al.  Nest Predation in Forest Tracts and the Decline of Migratory Songbirds , 1985 .

[18]  James F. Quinn,et al.  On Hypothesis Testing in Ecology and Evolution , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[19]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Population Dynamics in Complex Landscapes: A Case Study. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[20]  Gregory J. Davis,et al.  The demographic significance of ‘sink’ populations , 1991 .

[21]  H. Salwasser,et al.  New Perspectives for Sustainable Natural Resources Management. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[22]  H. Charles Romesburg,et al.  ON IMPROVING THE NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES , 1991 .