Techniques for Assessing Standardization in Artifact Assemblages: Can We Scale Material Variability?

The study of artifact standardization is an important line of archaeological inquiry that continues to be plagued by the lack of an independent scale that would indicate what a highly variable or highly standardized assemblage should look like. Related to this problem is the absence of a robust statistical technique for comparing variation between different kinds of assemblages. This paper addresses these issues. The Weber fraction for line-length estimation describes the minimum difference that humans can perceive through unaided visual inspection. This value is used to derive a constant for the coefficient of variation (CV = 1.7 percent) that represents the highest degree of standardization attainable through manual human production of artifacts. Random data are used to define a second constant for the coefficient of variation that represents variation expected when production is random (CV = 57.7 percent). These two constants can be used to assess the degree of standardization in artifact assemblages regardless of kind. Our analysis further demonstrates that CV is an excellent measure of standardization and provides a robust statistical technique for comparing standardization in samples of artifacts.

[1]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[2]  James H. Howard,et al.  Magnitude estimates of perceived and remembered length and area , 1984 .

[3]  R. Moyer,et al.  Psychophysical functions for perceived and remembered size. , 1978, Science.

[4]  James M. Skibo,et al.  The Explanation of Artifact Variability , 1997, American Antiquity.

[5]  F. R. Hodson,et al.  Mathematics and computers in archaeology , 1975 .

[6]  R. Teghtsoonian,et al.  On the exponents in Stevens' law and the constant in Ekman's law. , 1971, Psychological review.

[7]  J. H. Howard,et al.  Memory psychophysics for visual area and length , 1978, Memory & cognition.

[8]  P. Arnold.  Dimensional Standardization and Production Scale in Mesoamerican Ceramics , 1991, Latin American Antiquity.

[9]  Ramesh C. Gupta,et al.  Testing the equality of coefficients of variation in k normal populations , 1996 .

[10]  Jelmer W. Eerkens,et al.  Practice Makes Within 5% of Perfect: Visual Perception, Motor Skills, and Memory in Artifact Variation1 , 2000, Current Anthropology.

[11]  Melissa B. Hagstrum,et al.  Standardization, Labor Investment, Skill, and the Organization of Ceramic Production in Late Prehispanic Highland Peru , 1995, American Antiquity.

[12]  W. Hotopf,et al.  Position in the Visual Field and Spatial Expansion , 1983, Perception.

[13]  Philip G. Chase.  Symbols and paleolithic artifacts: Style, standardization, and the imposition of arbitrary form , 1991 .

[14]  B. M. Bennett.  On an Approximate Test for Homogeneity of Coefficients of Variation , 1976 .

[15]  H S Smallman,et al.  Fine grain of the neural representation of human spatial vision , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  Mark G. Vangel,et al.  Confidence Intervals for a Normal Coefficient of Variation , 1996 .

[17]  Masashi Kobayashi,et al.  Southwestern Pottery Standardization: An Ethnoarchaeological View from the Philippines , 1988 .

[18]  Pamela B. Vandiver,et al.  The Standardization Hypothesis and Ceramic Mass Production: Technological, Compositional, and Metric Indexes of Craft Specialization at Tell Leilan, Syria , 1993, American Antiquity.

[19]  C. Pagano,et al.  Perceiving the lengths of rods wielded in differentmedia , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Jb Jan Dijkstra,et al.  A multi sample test for the equality of coefficients of variation in normal populations , 1983 .

[21]  David L. Clarke,et al.  Models in archaeology , 1972 .

[22]  Morton B. Brown,et al.  Robust Tests for the Equality of Variances , 1974 .

[23]  M. Dobres,et al.  Gender and prehistoric technology: On the social agency of technical strategies , 1995 .

[24]  G. Gescheider.  Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[25]  Brian Hayden,et al.  Specialization in the Paleolithic , 1988 .

[26]  D. Laming.  The measurement of sensation , 1997 .

[27]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Psychophysics: Introduction to Its Perceptual, Neural and Social Prospects , 1975 .

[28]  R. Verrillo.  Stability of line-length estimates using the method of absolute magnitude estimation , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  Peter J White,et al.  What mean these stones?: ethno-taxonomic models and archaeological interpretations in the New Guinea Highlands , 1972 .

[30]  W. J. Ziegler,et al.  Contribution to Applied Statistics , 1976, Experientia Supplementum.

[31]  S. Coren,et al.  In Sensation and perception , 1979 .

[32]  Peter Bleed,et al.  The Optimal Design of Hunting Weapons: Maintainability or Reliability , 1986, American Antiquity.

[33]  James H. Howard,et al.  Memory and Perception of Cartographic Information for Familiar and Unfamiliar Environments , 1981 .

[34]  Daniel Algom,et al.  Psychophysical approaches to cognition. , 1992 .

[35]  Absolute estimation of line length as a function of sex , 1982 .

[36]  Ernst Heinrich Weber,et al.  De pulsu, resorptione, auditu et tactu. Annotationes anatomicae et physiologicae , 1834 .

[37]  Wolfgang Reh,et al.  Significance tests and confidence intervals for coefficients of variation , 1996 .

[38]  Richard P. Runyon.  Fundamentals of behavioral statistics , 1968 .

[39]  Stevens Jc,et al.  Thermal intensification of touch sensation: further extensions of the Weber phenomenon. , 1979 .

[40]  K. N. Ogle.  Researches in binocular vision. , 1950 .

[41]  Helen E. Ross,et al.  On the possible relations between discriminability and apparent magnitude. , 1997 .

[42]  Daniel Algom,et al.  8 Memory Psychophysics: An Examination of its Perceptual and Cognitive Prospects1 , 1992 .

[43]  G. Mather.  The Use of Image Blur as a Depth Cue , 1997, Perception.

[44]  S. Link,et al.  Bias in Quantifying Judgments , 1989 .

[45]  Jelmer W. Eerkens,et al.  Reliable and Maintainable Technologies: Artifact Standardization and the Early to Later Mesolithic T , 1998 .

[46]  L. Jones,et al.  Perception of force and weight: theory and research. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  Robert L. Bettinger,et al.  Point Typologies, Cultural Transmission, and the Spread of Bow-and-Arrow Technology in the Prehistoric Great Basin , 1999, American Antiquity.

[48]  H. Ross,et al.  How important are changes in body weight for mass perception? , 1981, Acta astronautica.

[49]  R. T. Verrillo.  Absolute estimation of line length in three age groups. , 1981, Journal of gerontology.

[50]  G. E. Miller,et al.  An asymptotic test for the equality of coefficients of variation from k populations. , 1996, Statistics in medicine.

[51]  K H Norwich,et al.  On the theory of Weber fractions , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  J C Stevens,et al.  Thermal intensification of touch sensation: further extensions of the Weber phenomenon. , 1979, Sensory processes.

[53]  Miriam T. Stark,et al.  Alternative Procedures for Assessing Standardization in Ceramic Assemblages , 1996, American Antiquity.

[54]  H. Ross,et al.  Is The Weber Fraction a Function of Physical or Perceived Input? , 1964 .

[55]  F. A. Miles.  Binocular Vision and Stereopsis by Ian P. Howard and Brian J. Rogers, Oxford University Press, 1995. £90.00 (736 pages) ISBN 0 19 508476 4. , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[56]  M. E. Johnson,et al.  A Comparative Study of Tests for Homogeneity of Variances, with Applications to the Outer Continental Shelf Bidding Data , 1981 .